Gotaro Toda1, Toshimasa Yamauchi1, Takashi Kadowaki2, Kohjiro Ueki3. 1. Department of Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. 2. Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. 3. Department of Molecular Diabetic Medicine, Diabetes Research Center, Research Institute, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
The assessment of macrophage function has been a topic of intense discussion due to multiple subtypes. This protocol describes the collection of bone marrow cells from the femur and tibia of mice, differentiation into bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDM cells), and sampling from cultures. This protocol focuses on the efficient preparation of BMDM cells, providing a way to assess the function of macrophages. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Toda et al. (2020).
The assessment of macrophage function has been a topic of intense discussion due to multiple subtypes. This protocol describes the collection of bone marrow cells from the femur and tibia of mice, differentiation into bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDM cells), and sampling from cultures. This protocol focuses on the efficient preparation of BMDM cells, providing a way to assess the function of macrophages. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Toda et al. (2020).
Mice should be available sufficiently before the in vitro experiment. Although we have not experienced marked differences in the viability of harvested cells among differently aged mice between 6–12 weeks of age or between male/female mice, the mice used should be of the same age and sex in the same experiment.Mice used in this protocol can be fasted or fed ad libitum at time of collection of bone marrow cells. Cell viability should be evaluated in relation to wild type mice in mice with defects in hematopoietic cells.
Prepare reagents and equipment
Timing: 30 min1 week before in vitro experiment. 1 h before collection of bone marrow cells.Add 10% FBS (heat inactivated) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin to DMEM high glucose (DMEM 10% FBS) and store at 4°C until preparation of the bone marrow culture medium.Keep DMEM (10% FBS) at 37°C. Add CSF-1 to obtain bone marrow culture medium after collection of bone marrow cells. Freshly prepare before harvesting bone marrow (Zhang et al., 2008).Prepare ice cold PBS (10 mL/ mouse) in 10 mL syringe with 23G needle, culture plate (one 12 well plate/ mouse), scissors, and forceps.Bring mice on site after preparation.
Key resources table
Materials and equipment
Step-by-step method details
Collection of bone marrow cells
Timing: 30 minDay 0This step prepares the bone marrow cells including progenitors which will differentiate into bone marrow-derived macrophages after culture. The time it takes to start of culture in the bone marrow culture medium should be minimal to maximize cell yield and to avoid contamination.Euthanize mouse by an appropriate method approved by the supervising institution. Appropriately remove excess blood in the following steps.Soak with 70% ethanol. (Also see Troubleshooting problem 1)Remove skin and expose lower limb.Cut major muscles near the base of the lower limb to expose the hip joint.Cut femur near the base (Figure 1).
Figure 1
Illustration describing steps 1–5.
Illustration describing steps 1–5.Cut Achilles tendon and remove major muscles around tibia.Remove major muscles around femur (Figure 2).
Figure 2
Illustration describing steps 6 and 7.
Illustration describing steps 6 and 7.Cut at knee joint.Remove major muscles around tibia, and remove fibula (Figure 3).
Figure 3
Illustration describing steps 8 and 9.
Illustration describing steps 8 and 9.Remove the epiphyses of femur and tibia so that the bone marrow can be accessed from the ends with a 23G needle. This can be confirmed by poking the ends with a needle (Also see Troubleshooting problem 2).Wash the bone marrow into a 50 mL tube by slowly injecting approximately 2–3 mL PBS per bone. The bone marrow will come out from the other end. Make sure the PBS does not backflow, to avoid contamination. Keep the bone marrow on ice.Repeat with other lower limb (Figure 4).
Figure 4
Illustration describing steps 10–12.
Illustration describing steps 10–12.For collection of bone marrow from 5 mice or more, or if collection takes more than 1 h, use DMEM without FBS for washing bone marrow.Centrifuge bone marrow suspension at 200 × g, 5 min at 4°C.Decant or aspirate PBS.To remove erythrocytes resuspend in 1× lyse buffer on ice, and let sit for 3 min. Add 10 mL DMEM (10% FBS 1% penicillin streptomycin) and centrifuge suspension at 200 × g, 5 min at 4°C, and repeat if necessary.
Differentiation into bone marrow-derived macrophages
Resuspend bone marrow (approx. 1 × 107 live cells per mouse) in 1 mL bone marrow culture medium, and filter through a 100 μm cell strainer.Pipette suspension (approx. 1 × 107 live cells) into total volume of bone marrow culture medium (approx. 12 mL for 12 well plate). 6 well plates and 24 well plates can also be used.Add bone marrow culture medium to wells (1 mL/well for 12 well plate). Culture at 37°C 5% CO2.Add half this volume of bone marrow culture medium on day 4 (e.g., 500 μL/well for 12 well plate). Adherent cells should show 1–2 protrusions at low magnification.
Preparation for in vitro experiment
Timing: 10 minDay 6This step describes the preparation for in vitro stimulation using BMDMs. FBS contains signaling peptides etc. that may obscure, for example, detection of phosphorylation in response to stimulation of interest. Therefore, a period of serum-free culture before stimulation is recommended in such experiments. Overnight culture in serum-free medium does not have a marked impact on cell viability, but baseline Akt phosphorylation is suppressed which makes detection of phosphorylation in response to in vitro stimulation clearer.Wash cells with sterile PBS, and change to DMEM 10% FBS, and continue culture at 37°C 5% CO2.For detection of phosphorylation signals etc., change to DMEM without FBS at this point.Timing: 10 minDay 7 (2 h before in vitro experiment)Change medium to DMEM without FBS if not already changed.
Sampling from bone marrow-derived macrophage cultures
Timing: 30 min to several hoursThis step describes sampling from BMDM cultures. To minimize altered signaling events, or gene expression, sampling directly from the culture plate is recommended.Change medium to medium containing stimulation of interest.After stimulation, wash cells twice with PBS, and aspirate.For creating a cell suspension, add 0.05% trypsin-EDTA (approx. 100 μL/well for 12 well plate) and incubate at 37°C for 3 min. Add DMEM (10% FBS, 1 mL/well for 12 well plate), dislodge the cells using a cell scraper, and transfer to a 5 mL round bottom tube.Centrifuge at 200 × g, 4°C for 3 min.Suspend cells in 1 mL FACS buffer for counting, and subsequent analysis.If sampling of protein or RNA takes place later, freeze the washed culture plate with liquid nitrogen, and keep in −80°C freezer. In the following steps, add extraction buffer directly to the wells, and pipette repeatedly until no adherent cells remain. Optionally, a cell scraper may be used to dislodge the cells.For extracting protein samples for western blot, add cell lysis buffer supplemented with 1× protease cocktail to the wells (approx. 100 μL/well for a 12 well plate), and transfer to a 1.5 mL sampling tube.Sonicate for 5 min at 4°C, and vortex.Centrifuge for 10 min at 10,000 × g and transfer supernatant to a 1.5 mL sampling tube. Avoid aspirating or contacting the sediment (Trouble shooting problem 3). 100–200 μg of protein is typically extracted.Add 1/3 volume of 4× Laemmli buffer, and boil for 10 min.Keep at −20°C until SDS-PAGE.For extracting RNA using RNeasy mini kit, add 350 μL buffer RLT to the wells. Final elution should use 50–100 μL TE. 5–10 μg RNA is typically extracted. Keep at −80°C until gene expression analysis.
Expected outcomes
From three male C57BL6/J mice at 8 weeks of age weighing 24.7 ± 0.8 g, (1.6 ± 0.2) × 107 live bone marrow cells were isolated. During culture, (1.2 ± 0.1) × 105 cells were adherent at day 4, and (1.7 ± 0.1) × 105 cells were adherent at day 7. Examples of gene expresion analyses using FACS, RT-PCR, and western blot are shown (Figures 5, 6, and 7).
Figure 5
FACS analysis of BMDM cell suspension
Over 90% of the cells were positive for CD11b and F4/80, which are markers for murine macrophages (Wynn et al., 2013).
Figure 6
Gene expression assessed by RT-PCR using RNA extracted from BMDM cultures stimulated overnight with 10 ng/mL LPS and 50 ng/mL IL-13
Genes known to be expressed by M1 and M2 macrophages could be detected (Martinez and Gordon, 2014; Wynn et al., 2013).
Figure 7
Akt phosphorylation assessed by western blot of protein extracted from BMDM cultures stimulated with 50 ng/mL IL-13
Signaling in response to IL-13 has been described by others (Brown Lobbins et al., 2018; Jiang et al., 2000).
FACS analysis of BMDM cell suspensionOver 90% of the cells were positive for CD11b and F4/80, which are markers for murine macrophages (Wynn et al., 2013).Gene expression assessed by RT-PCR using RNA extracted from BMDM cultures stimulated overnight with 10 ng/mL LPS and 50 ng/mL IL-13Genes known to be expressed by M1 and M2 macrophages could be detected (Martinez and Gordon, 2014; Wynn et al., 2013).Akt phosphorylation assessed by western blot of protein extracted from BMDM cultures stimulated with 50 ng/mL IL-13Signaling in response to IL-13 has been described by others (Brown Lobbins et al., 2018; Jiang et al., 2000).
Limitations
The cultures are viable for at least 3–4 days after differentiation, but have little or no replicating potential after differentiation, and therefore the in vitro experiment should conclude without passage.Although the BMDM cultures generated using this protocol are useful for analyzing genes known to be expressed by multiple macrophage subtypes, they cannot be used to assess different macrophage functions between tissues (Toda et al., 2020; Weischenfeldt and Porse, 2008). Additionally, this protocol only covers the assessment of BMDM cells before polarization into different macrophage subsets as described by others (Wynn et al., 2013). The cells may be further cultured with IFN-γ, IL-4 etc. to assess the function of polarized macrophage subsets although one should be aware that functions of such strongly polarized macrophages only limitedly reflect the in vivo variety of macrophages (Murray et al., 2014). As assessment of macrophage function using unpolarized BMDM cultures generated as described in this protocol provides a view of cellular function without narrowing the scope of the analysis to a certain polarization, it provides candidates of cellular functions some of which in combination with in vivo analyses may subsequently prove to be of importance in physiological or pathological conditions. The BMDM cultures described in this protocol, as in all immune cell cultures do not completely reflect the variety of immune cells in vivo, and future development and utilization of single-cell techniques may be key to further analysis of immune cell function in high spatiotemporal resolution.
Troubleshooting
Problem 1
Generated cells are sparse.
Potential solution
BMDM cultures generated should be approximately 75% confluent. If cells are sparser, the amount of collected bone marrow may be inadequate perhaps due to cutting the edges of the femur and tibia too much. The edges of the bone should be cut ∼0.5 mm at a time to minimize loss. Additionally, some mouse models may have smaller amounts of bone marrow cells than others, and may require isolation of more bone marrow to acquire the same amount of BMDM cells as wild type mice.
Problem 2
Generated cells are not viable.BMDM cultures will become nonadherent when contaminated. Mice should be thoroughly soaked with 70% ethanol before exposing the bone marrow. Feces and fur are inevitably close to the site of dissection, and exposed bone must not touch them. If possible, the isolation of bone marrow may be done in sterile conditions.
Problem 3
Western blot resulted in bands with too much background.As the volume of the lysate is typically <100 μL, this may occur when the supernatant of the lysate after centrifugation is inadequately aspirated, particularly when the sediment is aspirated. The steps following sonication should be done with care.
Resource availability
Lead contact
Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the Lead Contact, Kohjiro Ueki (uekik@ri.ncgm.go.jp).
Authors: Peter J Murray; Judith E Allen; Subhra K Biswas; Edward A Fisher; Derek W Gilroy; Sergij Goerdt; Siamon Gordon; John A Hamilton; Lionel B Ivashkiv; Toby Lawrence; Massimo Locati; Alberto Mantovani; Fernando O Martinez; Jean-Louis Mege; David M Mosser; Gioacchino Natoli; Jeroen P Saeij; Joachim L Schultze; Kari Ann Shirey; Antonio Sica; Jill Suttles; Irina Udalova; Jo A van Ginderachter; Stefanie N Vogel; Thomas A Wynn Journal: Immunity Date: 2014-07-17 Impact factor: 31.745
Authors: Chae Bok Lee; Kang In Lee; Young Jae Kim; In Taek Jang; Sintayehu Kebede Gurmessa; Eun Ha Choi; Nagendra Kumar Kaushik; Hwa-Jung Kim Journal: Biomedicines Date: 2022-05-26