Andrea Teng1, Bertrand Buffière2, Murat Genç3, Telekaki Latavao4, Viliami Puloka5, Louise Signal5, Nick Wilson5. 1. Department of Public Health, University of Otago, PO Box 7343, Wellington, New Zealand. andrea.teng@otago.ac.nz. 2. Pacific Community, Nouméa, New Caledonia. 3. Department of Economics, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. 4. Department of Statistics, Nuku'alofa, Tonga. 5. Department of Public Health, University of Otago, PO Box 7343, Wellington, New Zealand.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine changes in beverage expenditure patterns before and after a T$0.50/L sweetened-beverage (SB) excise was introduced in Tonga in 2013, by household income, household age composition and island of residence. METHODS: Two cross-sectional surveys involved households being randomly sampled (the Household Income and Expenditure Surveys in 2009 (n = 1982) and 2015/16 (n = 1800)). Changes in soft drink (taxed), bottled water, and milk (both untaxed) expenditure were examined namely: (i) prevalence of households purchasing the beverage; (ii) average expenditure per person (inflation-adjusted); (iii) expenditure as a proportion of household food budget; and (iv) expenditure per person as a proportion of equivalised income. RESULTS: The pattern found was of decreases in all soft drink expenditure outcomes and these appeared to be greater in low-income than high-income households for purchasing prevalence (- 30% and - 25% respectively, t-test p = 0.98), per-capita expenditure (- 37% and - 34%, p = 0.20) and food budget share (- 27% and - 7%, p = 0.65), but not income share (- 6% and - 32%, p = 0.71). The large expenditure increases in bottled water appeared to be greater in low-income than high-income households for purchasing prevalence (355 and 172%, p = 0.32) and food budget share (665 and 468%, p = 0.09), but greater in high-income households for per-capita expenditure (121 and 373%, p < 0.01) and income share (83 and 397%, p = 0.50). CONCLUSIONS: The sweetened-beverage tax was associated with reduced soft drink purchasing and increased bottled water expenditure. Low-income households appeared to have slightly greater declines in soft drink expenditure.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine changes in beverage expenditure patterns before and after a T$0.50/L sweetened-beverage (SB) excise was introduced in Tonga in 2013, by household income, household age composition and island of residence. METHODS: Two cross-sectional surveys involved households being randomly sampled (the Household Income and Expenditure Surveys in 2009 (n = 1982) and 2015/16 (n = 1800)). Changes in soft drink (taxed), bottled water, and milk (both untaxed) expenditure were examined namely: (i) prevalence of households purchasing the beverage; (ii) average expenditure per person (inflation-adjusted); (iii) expenditure as a proportion of household food budget; and (iv) expenditure per person as a proportion of equivalised income. RESULTS: The pattern found was of decreases in all soft drink expenditure outcomes and these appeared to be greater in low-income than high-income households for purchasing prevalence (- 30% and - 25% respectively, t-test p = 0.98), per-capita expenditure (- 37% and - 34%, p = 0.20) and food budget share (- 27% and - 7%, p = 0.65), but not income share (- 6% and - 32%, p = 0.71). The large expenditure increases in bottled water appeared to be greater in low-income than high-income households for purchasing prevalence (355 and 172%, p = 0.32) and food budget share (665 and 468%, p = 0.09), but greater in high-income households for per-capita expenditure (121 and 373%, p < 0.01) and income share (83 and 397%, p = 0.50). CONCLUSIONS: The sweetened-beverage tax was associated with reduced soft drink purchasing and increased bottled water expenditure. Low-income households appeared to have slightly greater declines in soft drink expenditure.
Authors: Christina A Roberto; Hannah G Lawman; Michael T LeVasseur; Nandita Mitra; Ana Peterhans; Bradley Herring; Sara N Bleich Journal: JAMA Date: 2019-05-14 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Matthew M Lee; Jennifer Falbe; Dean Schillinger; Sanjay Basu; Charles E McCulloch; Kristine A Madsen Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2019-02-21 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Miriam Alvarado; Nigel Unwin; Stephen J Sharp; Ian Hambleton; Madhuvanti M Murphy; T Alafia Samuels; Marc Suhrcke; Jean Adams Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2019-01-30 Impact factor: 6.457