| Literature DB >> 29377162 |
Angela Vincent1, Saif Huda1, Michelangelo Cao1, Hakan Cetin1, Inga Koneczny1, Pedro M Rodriguez Cruz1, Leslie Jacobson1, Stuart Viegas1, Saiju Jacob1, Mark Woodhall1, Akiko Nagaishi1, Angelina Maniaol1, Valentina Damato1, M Isabel Leite1, Judith Cossins1, Richard Webster1, Jacqueline Palace1, David Beeson1.
Abstract
Antibodies to the acetylcholine receptor (AChR) have been recognized for over 40 years and have been important in the diagnosis of myasthenia gravis (MG), and its recognition in patients of different ages and thymic pathologies. The 10-20% of patients who do not have AChR antibodies are now known to comprise different subgroups, the most commonly reported of which is patients with antibodies to muscle-specific kinase (MuSK). The use of cell-based assays has extended the repertoire of antibody tests to clustered AChRs, low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4, and agrin. Autoantibodies against intracellular targets, namely cortactin, titin, and ryanodine receptor (the latter two being associated with the presence of thymoma), may also be helpful as biomarkers in some patients. IgG4 MuSK antibodies are clearly pathogenic, but the coexisting IgG1, IgG2, and IgG3 antibodies, collectively, have effects that question the dominance of IgG4 as the sole pathologic factor in MuSK MG. After a brief historical review, we define the different subgroups and summarize the antibody characteristics. Experiments to demonstrate the in vitro and in vivo pathogenic roles of MuSK antibodies are discussed.Entities:
Keywords: active and passive immunization; clustered acetylcholine receptor; low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4; muscle-specific kinase; myasthenia gravis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29377162 DOI: 10.1111/nyas.13592
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci ISSN: 0077-8923 Impact factor: 5.691