Literature DB >> 33458708

Preparation and culture of bone marrow-derived macrophages from mice for functional analysis.

Gotaro Toda1, Toshimasa Yamauchi1, Takashi Kadowaki2, Kohjiro Ueki3.   

Abstract

The assessment of macrophage function has been a topic of intense discussion due to multiple subtypes. This protocol describes the collection of bone marrow cells from the femur and tibia of mice, differentiation into bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDM cells), and sampling from cultures. This protocol focuses on the efficient preparation of BMDM cells, providing a way to assess the function of macrophages. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Toda et al. (2020).
© 2020 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell Differentiation; Cell isolation; Immunology; Model Organisms

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33458708      PMCID: PMC7797923          DOI: 10.1016/j.xpro.2020.100246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  STAR Protoc        ISSN: 2666-1667


Before you begin

Prepare mice

Mice should be available sufficiently before the in vitro experiment. Although we have not experienced marked differences in the viability of harvested cells among differently aged mice between 6–12 weeks of age or between male/female mice, the mice used should be of the same age and sex in the same experiment. Mice used in this protocol can be fasted or fed ad libitum at time of collection of bone marrow cells. Cell viability should be evaluated in relation to wild type mice in mice with defects in hematopoietic cells.

Prepare reagents and equipment

Timing: 30 min 1 week before in vitro experiment. 1 h before collection of bone marrow cells. Add 10% FBS (heat inactivated) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin to DMEM high glucose (DMEM 10% FBS) and store at 4°C until preparation of the bone marrow culture medium. Keep DMEM (10% FBS) at 37°C. Add CSF-1 to obtain bone marrow culture medium after collection of bone marrow cells. Freshly prepare before harvesting bone marrow (Zhang et al., 2008). Prepare ice cold PBS (10 mL/ mouse) in 10 mL syringe with 23G needle, culture plate (one 12 well plate/ mouse), scissors, and forceps. Bring mice on site after preparation.

Key resources table

Materials and equipment

Step-by-step method details

Collection of bone marrow cells

Timing: 30 min Day 0 This step prepares the bone marrow cells including progenitors which will differentiate into bone marrow-derived macrophages after culture. The time it takes to start of culture in the bone marrow culture medium should be minimal to maximize cell yield and to avoid contamination. Euthanize mouse by an appropriate method approved by the supervising institution. Appropriately remove excess blood in the following steps. Soak with 70% ethanol. (Also see Troubleshooting problem 1) Remove skin and expose lower limb. Cut major muscles near the base of the lower limb to expose the hip joint. Cut femur near the base (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Illustration describing steps 1–5.

Illustration describing steps 1–5. Cut Achilles tendon and remove major muscles around tibia. Remove major muscles around femur (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Illustration describing steps 6 and 7.

Illustration describing steps 6 and 7. Cut at knee joint. Remove major muscles around tibia, and remove fibula (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Illustration describing steps 8 and 9.

Illustration describing steps 8 and 9. Remove the epiphyses of femur and tibia so that the bone marrow can be accessed from the ends with a 23G needle. This can be confirmed by poking the ends with a needle (Also see Troubleshooting problem 2). Wash the bone marrow into a 50 mL tube by slowly injecting approximately 2–3 mL PBS per bone. The bone marrow will come out from the other end. Make sure the PBS does not backflow, to avoid contamination. Keep the bone marrow on ice. Repeat with other lower limb (Figure 4).
Figure 4

Illustration describing steps 10–12.

Illustration describing steps 10–12. For collection of bone marrow from 5 mice or more, or if collection takes more than 1 h, use DMEM without FBS for washing bone marrow. Centrifuge bone marrow suspension at 200 × g, 5 min at 4°C. Decant or aspirate PBS. To remove erythrocytes resuspend in 1× lyse buffer on ice, and let sit for 3 min. Add 10 mL DMEM (10% FBS 1% penicillin streptomycin) and centrifuge suspension at 200 × g, 5 min at 4°C, and repeat if necessary.

Differentiation into bone marrow-derived macrophages

Resuspend bone marrow (approx. 1 × 107 live cells per mouse) in 1 mL bone marrow culture medium, and filter through a 100 μm cell strainer. Pipette suspension (approx. 1 × 107 live cells) into total volume of bone marrow culture medium (approx. 12 mL for 12 well plate). 6 well plates and 24 well plates can also be used. Add bone marrow culture medium to wells (1 mL/well for 12 well plate). Culture at 37°C 5% CO2. Add half this volume of bone marrow culture medium on day 4 (e.g., 500 μL/well for 12 well plate). Adherent cells should show 1–2 protrusions at low magnification.

Preparation for in vitro experiment

Timing: 10 min Day 6 This step describes the preparation for in vitro stimulation using BMDMs. FBS contains signaling peptides etc. that may obscure, for example, detection of phosphorylation in response to stimulation of interest. Therefore, a period of serum-free culture before stimulation is recommended in such experiments. Overnight culture in serum-free medium does not have a marked impact on cell viability, but baseline Akt phosphorylation is suppressed which makes detection of phosphorylation in response to in vitro stimulation clearer. Wash cells with sterile PBS, and change to DMEM 10% FBS, and continue culture at 37°C 5% CO2. For detection of phosphorylation signals etc., change to DMEM without FBS at this point. Timing: 10 min Day 7 (2 h before in vitro experiment) Change medium to DMEM without FBS if not already changed.

Sampling from bone marrow-derived macrophage cultures

Timing: 30 min to several hours This step describes sampling from BMDM cultures. To minimize altered signaling events, or gene expression, sampling directly from the culture plate is recommended. Change medium to medium containing stimulation of interest. After stimulation, wash cells twice with PBS, and aspirate. For creating a cell suspension, add 0.05% trypsin-EDTA (approx. 100 μL/well for 12 well plate) and incubate at 37°C for 3 min. Add DMEM (10% FBS, 1 mL/well for 12 well plate), dislodge the cells using a cell scraper, and transfer to a 5 mL round bottom tube. Centrifuge at 200 × g, 4°C for 3 min. Suspend cells in 1 mL FACS buffer for counting, and subsequent analysis. If sampling of protein or RNA takes place later, freeze the washed culture plate with liquid nitrogen, and keep in −80°C freezer. In the following steps, add extraction buffer directly to the wells, and pipette repeatedly until no adherent cells remain. Optionally, a cell scraper may be used to dislodge the cells. For extracting protein samples for western blot, add cell lysis buffer supplemented with 1× protease cocktail to the wells (approx. 100 μL/well for a 12 well plate), and transfer to a 1.5 mL sampling tube. Sonicate for 5 min at 4°C, and vortex. Centrifuge for 10 min at 10,000 × g and transfer supernatant to a 1.5 mL sampling tube. Avoid aspirating or contacting the sediment (Trouble shooting problem 3). 100–200 μg of protein is typically extracted. Add 1/3 volume of 4× Laemmli buffer, and boil for 10 min. Keep at −20°C until SDS-PAGE. For extracting RNA using RNeasy mini kit, add 350 μL buffer RLT to the wells. Final elution should use 50–100 μL TE. 5–10 μg RNA is typically extracted. Keep at −80°C until gene expression analysis.

Expected outcomes

From three male C57BL6/J mice at 8 weeks of age weighing 24.7 ± 0.8 g, (1.6 ± 0.2) × 107 live bone marrow cells were isolated. During culture, (1.2 ± 0.1) × 105 cells were adherent at day 4, and (1.7 ± 0.1) × 105 cells were adherent at day 7. Examples of gene expresion analyses using FACS, RT-PCR, and western blot are shown (Figures 5, 6, and 7).
Figure 5

FACS analysis of BMDM cell suspension

Over 90% of the cells were positive for CD11b and F4/80, which are markers for murine macrophages (Wynn et al., 2013).

Figure 6

Gene expression assessed by RT-PCR using RNA extracted from BMDM cultures stimulated overnight with 10 ng/mL LPS and 50 ng/mL IL-13

Genes known to be expressed by M1 and M2 macrophages could be detected (Martinez and Gordon, 2014; Wynn et al., 2013).

Figure 7

Akt phosphorylation assessed by western blot of protein extracted from BMDM cultures stimulated with 50 ng/mL IL-13

Signaling in response to IL-13 has been described by others (Brown Lobbins et al., 2018; Jiang et al., 2000).

FACS analysis of BMDM cell suspension Over 90% of the cells were positive for CD11b and F4/80, which are markers for murine macrophages (Wynn et al., 2013). Gene expression assessed by RT-PCR using RNA extracted from BMDM cultures stimulated overnight with 10 ng/mL LPS and 50 ng/mL IL-13 Genes known to be expressed by M1 and M2 macrophages could be detected (Martinez and Gordon, 2014; Wynn et al., 2013). Akt phosphorylation assessed by western blot of protein extracted from BMDM cultures stimulated with 50 ng/mL IL-13 Signaling in response to IL-13 has been described by others (Brown Lobbins et al., 2018; Jiang et al., 2000).

Limitations

The cultures are viable for at least 3–4 days after differentiation, but have little or no replicating potential after differentiation, and therefore the in vitro experiment should conclude without passage. Although the BMDM cultures generated using this protocol are useful for analyzing genes known to be expressed by multiple macrophage subtypes, they cannot be used to assess different macrophage functions between tissues (Toda et al., 2020; Weischenfeldt and Porse, 2008). Additionally, this protocol only covers the assessment of BMDM cells before polarization into different macrophage subsets as described by others (Wynn et al., 2013). The cells may be further cultured with IFN-γ, IL-4 etc. to assess the function of polarized macrophage subsets although one should be aware that functions of such strongly polarized macrophages only limitedly reflect the in vivo variety of macrophages (Murray et al., 2014). As assessment of macrophage function using unpolarized BMDM cultures generated as described in this protocol provides a view of cellular function without narrowing the scope of the analysis to a certain polarization, it provides candidates of cellular functions some of which in combination with in vivo analyses may subsequently prove to be of importance in physiological or pathological conditions. The BMDM cultures described in this protocol, as in all immune cell cultures do not completely reflect the variety of immune cells in vivo, and future development and utilization of single-cell techniques may be key to further analysis of immune cell function in high spatiotemporal resolution.

Troubleshooting

Problem 1

Generated cells are sparse.

Potential solution

BMDM cultures generated should be approximately 75% confluent. If cells are sparser, the amount of collected bone marrow may be inadequate perhaps due to cutting the edges of the femur and tibia too much. The edges of the bone should be cut ∼0.5 mm at a time to minimize loss. Additionally, some mouse models may have smaller amounts of bone marrow cells than others, and may require isolation of more bone marrow to acquire the same amount of BMDM cells as wild type mice.

Problem 2

Generated cells are not viable. BMDM cultures will become nonadherent when contaminated. Mice should be thoroughly soaked with 70% ethanol before exposing the bone marrow. Feces and fur are inevitably close to the site of dissection, and exposed bone must not touch them. If possible, the isolation of bone marrow may be done in sterile conditions.

Problem 3

Western blot resulted in bands with too much background. As the volume of the lysate is typically <100 μL, this may occur when the supernatant of the lysate after centrifugation is inadequately aspirated, particularly when the sediment is aspirated. The steps following sonication should be done with care.

Resource availability

Lead contact

Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the Lead Contact, Kohjiro Ueki (uekik@ri.ncgm.go.jp).

Materials availability

This protocol does not include unique materials.

Data and code availability

This protocol does not include data sets.
REAGENT or RESOURCESOURCEIDENTIFIER
Antibodies

PE Rat Anti-CD11bBD553311
APC anti-mouse F4/80 antibodyBioLegend123116
7-AADBD559925
Phospho-Akt (Ser473) Rabbit mAbCell Signaling9271
Phospho mTOR antibodyCell Signaling2971
ECL anti-rabbit IgG horseradish peroxidase lined whole antibodyGENA934-1ML
GAPDH rabbit monoclonal antibodyCell Signaling2118

Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins

Recombinant mouse IL-13R and D413-ML-005
Recombinant mouse CSF-1GibcoPMC2044
DMEM (high glucose)Gibco5796
Stain bufferBD554656
FBSBiowestS1650
Penicillin streptomycinGibco10378016
PBS tabletsTakaraT900
0.05% Trypsin-EDTAGibco25300-054
Cell lysis bufferCST9803
Complete protease inhibitor cocktailRoche11697498001
4× Laemmli sample bufferBio-Rad1610747

Experimental models: organisms/strains

C57BL6/JJackson Laboratory664

Oligonucleotides

IL-10 Fw GCTCTTACTGACTGGCATGAGN/AN/A
IL-10 Rv CGCAGCTCTAGGAGCATGTGN/AN/A
TNF-α Fw CTGAACTTCGGGGTGATCGGN/AN/A
TNF-α Rv GGCTTGTCACTCGAATTTTGAGAN/AN/A
Arg1 Fw CTCCAAGCCAAAGTCCTTAGAGN/AN/A
Arg1 Rv GGAGCTGTCATTAGGGACATCAN/AN/A

Software and algorithms

Prism 7GraphPadN/A
MS ExcelMicrosoftN/A
Photoshop CCAdobeN/A

Other

Cyclophillin probeApplied Biosystems4316034
Cell strainer (100 μm)Falcon352360
Lysing bufferBD555899
Cell scraperIWAKI9000-220-CS
RNeasy mini kitQIAGEN74106
Round bottom polystyrene tubesFalcon352058
Bone marrow culture mediumFinal concentration (mM or μM)
DMEMN/A
FBS10%
Penicillin streptomycin1%
M-CSF11 ng/mL (test multiple concentrations)
  8 in total

1.  Bone Marrow-Derived Macrophages (BMM): Isolation and Applications.

Authors:  Joachim Weischenfeldt; Bo Porse
Journal:  CSH Protoc       Date:  2008-12-01

Review 2.  IL-4/IL-13 signaling beyond JAK/STAT.

Authors:  H Jiang; M B Harris; P Rothman
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 10.793

Review 3.  Macrophage biology in development, homeostasis and disease.

Authors:  Thomas A Wynn; Ajay Chawla; Jeffrey W Pollard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The isolation and characterization of murine macrophages.

Authors:  Xia Zhang; Ricardo Goncalves; David M Mosser
Journal:  Curr Protoc Immunol       Date:  2008-11

5.  Chronic exposure of interleukin-13 suppress the induction of matrix metalloproteinase-1 by tumour necrosis factor α in normal and scleroderma dermal fibroblasts through protein kinase B/Akt.

Authors:  M L Brown Lobbins; B R Shivakumar; A E Postlethwaite; K A Hasty
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Macrophage activation and polarization: nomenclature and experimental guidelines.

Authors:  Peter J Murray; Judith E Allen; Subhra K Biswas; Edward A Fisher; Derek W Gilroy; Sergij Goerdt; Siamon Gordon; John A Hamilton; Lionel B Ivashkiv; Toby Lawrence; Massimo Locati; Alberto Mantovani; Fernando O Martinez; Jean-Louis Mege; David M Mosser; Gioacchino Natoli; Jeroen P Saeij; Joachim L Schultze; Kari Ann Shirey; Antonio Sica; Jill Suttles; Irina Udalova; Jo A van Ginderachter; Stefanie N Vogel; Thomas A Wynn
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 31.745

7.  Insulin- and Lipopolysaccharide-Mediated Signaling in Adipose Tissue Macrophages Regulates Postprandial Glycemia through Akt-mTOR Activation.

Authors:  Gotaro Toda; Kotaro Soeda; Yukiko Okazaki; Naoki Kobayashi; Yukari Masuda; Naoko Arakawa; Hirotsugu Suwanai; Yosuke Masamoto; Yoshihiko Izumida; Nozomu Kamei; Takayoshi Sasako; Ryo Suzuki; Tetsuya Kubota; Naoto Kubota; Mineo Kurokawa; Kazuyuki Tobe; Tetsuo Noda; Kenya Honda; Domenico Accili; Toshimasa Yamauchi; Takashi Kadowaki; Kohjiro Ueki
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 19.328

Review 8.  The M1 and M2 paradigm of macrophage activation: time for reassessment.

Authors:  Fernando O Martinez; Siamon Gordon
Journal:  F1000Prime Rep       Date:  2014-03-03
  8 in total
  13 in total

1.  Non-Thermal Plasma Jet-Treated Medium Induces Selective Cytotoxicity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis-Infected Macrophages.

Authors:  Chae Bok Lee; Kang In Lee; Young Jae Kim; In Taek Jang; Sintayehu Kebede Gurmessa; Eun Ha Choi; Nagendra Kumar Kaushik; Hwa-Jung Kim
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-05-26

2.  Staphylococcus aureus-induced immunosuppression mediated by IL-10 and IL-27 facilitates nasal colonisation.

Authors:  Alanna M Kelly; John M Leech; Sarah L Doyle; Rachel M McLoughlin
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 7.464

3.  Targeting PCSK9 Ameliorates Graft Vascular Disease in Mice by Inhibiting NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells.

Authors:  Yanqiang Zou; Zhang Chen; Xi Zhang; Jizhang Yu; Heng Xu; Jikai Cui; Yuan Li; Yuqing Niu; Cheng Zhou; Jiahong Xia; Jie Wu
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 8.786

4.  Implication of the IL-10-Expression Signature in the Pathogenicity of Leptospira-Infected Macrophages.

Authors:  Li-Fang Chou; Ting-Wen Chen; Huang-Yu Yang; Ya-Chung Tian; Ming-Yang Chang; Cheng-Chieh Hung; Chih-Ho Lai; Shen-Hsing Hsu; Chung-Ying Tsai; Yi-Ching Ko; Jang-Hau Lian; Chih-Wei Yang
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-05-31

5.  ThioredoxinA1 Controls the Oxidative Stress Response of Francisella tularensis Live Vaccine Strain (LVS).

Authors:  Zhuo Ma; Matthew Higgs; Maha Alqahtani; Chandra Shekhar Bakshi; Meenakshi Malik
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.476

6.  Lactate metabolism coordinates macrophage response and regeneration in zebrafish.

Authors:  Candice Bohaud; Jholy De La Cruz; Claudia Terraza; Audrey Barthelaix; Béryl Laplace-Builhé; Christian Jorgensen; Yoan Arribat; Farida Djouad
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 11.600

7.  Metformin alleviates inflammation through suppressing FASN-dependent palmitoylation of Akt.

Authors:  Wenfang Xiong; Kuo-Yang Sun; Yan Zhu; Xiaoqi Zhang; Yi-Hua Zhou; Xiaoping Zou
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 8.469

8.  A macrophage-T cell coculture model for severe tissue injury-induced T cell death.

Authors:  Jie Zhu; Jiayu Cao; Arthur Liesz; Stefan Roth
Journal:  STAR Protoc       Date:  2021-12-01

9.  Myeloid Wls expression is dispensable for skin wound healing and blood vessel regeneration.

Authors:  Seen Ling Sim; Antje Blumenthal; Simranpreet Kaur; Kiarash Khosrotehrani
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 6.055

10.  MiR-144-5p, an exosomal miRNA from bone marrow-derived macrophage in type 2 diabetes, impairs bone fracture healing via targeting Smad1.

Authors:  Dong Zhang; Yifan Wu; Zonghuan Li; Hairen Chen; Siyuan Huang; Chao Jian; Aixi Yu
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 10.435

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.