Literature DB >> 33459402

Evaluation of a multiview architecture for automatic vertebral labeling of palliative radiotherapy simulation CT images.

Tucker J Netherton1,2, Dong Joo Rhee1,2, Carlos E Cardenas1, Caroline Chung3, Ann H Klopp3, Christine B Peterson4, Rebecca M Howell1, Peter A Balter1, Laurence E Court1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to evaluate the performance of X-Net, a multiview deep learning architecture, to automatically label vertebral levels (S2-C1) in palliative radiotherapy simulation CT scans.
METHODS: For each patient CT scan, our automated approach 1) segmented spinal canal using a convolutional-neural network (CNN), 2) formed sagittal and coronal intensity projection pairs, 3) labeled vertebral levels with X-Net, and 4) detected irregular intervertebral spacing using an analytic methodology. The spinal canal CNN was trained via fivefold cross validation using 1,966 simulation CT scans and evaluated on 330 CT scans. After labeling vertebral levels (S2-C1) in 897 palliative radiotherapy simulation CT scans, a volume of interest surrounding the spinal canal in each patient's CT scan was converted into sagittal and coronal intensity projection image pairs. Then, intensity projection image pairs were augmented and used to train X-Net to automatically label vertebral levels using fivefold cross validation (n = 803). Prior to testing upon the final test set (n = 94), CT scans of patients with anatomical abnormalities, surgical implants, or other atypical features from the final test set were placed in an outlier group (n = 20), whereas those without these features were placed in a normative group (n = 74). The performance of X-Net, X-Net Ensemble, and another leading vertebral labeling architecture (Btrfly Net) was evaluated on both groups using identification rate, localization error, and other metrics. The performance of our approach was also evaluated on the MICCAI 2014 test dataset (n = 60). Finally, a method to detect irregular intervertebral spacing was created based on the rate of change in spacing between predicted vertebral body locations and was also evaluated using the final test set. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to investigate the performance of the method to detect irregular intervertebral spacing.
RESULTS: The spinal canal architecture yielded centroid coordinates spanning S2-C1 with submillimeter accuracy (mean ± standard deviation, 0.399 ± 0.299 mm; n = 330 patients) and was robust in the localization of spinal canal centroid to surgical implants and widespread metastases. Cross-validation testing of X-Net for vertebral labeling revealed that the deep learning model performance (F1 score, precision, and sensitivity) improved with CT scan length. The X-Net, X-Net Ensemble, and Btrfly Net mean identification rates and localization errors were 92.4% and 2.3 mm, 94.2% and 2.2 mm, and 90.5% and 3.4 mm, respectively, in the final test set and 96.7% and 2.2 mm, 96.9% and 2.0 mm, and 94.8% and 3.3 mm, respectively, within the normative group of the final test set. The X-Net Ensemble yielded the highest percentage of patients (94%) having all vertebral bodies identified correctly in the final test set when the three most inferior and superior vertebral bodies were excluded from the CT scan. The method used to detect labeling failures had 67% sensitivity and 95% specificity when combined with the X-Net Ensemble and flagged five of six patients with atypical vertebral counts (additional thoracic (T13), additional lumbar (L6) or only four lumbar vertebrae). Mean identification rate on the MICCAI 2014 dataset using an X-Net Ensemble was increased from 86.8% to 91.3% through the use of transfer learning and obtained state-of-the-art results for various regions of the spine.
CONCLUSIONS: We trained X-Net, our unique convolutional neural network, to automatically label vertebral levels from S2 to C1 on palliative radiotherapy CT images and found that an ensemble of X-Net models had high vertebral body identification rate (94.2%) and small localization errors (2.2 ± 1.8 mm). In addition, our transfer learning approach achieved state-of-the-art results on a well-known benchmark dataset with high identification rate (91.3%) and low localization error (3.3 mm ± 2.7 mm). When we pre-screened radiotherapy CT images for the presence of hardware, surgical implants, or other anatomic abnormalities prior to the use of X-Net, it labeled the spine correctly in more than 97% of patients and 94% of patients when scans were not prescreened. Automatically generated labels are robust to widespread vertebral metastases and surgical implants and our method to detect labeling failures based on neighborhood intervertebral spacing can reliably identify patients with an additional lumbar or thoracic vertebral body.
© 2020 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  automatic vertebral labeling; deep learning

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33459402      PMCID: PMC7756475          DOI: 10.1002/mp.14415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  33 in total

1.  The prevalence of transitional vertebrae in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Alexios Apazidis; Pedro A Ricart; Christopher M Diefenbach; Jeffrey M Spivak
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  A one-step cone-beam CT-enabled planning-to-treatment model for palliative radiotherapy-from development to implementation.

Authors:  Rebecca K S Wong; Daniel Letourneau; Anita Varma; Jean Pierre Bissonnette; David Fitzpatrick; Daniel Grabarz; Christine Elder; Melanie Martin; Andrea Bezjak; Tony Panzarella; Mary Gospodarowicz; David A Jaffray
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Spine detection and labeling using a parts-based graphical model.

Authors:  Stefan Schmidt; Jörg Kappes; Martin Bergtholdt; Vladimir Pekar; Sebastian Dries; Daniel Bystrov; Christoph Schnörr
Journal:  Inf Process Med Imaging       Date:  2007

4.  Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System.

Authors:  Laurence E Court; Kelly Kisling; Rachel McCarroll; Lifei Zhang; Jinzhong Yang; Hannah Simonds; Monique du Toit; Chris Trauernicht; Hester Burger; Jeannette Parkes; Mike Mejia; Maureen Bojador; Peter Balter; Daniela Branco; Angela Steinmann; Garrett Baltz; Skylar Gay; Brian Anderson; Carlos Cardenas; Anuja Jhingran; Simona Shaitelman; Oliver Bogler; Kathleen Schmeller; David Followill; Rebecca Howell; Christopher Nelson; Christine Peterson; Beth Beadle
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Joint Vertebrae Identification and Localization in Spinal CT Images by Combining Short- and Long-Range Contextual Information.

Authors:  Haofu Liao; Addisu Mesfin; Jiebo Luo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Deep Learning Algorithm for Auto-Delineation of High-Risk Oropharyngeal Clinical Target Volumes With Built-In Dice Similarity Coefficient Parameter Optimization Function.

Authors:  Carlos E Cardenas; Rachel E McCarroll; Laurence E Court; Baher A Elgohari; Hesham Elhalawani; Clifton D Fuller; Mona J Kamal; Mohamed A M Meheissen; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Arvind Rao; Bowman Williams; Andrew Wong; Jinzhong Yang; Michalis Aristophanous
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  The rapid access palliative radiotherapy program: blueprint for initiation of a one-stop multidisciplinary bone metastases clinic.

Authors:  A Fairchild; E Pituskin; B Rose; S Ghosh; J Dutka; A Driga; P Tachynski; J Borschneck; L Gagnon; S Macdonnell; J Middleton; K Thavone; S Carstairs; D Brent; D Severin
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Statistical validation of image segmentation quality based on a spatial overlap index.

Authors:  Kelly H Zou; Simon K Warfield; Aditya Bharatha; Clare M C Tempany; Michael R Kaus; Steven J Haker; William M Wells; Ferenc A Jolesz; Ron Kikinis
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Numeric and morphological verification of lumbosacral segments in 8280 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Nam Chull Paik; Chun Soo Lim; Ho Suk Jang
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Reducing radiotherapy waiting times for palliative patients: The role of the Advanced Practice Radiation Therapist.

Authors:  Mary Job; Tanya Holt; Anne Bernard
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2017-08-29
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Current development and prospects of deep learning in spine image analysis: a literature review.

Authors:  Biao Qu; Jianpeng Cao; Chen Qian; Jinyu Wu; Jianzhong Lin; Liansheng Wang; Lin Ou-Yang; Yongfa Chen; Liyue Yan; Qing Hong; Gaofeng Zheng; Xiaobo Qu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-06

2.  Clinical acceptability of fully automated external beam radiotherapy for cervical cancer with three different beam delivery techniques.

Authors:  Dong Joo Rhee; Anuja Jhingran; Kai Huang; Tucker J Netherton; Nazia Fakie; Ingrid White; Alicia Sherriff; Carlos E Cardenas; Lifei Zhang; Surendra Prajapati; Stephen F Kry; Beth M Beadle; William Shaw; Frederika O'Reilly; Jeannette Parkes; Hester Burger; Chris Trauernicht; Hannah Simonds; Laurence E Court
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 4.506

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.