Emma J M Grigor1,2,3, Suha Kaaki4,5, Dean A Fergusson6, Donna E Maziak4,6, Andrew J E Seely4,6. 1. Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, 501 Smyth Road, PO Box 201B, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada. egrig010@uottawa.ca. 2. Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada. egrig010@uottawa.ca. 3. Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada. egrig010@uottawa.ca. 4. Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, 501 Smyth Road, PO Box 201B, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada. 5. Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada. 6. Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a common and serious complication following esophagectomy. We aimed to provide an up-to-date review and critical appraisal of the efficacy and safety of all previous interventions aiming to reduce AL risk. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and Embase from 1946 to January 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating interventions to minimize esophagogastric AL. Pooled risk ratios (RR) for AL were obtained using a random effects model. RESULTS: Two reviewers screened 441 abstracts and identified 17 RCTs eligible for inclusion; 11 studies were meta-analyzed. Omentoplasty significantly reduced the risk of AL by 78% [RR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.10, 0.50] compared to conventional anastomosis (3 studies, n = 611 patients). Early removal of NG tube significantly reduced the risk of AL by 62% [RR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.65] compared to prolonged NG tube removal (2 studies, n = 293 patients); Stapled anastomosis did not significantly reduce the risk of AL [RR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.45, 1.87] compared to hand-sewn anastomosis (6 studies, n = 1454 patients). The quality of evidence was high for omentoplasty (vs. conventional anastomosis), moderate for early NG tube removal (vs. prolonged NG tube removal), and very low for stapled anastomosis (vs. hand-sewn anastomosis). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first meta-analysis to summarize the graded quality of evidence for all RCT interventions designed to reduce the risk of AL following esophagectomy. Our findings demonstrated that omentoplasty significantly reduced the risk of AL with a high quality of evidence. Although early NG tube removal significantly reduced AL risk, there is a need for further research to strengthen the quality of evidence for this finding. Evidence profiles presented in our review may help inform the development of future clinical practice recommendations. Systematic review registration: CRD42019127181.
BACKGROUND:Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a common and serious complication following esophagectomy. We aimed to provide an up-to-date review and critical appraisal of the efficacy and safety of all previous interventions aiming to reduce AL risk. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and Embase from 1946 to January 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating interventions to minimize esophagogastric AL. Pooled risk ratios (RR) for AL were obtained using a random effects model. RESULTS: Two reviewers screened 441 abstracts and identified 17 RCTs eligible for inclusion; 11 studies were meta-analyzed. Omentoplasty significantly reduced the risk of AL by 78% [RR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.10, 0.50] compared to conventional anastomosis (3 studies, n = 611 patients). Early removal of NG tube significantly reduced the risk of AL by 62% [RR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.65] compared to prolonged NG tube removal (2 studies, n = 293 patients); Stapled anastomosis did not significantly reduce the risk of AL [RR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.45, 1.87] compared to hand-sewn anastomosis (6 studies, n = 1454 patients). The quality of evidence was high for omentoplasty (vs. conventional anastomosis), moderate for early NG tube removal (vs. prolonged NG tube removal), and very low for stapled anastomosis (vs. hand-sewn anastomosis). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first meta-analysis to summarize the graded quality of evidence for all RCT interventions designed to reduce the risk of AL following esophagectomy. Our findings demonstrated that omentoplasty significantly reduced the risk of AL with a high quality of evidence. Although early NG tube removal significantly reduced AL risk, there is a need for further research to strengthen the quality of evidence for this finding. Evidence profiles presented in our review may help inform the development of future clinical practice recommendations. Systematic review registration: CRD42019127181.
Authors: Teus J Weijs; Koshi Kumagai; Gijs H K Berkelmans; Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen; Magnus Nilsson; Misha D P Luyer Journal: Dis Esophagus Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 3.429
Authors: J A H Gooszen; L Goense; S S Gisbertz; J P Ruurda; R van Hillegersberg; M I van Berge Henegouwen Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2018-02-07 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: Gunnar Loske; Johannes Müller; Wolfgang Schulze; Burkhard Riefel; Christian Theodor Müller Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2022-01-01 Impact factor: 4.584