Literature DB >> 33458590

Myasthenia gravis: MuSK MG, late-onset MG and ocular MG.

Feza Deymeer1.   

Abstract

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease of the neuromuscular junction which affects all striated muscles, resulting in fluctuating weakness. Approaching MG as a disease with subgroups having different clinical, serological and genetic features is crucial in predicting the progression and planning treatment. Three relatively less frequently seen subtypes of MG are the subject of this review: MG with anti-MuSK antibodies (MuSK MG), non-thymomatous late-onset MG (LOMG), and ocular MG (OMG). In addition to reviewing the literature, mainly from a clinical point of view, our experience in each of the subgroups, based on close to 600 patients seen over a 10 year period, is related. MuSK MG is a severe disease with predominant bulbar involvement. It is more common in women and in early-onset patients. With the use of high dose corticosteroids, azathioprine and more recently rituximab, outcome is favorable, though the patients usually require higher maintenance doses of immunosuppressives. LOMG with onset ≥ 50 years of age is more common in men and ocular onset is common. Frequency of anti-AChR and anti-titin antibodies are high. Although it can be severe in some patients, response to treatment is usually very good. OMG is reported to be more frequent in men in whom the disease has a later onset. Anti-AChR antibodies are present in about half of the patients. Generalization is less likely when symptoms remain confined to ocular muscles for 2 years. Low dose corticosteroids are usually sufficient. Thyroid disease is the most common autoimmune disease accompanying all three subgroups. ©2020 Gaetano Conte Academy - Mediterranean Society of Myology, Naples, Italy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Late-onset MG; MuSK MG; Myasthenia gravis; Ocular MG

Year:  2020        PMID: 33458590      PMCID: PMC7783433          DOI: 10.36185/2532-1900-038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Myol        ISSN: 1128-2460


Introduction

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease of the neuromuscular junction which affects all striated muscles, resulting in fluctuating weakness [1]. MG is mostly caused by antibodies against the acetylcholine receptor (AChR) and rarely by antibodies against muscle specific kinase (MuSK). In some of the patients without any detected antibodies (seronegative MG, SN MG), anti-AChR and anti-MuSK antibodies can be found with finer techniques [2]. The clinical significance of anti-LRP4 antibodies, many times coexisting with the classical antibodies in the same patient, is unknown. Approaching MG as a disease with subgroups having different clinical, serological and genetic features [3-5] is crucial in predicting the progression and planning treatment. MG is associated with thymoma in 10-15% of patients. Among those without a thymoma, the largest subgroup consists of young women (age < 50 years) with anti-AChR antibodies. An increasingly important subgroup is MG with later onset (≥ 50 years). A very small subgroup is caused by antibodies against the MuSK antigen. MG usually tends to affect the oculobulbar and extremity muscles in all of these patients. In a small subgroup, it affects only the ocular muscles. Three relatively less frequently seen subtypes of MG are the subject of this review: MG with anti-MuSK antibodies (MuSK MG), late-onset MG (LOMG), and ocular MG (OMG). Attempt was made to define the subgroups carefully with particular attention given to distinguishing generalized from ocular disease. In addition to reviewing the literature, mainly from a clinical point of view, our experience in each of the subgroups, based on close to 600 patients seen over a 10 year period, is related. To put our data on the subgroups into perspective, it is necessary to describe our cohort first.

Istanbul University MG cohort

Our cohort consisted of 576 patients, derived from our MG Database, who applied for the first time to the Neuromuscular Outpatient Clinic, Neurology Department, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University (IU) during a 10 year period between 2001 and 2010. It is an unselected group with consecutive patients, subjected to the same criteria for inclusion in a set period of time. Some patients with MuSK MG from this cohort were reported in two articles [6,7], they consisted of all MuSK MG patients seen until 2005 [6] and until 2009 [7]. Patients with LOMG in this cohort were also reported [8]. A manuscript on ocular MG, again with patients in this cohort, is in preparation. Evaluating the frequency of the subgroups, thymoma-associated MG (TAMG) was found in 14%. Early-onset (< 50 years) generalized MG was the most common subgroup comprising close to 40% of the cohort. Late-onset (≥ 50 years) generalized MG and ocular MG (OMG) each made up about one fifth of the patients. MuSK MG comprised 7% of the cohort (Fig. 1). Taking both onset age and antibody status into consideration (Fig. 2), it was striking to note that the subgroups of MuSK MG and SN MG were extremely rare in older ages. Also interesting was the fact that thymoma was more common in younger patients in this cohort. Antibody status of ocular MG, about half with anti-AChR antibodies, is not indicated in the figure to avoid confusion. Almost all patients with thymoma had anti-AChR antibodies.
Figure 1.

Subgroups of MG (576 patients).

Figure 2.

Subgroups of MG according to onset age (576 patients).

Gender differences among the subgroups were noteworthy. Women predominated in early-onset generalized AChR MG and MuSK MG. Women also predominated in seronegative generalized MG, both early-onset and late-onset. Men predominated in late-onset generalized AChR MG. The two genders were comparable in ocular MG and TAMG (Fig. 3).
Figure 3.

Subgroups of MG. Percentages of gender (576 patients).

Our percentages in general reflected what is reported in the literature, except that thymoma was more common in younger patients in our cohort.

MuSK MG

MG with antibodies to the postsynaptically located MuSK protein is a relatively newly defined disease. It constitutes less than 10% of the MG patients, being more prevalent in the Mediterranean countries as compared to the northern ones in Europe, but more prevalent in the north as compared to the south in China [5]. The antibodies are mainly of the IgG4 class as opposed to IgG1 in MG with anti-AChR antibodies (AChR MG) [2]. There is a specific association with HLA-DRB1∗14, -DRB1∗16 and -DQB1∗05 HLA [9,10]. Onset age peaks in the late 30’s and it is uncommon in prepubertal and elderly patients [6,11]. The disease is reported to be more common in women [11] although female preponderance was found to be comparable to AChR MG and SN MG in one report [6]. Clinically, it constitutes the most severe form of MG, paralleled by TAMG [5]. Bulbar, neck and respiratory muscles are involved with fast progression of the disease to life-threatening symptoms [11,12]. Dropped head syndrome with neck extensor muscle weakness can be the presenting symptom [13,14]. Ocular muscles are frequently mildly involved, and conjugate limitation of eye movements which is exceptional in MG can occur in MuSK MG [11]. Extremity muscles are usually spared or mildly affected. In those with ocular onset, generalization occurs in a short time. Rare patients generalize after a few years and pure ocular MG is extremely rare. Interestingly, we had one patient with onset at 3 years [15] who remained with purely ocular symptoms for a prolonged period before generalization, similar to another reported patient with MuSK MG [16], and in accordance with the frequent course of prepubertal-onset patients [17]. There are difficulties in diagnosis when the onset is indolent and fluctuations are not evident. At least half of the patients do not respond to anticholinesterases and a few can get worse, fasciculations and cramps are common [14]. Decrement is usually not present in the extremity muscles with repetitive nerve stimulation. The muscle with the best yield was found to be the orbicularis oculi [18]. Needle EMG may show a myopathic pattern. Corticosteroids are the most effective drugs, but they are needed in high doses in many patients. Usually a second immunosuppressive is required at an early stage. Plasma exchange is considered to be more beneficial than IVIg in MuSK MG [19]. Although the disease is usually severe, many patients eventually do well with appropriate therapy [11,14]. We had previously compared all MuSK MG and generalized SN MG patients registered in our MG database with consecutive non-thymomatous 161 AChR MG patients [6]. Their outcome with conventional therapy was similar to AChR MG patients; however, they required higher dose of maintenance corticosteroid therapy. Tongue atrophy has been noted in MuSK MG, but the role of refractoriness and the use of long term high dose corticosteroids is questioned [20]. There are MuSK MG patients who are clinically not distinguishable from non-MuSK MG [12]. Likewise, some MuSK MG patients can be easily treated. We had reported [7] that fast and good response within 3 months of starting corticosteroids predicted good outcome in MuSK MG patients. These patients, comprising one third of the study population, had pharmacological remission or minimal manifestations on a mean low maintenance dose of 6 mg/day (or as is generally done, 12 mg on alternate days) of prednisolone, usually with additional azathioprine. Newer drugs such as rituximab have changed the scene in MuSK MG, particularly for refractory patients [21-23]. It is considered to be an early therapeutic option in the patients without a satisfactory initial response to conventional immunosuppressives [19]. Symptomatic treatment with 3,4-diamynopyridine (3,4-DAP) and albuterol is also being considered [11]. Over the years, a better outcome is noted in MuSK MG patients, attributed to early diagnosis and better treatment [11]. It has been difficult to evaluate the effect of thymectomy, because of the confounding effect of steroids, which have usually been started before the surgery. The pathology of the thymus showed involution in most patients [24], further suggesting that the thymus may not play a similar role in MuSK MG as compared to AChR MG. Thymectomy is now not considered to be indicated in MuSK MG. There are exceptional cases with small thymomas [25]. In parallel to the other subgroups of MG, thyroid disease was the most frequent autoimmune disease in MuSK MG [11]. One point needs to be emphasized. An important differential diagnosis of MuSK MG is with bulbar amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), particularly because of fasciculations [26] and myotonic discharges [27] in rare patients with MuSK MG. Absence of definite fluctuations, absence of response to anticholinesterases, and difficulty in finding decrement in classically-examined muscles in repetitive nerve stimulation in some patients with MuSK MG may suggest ALS in the face of bulbar symptoms/head drop without ocular symptoms. Even without fasciculations, the differential diagnosis of MuSK MG and bulbar ALS can be difficult. It is sometimes difficult to distinguish from ALS the speech in MuSK MG which may lack the nasal quality of typical MG. Furthermore, mild fluctuations, mild response to anticholinesterases and decrement can all be seen in ALS. Needle EMG of the extremities is usually normal when the symptoms are confined to bulbar muscles in ALS. Caution is necessary in the diagnosis of some cases with bulbar symptoms.

IU MG cohort: MuSK MG

In our cohort of 576 patients, 38 had MuSK MG. One patient, a man with onset at age 39, had a father with LOMG, who was negative for both anti-AChR and -MuSK antibodies. In the cohort, median age of onset was 34 years (range of 3-66 years). Below age 16, there was only one patient with onset at 3 years [15]. Onset age was ≥ 50 in 5 patients. Eighty-two percent were women. Onset with ocular symptoms was present in 15 patients (39%). None had ocular MG throughout the entire period of observation. Onset with bulbar symptoms was seen in 12 patients (32%). Three patients had head drop as an onset symptom. The rest had oculobulbar or extremity onset. Most of our patients did not respond to anticholinesterases. However, some patients responded to lower doses so that anticholinesterases can still be an option to be used with caution in MuSK MG. Of note is the fact that the initial test dose was very good even in some of the non-responders. About half of the patients had hypersensitivity to anticholinesterases. As reported, we found that repetitive nerve stimulation of the orbicularis oculi muscles yielded the best results, both in the frequency and in the amount of decrement. Maximum severity and outcome were evaluated in 36 patients excluding the two patients who had been seen only once. Median disease duration was 8 years (range: 1-20 years) and median follow-up was 6 years (range: 1-13 years). Using the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Classification [28], 75% were MGFA Class 3 or above; 31% of these were 4b and 3 had been intubated (MGFA Class 5). Three patients had tongue atrophy; it was notable that two of these patients had been treated late and the response had taken a long time. Four patients had fasciculations, usually related to the beginning of MG or to exacerbations. Treatment included corticosteroids and azathioprine. Prednisolone at 1 mg/kg/day or 60 mg/day was usually needed and it was continued for a longer period than usual in some patients. A look at the outcome revealed that two patients had died of MG. Twenty patients (56%) had reached MGFA post-intervention status (PIS) [28] of pharmacological remission or minimal manifestations with a mean maintenance dose of about 10 mg/day of prednisolone, but there was none with complete stable remission. Two were unchanged and the rest had improved to some degree. At the time of this cohort, treatment of MuSK MG was a little different in that we did not use rituximab and had not yet discontinued performing thymectomies. In fact, 23 patients had been thymectomized. No patient in our cohort had a thymoma. In most of these patients, corticosteroids had been started before thymectomy and in a few within 3-4 months after thymectomy so that it was impossible to evaluate the effect of thymectomy properly. Involution of the thymus was the main pathological result in these patients with a few showing mild hyperplasia. Overall, it is not possible to say that thymectomy has any effect in MuSK MG.

Late-onset MG

The prevalence of LOMG has increased in recent years, [29] worldwide [30]. It is not clear whether the increase reflects a biological phenomenon[31] or has been influenced by increased awareness, availability of the AChR antibody assay [29,32] and longer lifespan [29]. LOMG is different from early-onset MG (EOMG) with respect to demographic-clinical characteristics as well as serological properties. Specific HLA associations of LOMG have been discovered [33,34]. Comparison between studies on LOMG is somewhat difficult because of different cut-off ages used to distinguish LOMG from EOMG, and the inclusion/exclusion of thymoma. Despite the difficulties, there seems to be consensus on many characteristics of LOMG. The percentage of men is higher in LOMG [8,17,35-37]. Anti-AChR antibodies were present in over 80% [8,17,35-38]. A rising frequency with higher decades of the percentage of anti-AChR antibodies [8,37] was reported, with 93% in very-late-onset MG (≥ 65 years) [37]. Anti-MuSK antibodies were found to be uncommon after 65-70 years of age [11,37]. The implication of these findings is that one has to be extremely cautious when diagnosing MG in double seronegative patients in the elderly and other causes have to be sought diligently. Anti-titin antibodies were present in one third to over one half of the LOMG patients [8,38-40], being more frequent in LOMG than in EOMG. They increased in higher decades in LOMG [8,40]. Anti-titin antibodies were not found to be a poor prognostic factor in LOMG in two studies [8,40]. Ocular onset was more frequent in LOMG [8,17,36,37,41]. Myasthenic crisis occurred in 6-11% of the patients [8,17,36,37]. Although a higher percentage of patients presented with life-threatening events at onset, they responded better to medications; those over 65 were particularly better than early-onset patients in terms of drug requirements and drug refractoriness [37]. At the end of follow-up, over 80% were reported to be improved or better [8,17,35,42]. Beneficial effect of thymectomy in LOMG has been reported, but it is usually not advised beyond age 55. Thyroid disease was reported to be the most frequent autoimmune disease accompanying LOMG [8,36].

IU MG cohort: Late-onset MG

In an attempt to understand more about non-thymomatous generalized LOMG and its outcome, we analyzed separately 95 of the LOMG patients with generalized symptoms (ocular MG excluded) who had been followed for ≥ 3 years in the same cohort. Although reported [8], it might be useful to emphasize some of the findings. Men constituted 63% of the patients. Onset was ocular in 62%, bulbar in 23% and in the extremities in 15%. Anti-AChR antibodies were positive in 84% and anti-MuSK antibodies in only 5%. Anti-titin antibodies were present in 61%. Half of the patients were MGFA Class 3 or above with myasthenic crisis in 6%. Outcome was good with 63% reaching MGFA PIS of complete stable remission, pharmacological remission or minimal manifestations with a mean maintenance dose of about 5 mg/day of prednisolone and a further 24% were improved. Patients in whom azathioprine was added to prednisolone did significantly better than those receiving only prednisolone. Another finding in the study was that many patients with mild disease who received a low maximum dose of prednisolone (≤ 30 mg/day), usually together with azathioprine, had a favorable outcome, implying that low-dose prednisolone with additional azathioprine may be sufficient in mild disease of older people. Thymectomy, done in 12 patients, was not found to be useful although it is not easy to evaluate thymectomy when corticosteroids are used.

Ocular MG

Ocular MG (OMG) refers to patients whose symptoms are confined to ocular muscles (levator palpebrae superioris and extraocular muscles), resulting in ptosis and diplopia; orbicularis oculi muscles are variably weak. Ocular muscles are involved in about 50% of patients at onset of MG. In about half of these patients, generalization occurs to non-ocular muscles, leaving about one fourth of patients with purely ocular symptoms for a prolonged/indefinite period [44-46]. Generalization usually occurs within one year, mostly within 2 years and it is uncommon after 2 years [44-46]. Generalization is reported to be more likely in anti-AChR positive [47,48] and TAMG [49]. Purely ocular MG is more common in Asians, particularly in juvenile-onset patients [50]. It is reported to be more frequent in men [51,52]. Spontaneous remissions with a mean of 4-5 years are reported to occur, mainly at earlier stages of the disease [46,51]. When a patient presents with ocular symptoms, there are several clinical clues which make the diagnosis of MG more likely. Complete or almost complete unilateral ptosis without pupillary changes, one sided ptosis alternating with ptosis on the other side, definite improvement in the mornings and presence of remissions are very suggestive of the diagnosis of MG. Ptosis can be mild. Eye movement limitation is usually asymmetrical, it can mimick all cranial nerve palsies as well as internuclear ophthalmoplegia. Diagnosis is easy when anti-AChR antibodies, present in about half of them, are detected. Anti-MuSK antibodies are extremely rare in MG with prolonged pure ocular symptoms. When antibodies are not detected, diagnosis can be difficult in some patients. Response to anticholinesterases may not be present in some patients; on the other hand, other entities such as intracranial mass lesions may show a positive response, usually requiring cranial magnetic resonance imaging for the differential diagnosis [47]. Repetitive nerve stimulation is not very useful with purely ocular symptoms. Single fiber EMG is very sensitive, but one has to be careful remembering that it is not specific to MG [53]. One other caveat about single fiber EMG is in order: Presence of abnormalities in limb muscles of a patient with OMG does not indicate generalization [54], the diagnosis of generalized MG is clinical. When all tests are negative in a patient with ocular symptoms, a trial of corticosteroids may be necessary. In the differential diagnosis, mitochondrial myopathy (progressive external ophthalmoplegia, PEO) must be considered. Diplopia is not a feature of PEO; however, ptosis can be asymmetrical and fluctuations can be present, making the differential diagnosis with MG difficult. Oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy is usually bilateral and without eye movement limitation, at least for a long time. Congenital myasthenic syndromes usually start in infancy and it is then easy to eliminate MG. The distinction with thyroid ophthalmopathy can be difficult. In thyroid ophthalmopathy, ptosis is rare; esotropia (inward deviation of the eye) and hypotropia (downward deviation of the eye) are usually present since muscles causing restriction are medial rectus and inferior rectus. Thus, ptosis and exotropia (outward deviation of the eye) are suggestive of MG in a patient with thyroid ophthalmopathy [55]. Anticholinesterases provide symptomatic treatment for some patients with ptosis, but they are usually not useful for diplopia since the required precise alignment cannot be achieved [50]. Corticosteroids have caused debates on whether they are beneficial or not [50]. Observational studies [47,56] and one clinical trial [57] with a small number of patients (11 patients) have found them to be effective. Generalization appeared to be less likely in the patients who received immunosuppressives. It is emphasized that low doses are sufficient: About 25 mg/day or twice the dose on alternate days usually results in pharmacological remission. A real concern is the appearance of relapses upon discontinuation of steroids in many patients, necessitating long term administration with small doses. High dose intravenous methylprednisone has also been advocated [58]. Azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil have been found to be beneficial [50] and again lower than the standard doses may be sufficient in OMG. It takes a few months for them to take effect so that they are usually used as additive drugs. However, they can be given as the sole therapeutic agent in selected patients. Intravenous immunoglobulins do not improve the symptoms [59]. Thymectomy, reported to be beneficial in some patients [60], is usually not considered to be indicated in OMG, although some centers might have revised their indications after the advent of videothoracoscopic thymectomy. Eye patches for diplopia, prisms when eye movement limitation is mild and eyelid crutches for ptosis can be useful. There are rare patients who do not improve and have severe symptoms/signs despite all therapy. In these patients, if the signs are chronic and stable, blepharoplasty can be a good option, taking care not to cause the diplopia to be more disturbing once the ptosis is alleviated.

IU MG cohort: Ocular MG

In our cohort, 101 patients with a median disease duration of 8 years remained with purely ocular symptoms/signs throughout the entire period of observation. Two of the patients had thymomas. In the cohort, almost equal distribution was present regarding gender as well as onset age with very slight preponderance of men and early-onset. In patients with early-onset, women predominated while men predominated in late-onset. About half of the patients were anti-AChR positive. Low dose prednisolone of 15-30 mg/day was sufficient in many patients. Addition of azathioprine, sometimes also at a low dose, appeared to be beneficial. Azathioprine was used as a single agent successfully in selected patients. We have also found that several courses of intravenous methylprednisone pulse, alone or in addition to oral steroids, was very helpful in difficult cases. Myasthenia generalized after 2 years in another small group of patients. The majority of the patients were anti-AChR positive. Presence of thymoma was another risk factor for generalization. The two patients with anti-MuSK antibodies also generalized after several years.

Conclusions

In this review, the importance of analyzing the subgroups separately was emphasized because each has its own characteristics and different treatment approaches. Thymectomy, a very important treatment in MG, is not considered to be a widely-accepted therapeutic option in any of these subgroups. Corticosteroids are useful in all of the subgroups; however, while MuSK MG patients need high doses, low doses are usually effective in OMG, and LOMG patients can also respond well to low doses. Additional immunosuppressives are usually needed in order to taper corticosteroids to low maintenance doses and perhaps to be able to discontinue them. With the advent of new therapies, the differences between the subgroups are likely to play a more important role. Subgroups of MG (576 patients). Subgroups of MG according to onset age (576 patients). Subgroups of MG. Percentages of gender (576 patients).
  59 in total

1.  Strong association of MuSK antibody-positive myasthenia gravis and HLA-DR14-DQ5.

Authors:  E H Niks; J B M Kuks; B O Roep; G W Haasnoot; W Verduijn; B E P B Ballieux; M H De Baets; A Vincent; J J G M Verschuuren
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-06-13       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 2.  AAEM minimonograph #25: single-fiber electromyography.

Authors:  D B Sanders; E V Stålberg
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.217

Review 3.  Update on Ocular Myasthenia Gravis.

Authors:  Stacy V Smith; Andrew G Lee
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 4.  Myasthenia gravis: recommendations for clinical research standards. Task Force of the Medical Scientific Advisory Board of the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America.

Authors:  A Jaretzki; R J Barohn; R M Ernstoff; H J Kaminski; J C Keesey; A S Penn; D B Sanders
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2000-07-12       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Late-onset myasthenia not on the increase: a nationwide register study in Denmark, 1996-2009.

Authors:  E G Pedersen; J Hallas; K Hansen; P E H Jensen; D Gaist
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 6.089

6.  Prognosis of ocular myasthenia in Korea: a retrospective multicenter analysis of 202 patients.

Authors:  Yoon-Ho Hong; Seok-Beom Kwon; Byung-Jo Kim; Byoung Joon Kim; Seung Hyun Kim; Jong Kuk Kim; Kyung-Seok Park; Ki-Jong Park; Jung-Joon Sung; Eun Hee Sohn; Yeong-Bae Lee; Dushin Jeong; In Soo Joo; Byung-Ok Choi; Young-Chul Choi
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 3.181

7.  Long remission in muscle-specific kinase antibody-positive juvenile myasthenia.

Authors:  Banu Anlar; Vuslat Yilmaz; Güher Saruhan-Direskeneli
Journal:  Pediatr Neurol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.372

8.  Genome-Wide Association Study of Late-Onset Myasthenia Gravis: Confirmation of TNFRSF11A and Identification of ZBTB10 and Three Distinct HLA Associations.

Authors:  Michael F Seldin; Omar K Alkhairy; Annette T Lee; Janine A Lamb; Jon Sussman; Ritva Pirskanen-Matell; Fredrik Piehl; Jan J G M Verschuuren; Anna Kostera-Pruszczyk; Piotr Szczudlik; David McKee; Angelina H Maniaol; Hanne F Harbo; Benedicte A Lie; Arthur Melms; Henri-Jean Garchon; Nicholas Willcox; Peter K Gregersen; Lennart Hammarstrom
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 6.354

9.  Three types of striational antibodies in myasthenia gravis.

Authors:  Shigeaki Suzuki; Kimiaki Utsugisawa; Yuriko Nagane; Norihiro Suzuki
Journal:  Autoimmune Dis       Date:  2011-07-17

Review 10.  International consensus guidance for management of myasthenia gravis: Executive summary.

Authors:  Donald B Sanders; Gil I Wolfe; Michael Benatar; Amelia Evoli; Nils E Gilhus; Isabel Illa; Nancy Kuntz; Janice M Massey; Arthur Melms; Hiroyuki Murai; Michael Nicolle; Jacqueline Palace; David P Richman; Jan Verschuuren; Pushpa Narayanaswami
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  3 in total

1.  Cardiac disorders worsen the final outcome in myasthenic crisis undergoing non-invasive mechanical ventilation: a retrospective 20-year study from a single center.

Authors:  Erika Iori; Alessandra Ariatti; Marco Mazzoli; Elisabetta Bastia; Manuela Gozzi; Virginia Agnoletto; Alessandro Marchioni; Giuliana Galassi
Journal:  Acta Myol       Date:  2022-03-31

2.  Clinical Efficacy of Immunoglobulin Combined with Glucocorticoids in the Treatment of Oculomotor Myasthenia Gravis in Children and the Effect on Serum Immunity.

Authors:  Lijun Fan; Yahui Yang; Fan Zhang; Fei Huang
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 2.809

3.  Studying the relationship between clinical features and mental health among late-onset myasthenia gravis patients.

Authors:  Lu Yu; Li Qiu; Hao Ran; Qian Ma; Ya-Ru Lu; Wei-Bin Liu
Journal:  World J Psychiatry       Date:  2022-03-19
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.