Thae Thae Min1, Montarop Yamabhai1. 1. Molecular Biotechnology Laboratory, School of Biotechnology, Institute of Agricultural Technology, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand.
Abstract
The single-chain variable fragment (scFv) of monoclonal antibodies is a promising recombinant nanostructure for various medical applications, including bioimaging and targeted therapy. While numerous scFv antibodies against eukaryotic cell surface proteins (especially cancer biomarkers) have been generated and engineered to suit various purposes, only a few specific scFv against bacterial cell surfaces have been developed, especially those of human origin. Recent incidents of emerging multidrug-resistant pathogenic bacteria and the realization of the importance of a balanced microbiota on the health of the host has led to more interests in the development of recombinant antibacterial antibodies as a detection probe or targeted therapy for bacterial infections. This study reports the generation of two specific human antibacterial scFv using phage display antibody technology. The recombinant scFv fragments of about 30 kDa and a diameter of 5 nm were produced and purified from engineered Escherichia coli that can enhance cytosolic disulfide bond formation. As a proof of principle, Propionibacterium acnes and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were used as model Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, respectively. Specificity at the strain and species level to both planktonic and biofilm forms of these bacteria were demonstrated in various assay formats, namely, ELISA, flow cytometry, western blot, immunofluorescence, and electron microscopy via the hexa-histidine tag. This recombinant scFv generation platform can be applied for other bacteria, and since the scFv obtained has a benefit of being a human origin, it could be conveniently engineered for various therapeutic or theranostic applications with minimized adverse immunoreaction.
The single-chain variable fragment (scFv) of monoclonal antibodies is a promising recombinant nanostructure for various medical applications, including bioimaging and targeted therapy. While numerous scFv antibodies against eukaryotic cell surface proteins (especially cancer biomarkers) have been generated and engineered to suit various purposes, only a few specific scFv against bacterial cell surfaces have been developed, especially those of human origin. Recent incidents of emerging multidrug-resistant pathogenic bacteria and the realization of the importance of a balanced microbiota on the health of the host has led to more interests in the development of recombinant antibacterial antibodies as a detection probe or targeted therapy for bacterial infections. This study reports the generation of two specific human antibacterial scFv using phage display antibody technology. The recombinant scFv fragments of about 30 kDa and a diameter of 5 nm were produced and purified from engineered Escherichia coli that can enhance cytosolic disulfide bond formation. As a proof of principle, Propionibacterium acnes and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were used as model Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, respectively. Specificity at the strain and species level to both planktonic and biofilm forms of these bacteria were demonstrated in various assay formats, namely, ELISA, flow cytometry, western blot, immunofluorescence, and electron microscopy via the hexa-histidine tag. This recombinant scFv generation platform can be applied for other bacteria, and since the scFv obtained has a benefit of being a human origin, it could be conveniently engineered for various therapeutic or theranostic applications with minimized adverse immunoreaction.
Phage display antibody
technology, one of the most popular methods
for the generation of recombinant antibodies, has recently been awarded
the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for the year 2018.[1] The key advantage of this technology relies on the simplicity
but powerful affinity selection (bio-panning) procedure and the direct
linkage between the displayed antibody and its encoding gene within
the virion genome.[2] Recombinant antibodies
against a desired target can be identified directly from diverse repertoires
of antibody genes, generating high-affinity binding sites without
the constraint imposed by classical methods for generating either
polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies.[3] Since
this method does not depend on an animal’s immune system, antibodies
to a wide variety of antigens, including molecules that cannot stimulate
the immune system of animals, such as small molecule haptens and self-antigens
have been successfully isolated using this technology.[4] Various forms of antigen-binding fragments, including Fab
and scFv have been cloned and displayed on the filamentous bacteriophage
M13.[5] ScFv is a nanostructure that consists
of light and heavy chain variable domains of immunoglobulins of mammals,
linked with a peptide linker (G4S)3. One scFv
fragment has a molecular weight of about 30 kDa and a diameter of
5 nm, which is about one-fifth the size of the parental IgG molecule.[6,7] Once the sequence of scFv against any target has been identified,
it can be further engineered into various formats including whole
immunoglobulin (IgG) monoclonal antibodies and bispecific antibodies
or fabricated into various nanoparticles for both therapeutic and
diagnostic purposes.[8]Most of the
research and development on recombinant antibodies
mainly focuses on cancer. Several hundred monoclonal antibodies have
been approved or are in clinical trial stages for the treatment of
cancer and autoimmune diseases.[9] Until
now, only a handful of publications regarding the generation of recombinant
antibodies against infectious micro-organisms have been published.[10,11] The emergence of multidrug-resistant pathogenic bacteria as well
as the concern for a balanced microbiota have led to more interest
in generating recombinant antibodies against pathogenic bacteria.[12]The model Gram-negative bacteria in this
study, P. aeruginosa, is one of the
WHO prioritized pathogens
for which research and development of new antibiotics are critically
needed.[13] Some research groups used molecular
targets, such as purified recombinant proteins of P.
aeruginosa,[14−18] whereas others used whole bacterial cells in suspension as targets
for affinity selection.[19,20] All carried out affinity
selection using peptide display phage libraries, and from this, anti-P. aeruginosa peptides were identified. On the other
hand, a study group from MedImmune Ltd., UK,[21,22] used P. aeruginosa whole cells as
a target for affinity selection against a humanscFv library derived
from patients who had recently recovered from P. aeruginosa infections and identified a scFv against P. aeruginosaexopolysaccharide residue (Psl). Another study group used the recombinant
exotoxin A of P. aeruginosa to do affinity
selection against a humanscFv phage display library based on 60 Thai
blood donors and isolated anti-exotoxin A scFv clones.[23,24] To the best of our knowledge, only the anti-Psl scFv of MedImmune
Ltd. group has been developed into an anti-pseudomonal drug candidate.The model Gram-positive bacteria of this study, P. acnes, have been used as an affinity selection
target by one study group.[25] They generated
a scFv display phage library from human peripheral blood mononuclear
cells, which were immunized in vitro with heat-killed P. acnes and three anti-P. acnes scFv clones were identified, but there was no known further development
from those clones.Biopharmaceuticals could become a reliable
resource to fight back
multidrug- and pandrug-resistant bacteria, which has been a global
concern. In 2017, multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa caused an estimated 32,600 infections among hospitalized patients
and 2700 estimated deaths in the US alone. It has been estimated that
humandeaths attributable to antimicrobial resistance (AMR) will surpass
that of cancer in 2050 and the global GDP loss related to AMR will
be trillions of USD.[26,27] Recently, cartography of opportunistic
pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes in a tertiary hospital environment,
from genomic and metagenomic analysis, has been reported.[28,29] Therefore, obtaining scFv nanostructures against living bacteria,
which could be further engineered to be used as alternative diagnostic
and therapeutic strategies to combat deadly bacterial infections,
is highly attractive.This study reports an efficient method
for the generation of specific
human scFvs against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria
using phage display technology.
Results and Discussion
Two opportunistic bacteria with different cell surface structures
were used as model bacteria in this study because they have important
clinical relevance and are easier to handle with a standard biosafety
level in a general laboratory. The procedures presented in this study
could be adopted for the generation of scFvs to other important pathogenic
bacteria with no current effective treatment.
Affinity Selection against P. acnes and P. aeruginosa
A summary
of the affinity selection results is shown in Table . After the first round of selection against P. acnes (DMST 14916), 844 colonies of TG1 strain E. coli infected with eluted virions were obtained.
Then, 576 colonies were manually picked and were subjected to monoclonal
phage ELISA. Three virion clones, eventually designated as yPac1A8,
yPac1E4, and yPac1E7, which showed a two-fold higher OD signal against P. acnes than the negative control (1% BSA), were
selected for binding re-confirmation by phage ELISA and DNA sequence
analysis. The result revealed that they possessed unique scFv sequences;
however, the clone yPac1E7 had an amber stop codon (TAG) within its
open reading frame. Binding confirmation by scFv ELISA of two soluble
scFv clones (yPac1A8 and yPac1E4) produced from the non-suppressor
strain of E. coli (HB2151) proved that
only clone yPac1A8 showed good binding (OD value was two times higher
than 1% BSA control, data not shown). Therefore, yPac1A8 was selected
for expression in pET-21d (+) for further analysis.
Table 1
Summary of Affinity Selection Results
against P. acnes and P. aeruginosa
affinity selection step
P. acnes DMST 14916
P. aeruginosa DMST 37186
rounds of selection
1
3
colonies obtained
844 colonies
2.2 × 104 colonies
colonies picked up
576 colonies
96 colonies
positive clones at monoclonal
phage ELISA
3 clones
61 clones
positive clones at scFv ELISA expressed in HB2151 E. coli
1 out of 2
clones tested
4 out of 15 clones tested
clones sent for DNA sequencing
3 clones
4 clones
DNA sequencing result
3 different scFv sequences
all 4 clones have
same scFv sequence
scFv clone identity
yPac1A8, yPac1E4, yPac1E7
yPgi3G4
For P. aeruginosa (DMST 37186),
3 rounds of affinity selection were carried out and 96 colonies were
randomly picked for monoclonal phage ELISA. Sixty-one virion clones
showed two-fold higher OD values against P. aeruginosa than the negative control (1% BSA). After binding confirmation,
15 clones were selected to generate soluble scFv from the non-suppressor
strain of E. coli (HB2151). Out of
15, 4 clones that showed a high signal by scFv ELISA (data not shown)
were sent for DNA sequencing, and the result revealed that all clones
possessed the same scFv sequence. This clone, designated yPgi3G4,
was further expressed in the pET-21d (+) system.The affinity
selection data confirms the previous observation that
a compact non-immunized phage display humanscFv library, generated
from blood of healthy individuals in the rural regions of Thailand,[4] can be used as a good resource for the generation
of specific antibodies against a wide variety of external antigens,
including both the Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogenic bacteria
used in this study. It is worth noting that the immobilization of
the desired targets is one of the important steps in the affinity
selection process of phage display technology. In this report, we
have optimized various parameters of the affinity selection procedure.[30] In particular, we have prepared bacterial targets
in several ways. These include whole, boiled and sonicated bacterial
cells. The effective method which yields positive clones came from
using boiled bacterial antigens as described in the materials and
methods section.
DNA and Amino Acid Sequence Analysis of Selected
Virion Clones
A diagram of recombinant scFv in this study
is depicted in Figure A. The variable region
of the heavy chain (VH) at the N-terminus is connected
to the variable region of the light chain (VL) by a GGGGSGGGGSGGGGS
peptide linker sequence. The C-terminus of scFv is linked with a hexa-histidine
tag (6 x His tag) followed by a Myc tag. The gene of scFv and the
gene III protein sequence of the bacteriophage are intervened by an
Amber stop codon (TAG), which is recognized by the non-suppressor
strain of E. coli, HB2151, as a stop
signal.[4] DNA and amino acid sequences of
isolated clones in comparison with those of human germline antibody
variable region gene sequences are presented in Table . Out of the seven existing IGHV (human immunoglobulin
heavy variable) gene subgroups, isolated scFv clones from this study
belong to subgroups 3 and 6. Clones active against P. acnes (yPac1A8, yPac1E4, yPac1E7) are from IGHV
subgroup 6 and are derived from the same germline gene and allele
IGHV6-1*01 with >91% sequence identity. Their sequences differ
from
that in the germline by 13–17 amino acids. Three clones share
one CDR3 amino acid sequence pattern (“-RG-S-FDM”).
The clone active against P. aeruginosa (yPgi3G4) is from the IGHV subgroup 3 and derived from germline
gene and allele IGHV3-7*01 with >90% sequence identity. Its sequence
is different from that in the germline by 15 amino acids.
Figure 1
Structural
analysis of 6xHis-tagged scFv. (A) Schematic arrangement
of scFv primary structure from the N-terminus (5′) to C-terminus
(3′): CDR regions of VH domain, VH-VL linker (blue), CDR regions of VL domain, 6xHis
tag (red), Myc tag (green), and Amber stop codon (black). 3D modeling
structures based on scFv (PDB ID code 1f3r.1.B) are shown in (B)–(E). Surface
view of yPac1A8 scFv (B) and yPgi3G4 scFv (C), with the same color
coding as in diagram (A). A ribbon model showing the α-helix
and β-sheet of yPac1A8 scFv (D) and yPgi3G4 scFv (E): N-terminus
(orange), VH domain (gray), disulfide bridge (yellow),
linker (blue), VL domain (violet), and C-terminus (red).
Only yPac1A8 possesses intra-domain disulfide bridge (shown in inset)
between Cysteine 24 and Cysteine 102 residues of the VH domain.
Table 2
Analysis of DNA and
Amino Acid Sequences
of Isolated scFv Fragments against Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative
Bacteriaa
Structural
analysis of 6xHis-tagged scFv. (A) Schematic arrangement
of scFv primary structure from the N-terminus (5′) to C-terminus
(3′): CDR regions of VH domain, VH-VL linker (blue), CDR regions of VL domain, 6xHis
tag (red), Myc tag (green), and Amber stop codon (black). 3D modeling
structures based on scFv (PDB ID code 1f3r.1.B) are shown in (B)–(E). Surface
view of yPac1A8 scFv (B) and yPgi3G4 scFv (C), with the same color
coding as in diagram (A). A ribbon model showing the α-helix
and β-sheet of yPac1A8 scFv (D) and yPgi3G4 scFv (E): N-terminus
(orange), VH domain (gray), disulfide bridge (yellow),
linker (blue), VL domain (violet), and C-terminus (red).
Only yPac1A8 possesses intra-domain disulfide bridge (shown in inset)
between Cysteine 24 and Cysteine 102 residues of the VH domain.Homsap, Homosapien; IGHV, immunoglobulin
heavy variable; IGLV, immunoglobulin lambda variable; V-domain, variable
domain.All isolated scFv
clones, either active against P. acnes or P. aeruginosa, are members of
IGLV (human immunoglobulin λ) gene subgroup
2 out of the existing 11 (IGLV1 to 11). The immunoglobulin light chain
κ to λ ratio has been estimated to be 1.5–2, and
the chance of isolating κ light chain antibodies is higher than
that of the λ.[31] However, in our
study, all four scFv clones have λ. Two of them (yPac1A8, yPac1E7)
are derived from the germline gene and allele IGLV2-18*02 with >93%
sequence identity, with 9–12 amino acids difference. Another
clone (yPac1E4) originates from the germline gene and allele IGLV2-14*01
with nearly 99% sequence identity and has only one amino acid difference.
The last clone (yPgi3G4) is a derivative of the germline gene and
allele IGLV2-8*01 with >97% sequence identity and has eight amino
acids difference. The amino acid sequence of the light chain CDR3
region of all isolated clones starts with “SS” and ends
with “V”. Sequence analysis of the two scFv genes showed
a high number of amino acid differences from germline genes, indicating
that the genes were isolated from plasma B cells in the blood after
affinity maturation.The predicted three-dimensional structure
of the two scFv clones
that were selected for further study, i.e., anti-P.
acnes clone (yPac1A8) and anti-P. aeruginosa clone (yPgi3G4), are illustrated in Figure B–E. Anti-P. acnes (yPac1A8) scFv was a 29.4 kDa protein of 279 amino acids, while
anti-P. aeruginosa (yPgi3G4) scFv was
a 28.7 kDa protein of 274 amino acids. The surface view of important
structures of yPac1A8 and yPgi3G4 is illustrated in Figure B and C, respectively. In addition,
the α-helix and β-sheet of both clones are shown in Figure D and E. The intra-domain
disulfide bond of yPac1A8 VH region was zoomed in and is
shown in Figure D.
Cloning and Expression of scFv Antibody Fragments
To
further characterize the two identified recombinant scFvs against
model Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, DNA sequences of yPac1A8
and yPgi3G4 scFvs were sub-cloned into pET-21d (+), expressed in SHuffle
T7 B strain E. coli, and purified by
one-step Ni2+-NTAagarose affinity chromatography. Optimization
of expression and purification processes was carried out, and SDS-PAGE
of the purification process of both scFvs, before and after optimization,
is demonstrated in Figure A–D. The majority of unwanted protein fractions could
be removed after optimization. Elution fractions contained protein
bands of scFv at the expected molecular weight of approx. 29 kDa.
About 3.0 mg of purified yPac1A8 scFv and 2.3 mg of purified yPgi3G4
scFv are routinely obtained from a 1 L Terrific broth by the baffled
flask culture system. A discrepancy between the purity of the two
scFv clones was observed under the same scFvexpression and purification
protocols (Figure A–E), of which clone yPac1A8, which has a higher scFv yield,
appeared purer than clone yPgi3G4.
Figure 2
Expression and purification of 6xHis-tagged
scFv. SDS-PAGE of 6xHis-tagged
scFv samples before and after optimization of expression and purification
steps. All gels were Coomassie Brilliant Blue-stained. (A) yPac1A8
scFv before optimization. (B) yPac1A8 scFv after optimization. (C)
yPgi3G4 scFv before optimization and (D) yPgi3G4 scFv after optimization.
Precision Plus All Blue Prestained Protein Standards (BioRad #1610373,
U.S.A.) were used as a molecular weight marker in (A) and (C). Prestained
Protein Standards (Enzmart #APC-001, Thailand) were used as a molecular
weight marker for (B) and (D). (E) Purified yPac1A8 and yPgi3G4 scFv
were resolved by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with anti-histidine antibody-gold
nanoparticle conjugate. Solid arrow indicates scFv bands at a correct
size (about 29 kDa).
Expression and purification of 6xHis-tagged
scFv. SDS-PAGE of 6xHis-tagged
scFv samples before and after optimization of expression and purification
steps. All gels were Coomassie Brilliant Blue-stained. (A) yPac1A8
scFv before optimization. (B) yPac1A8 scFv after optimization. (C)
yPgi3G4 scFv before optimization and (D) yPgi3G4 scFv after optimization.
Precision Plus All Blue Prestained Protein Standards (BioRad #1610373,
U.S.A.) were used as a molecular weight marker in (A) and (C). Prestained
Protein Standards (Enzmart #APC-001, Thailand) were used as a molecular
weight marker for (B) and (D). (E) Purified yPac1A8 and yPgi3G4 scFv
were resolved by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with anti-histidine antibody-gold
nanoparticle conjugate. Solid arrow indicates scFv bands at a correct
size (about 29 kDa).The two scFv clones were
also observed by western blotting (WB)
as shown in Figure E. About 1 μg of each scFv could be detected by an anti-histidine
antibody gold nanoparticle conjugate, indicating that hexa-histidine
tag of both scFv fragments could interact with the anti-6xhistidine
detection system. Both yPac1A8 and yPgi3G4 scFvs could be observed
as bright red bands at the expected size. Although equal amounts of
scFv were loaded as estimated by the Bradford standard microtiter
plate assay, the yPgi3G4 WB band appeared slightly thinner than that
of yPac1A8.
Specific Binding of scFv Antibody by Whole
Cell ELISA
To evaluate the binding specificity of the two
anti-bacterial scFv
antibodies, an ELISA against whole cell bacteria was performed. The
binding of yPac1A8 and yPgi3G4 scFv was tested against a panel of
Gram-positive bacteria (Propionibacterium acidipropionici, Propionibacterium freudenreichii, P. acnes) and Gram-negative bacteria
(Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas fluorescens, P. aeruginosa). Heat-inactivated whole cell bacteria (109 cells/mL)
were immobilized and incubated with 10 μg/mL of the two scFv
clones. Specific binding of yPac1A8 scFv to P. acnes and yPgi3G4 scFv to P. aeruginosa, respectively, at the species level could be obtained as demonstrated
in Figure A and Figure S1. Anti-P. acnes scFv (yPac1A8) did not bind to five P. acnes strains tested, other than the target that was used for affinity
selection. Anti-P. aeruginosa scFv
(yPgi3G4) could bind to three out of four P. aeruginosa strains tested, in addition to its affinity selection target.
Figure 3
Cross-reactivity
analysis of 6xHis-tagged scFv by whole-cell ELISA
and WB. Binding activities of yPac1A8 and yPgi3G4 scFvs were determined
by whole-cell ELISA on a plate coated with the indicated bacteria
(A): P. acidipropionici TISTR 442, P. freudenreichii TISTR 446, P. acnes DMST 14916, P. acnes strains DSM
1897, DSM 16379, DSM 30738, DSM 30753, DSM 30919, P.
putida TISTR 1522, P. fluorescens TISTR 358, P. aeruginosa DMST 37186, P. aeruginosa strains TISTR 357, TISTR 781, TISTR
1101, TISTR 1287, and wells without immobilized bacteria. The bars
represent the average OD values of triplicate samples, and error bars
represent the standard error of the mean. A picture of the ELISA plate
is shown in the Supporting Information (Figure S1). (B) SDS-PAGE and WB of boiled antigen preparation of P. acnes strains, immunoblotted with yPac1A8 scFv:
DMST 14916, DSM 1897, DSM 16379, DSM 30738, DSM 30753, and DSM 30919:
Coomassie Brilliant Blue-stained SDS-PAGE gel. The P. acnes antigen is located between 20 and 25 kDa
(arrow pointed) and was detected by yPac1A8 scFv. (C) SDS-PAGE and
WB of boiled antigen preparation of P. aeruginosa strains, immunoblotted with yPgi3G4 scFv as indicated: DMST 37186,
TISTR 357, TISTR 781, TISTR 1101, and TISTR 1287. The P. aeruginosa antigen located between 37 and 50 kDa
(arrow pointed) was detected by yPgi3G4 scFv. Precision Plus All Blue
Prestained Protein Standards (BioRad#1610373, U.S.A.) were used as
a molecular weight marker.
Cross-reactivity
analysis of 6xHis-tagged scFv by whole-cell ELISA
and WB. Binding activities of yPac1A8 and yPgi3G4 scFvs were determined
by whole-cell ELISA on a plate coated with the indicated bacteria
(A): P. acidipropionici TISTR 442, P. freudenreichii TISTR 446, P. acnesDMST 14916, P. acnes strains DSM
1897, DSM 16379, DSM 30738, DSM 30753, DSM 30919, P.
putida TISTR 1522, P. fluorescens TISTR 358, P. aeruginosa DMST 37186, P. aeruginosa strains TISTR 357, TISTR 781, TISTR
1101, TISTR 1287, and wells without immobilized bacteria. The bars
represent the average OD values of triplicate samples, and error bars
represent the standard error of the mean. A picture of the ELISA plate
is shown in the Supporting Information (Figure S1). (B) SDS-PAGE and WB of boiled antigen preparation of P. acnes strains, immunoblotted with yPac1A8 scFv:
DMST 14916, DSM 1897, DSM 16379, DSM 30738, DSM 30753, and DSM 30919:
Coomassie Brilliant Blue-stained SDS-PAGE gel. The P. acnes antigen is located between 20 and 25 kDa
(arrow pointed) and was detected by yPac1A8 scFv. (C) SDS-PAGE and
WB of boiled antigen preparation of P. aeruginosa strains, immunoblotted with yPgi3G4 scFv as indicated: DMST 37186,
TISTR 357, TISTR 781, TISTR 1101, and TISTR 1287. The P. aeruginosa antigen located between 37 and 50 kDa
(arrow pointed) was detected by yPgi3G4 scFv. Precision Plus All Blue
Prestained Protein Standards (BioRad#1610373, U.S.A.) were used as
a molecular weight marker.In this study, successful uses of scFv as a nanostructure for the
specific detection of bacterial targets in various formats have been
demonstrated. The key to the success could be because (1) the phage
display library was generated from plasma B cells of healthy individuals
who might have been exposed to the bacteria and (2) the choice of
affinity selection method used in this study. Boiled pathogenic bacterial
antigens were used as a target for affinity selection. This is the
same type of antigen preparation that is used to immunize animals
for generating antibodies via the traditional method. The fact that
the target antigen could resist heat denaturation and that the western
blot bands were heterogeneous suggested that the epitopes are post-translationally
modified, probably by glycosylation or the addition of a short linear
epitope on the surface of the protein, but not a discontinuous epitope,
which is a segment on the 3D structure of the protein that will not
resist heat. Identification of the epitopes of these two scFv antibodies
is beyond the scope of this study and will be explored in the next
step.
Detection of Bacterial Targets by WB
In addition to
ELISA, the target antigens of the two scFv clones were also detected
by WB. As shown in Figure B, yPac1A8 scFv could detect its target antigen, located between
20 and 25 kDa regions, from denatured P. acnesDMST 14916 preparation, but not from other P. acnes strains tested. Similarly, as shown in Figure C, yPgi3G4 scFv could detect its target antigen,
located between 37 and 50 kDa regions, out of the boiled P. aeruginosa DMST 37186 preparation. Moreover, yPgi3G4
scFv could detect its target from three other P. aeruginosa strains tested (TISTR 357, TISTR 1101, TISTR 1287), but not from
TISTR 781. These results are similar to the patterns obtained from
ELISA assay. Identification of these bacterial target antigens is
beyond the scope of this study and will be carried out in the future.It has been shown that the level of expression and folding of different
scFv fragments varied, depending on the amino acid sequence and intracellular
disulfide bond formation.[32] In this report,
while there was one intra-domain disulfide in clone yPac1A8 scFv,
there was no detectable disulfide bond formation in yPgi3G4; consequently,
we observed that the clone yPgi3G4 was less stable and this could
be because the folding was disulfide-independent.[33] Even though both scFv antibodies could be expressed at
a relatively good yield from E. coli SHuffle strain, which favors disulfide bond formation inside the
cytoplasm,[34,35] it is possible to improve the
stability and hence the binding affinity, by introducing inter-domain
disulfide bonds.[36,37]
Checkerboard Titration
(CBT) ELISA
In order to determine
the optimal concentration of target bacteria and corresponding scFv
antibody to be used in the ELISA, a checkerboard titration was performed.[38] This method could be used to estimate the binding
affinity of the two recombinant antibodies to their target bacteria,[39] and the results are shown in Figure A and C and Figures S2 and S3. For yPac1A8, the highest scFv concentration
tested (10 μg/mL) could detect 1.6 × 105 cells/mL
and the lowest scFv concentration tested (0.1 μg/mL) could detect
1.6 × 109 cells/mL. For yPgi3G4, as much as 40 μg/mL
scFv could detect 2.7 × 107 cells/mL. These results
indicated that the binding affinity of scFv clone yPac1A8 to its target
(P. acnes) is higher than that of the
clone yPgi3G4 against its target (P. aeruginosa). While the apparent binding characteristics of the two isolated
antibodies seems sufficient for various assay formats, further improvement
of binding affinity or specificity could be performed by different
affinity maturation techniques as previously described.[40,41]
Figure 4
Checkerboard
titration and flow cytometry analysis against whole
cell bacteria. The limit of detection of yPac1A8 for P. acnes DMST 14916 (A) and yPgi3G4 for P. aeruginosa DMST 37186 (C) was determined by checkerboard
titration of whole-cell ELISA, using a dilution series of scFv and
serial dilutions of bacteria as indicated. The lines represent the
average absorbance values of duplicate samples, and error bars represent
the standard error of the mean. Pictures of ELISA plates are shown
in the Supporting Information (Figures S2 and S3). Flow cytometry analysis of yPac1A8 (B) and yPgi3G4 scFv
(D) binding to live P. acnes DMST 14916
and P. aeruginosa DMST 37186, respectively.
Reactivity of 6xHis-tagged scFv is indicated by the red line. The
secondary antibody alone (control) is indicated by the black line.
Checkerboard
titration and flow cytometry analysis against whole
cell bacteria. The limit of detection of yPac1A8 for P. acnesDMST 14916 (A) and yPgi3G4 for P. aeruginosa DMST 37186 (C) was determined by checkerboard
titration of whole-cell ELISA, using a dilution series of scFv and
serial dilutions of bacteria as indicated. The lines represent the
average absorbance values of duplicate samples, and error bars represent
the standard error of the mean. Pictures of ELISA plates are shown
in the Supporting Information (Figures S2 and S3). Flow cytometry analysis of yPac1A8 (B) and yPgi3G4 scFv
(D) binding to live P. acnesDMST 14916
and P. aeruginosa DMST 37186, respectively.
Reactivity of 6xHis-tagged scFv is indicated by the red line. The
secondary antibody alone (control) is indicated by the black line.
Detection of Live Bacteria by Flow Cytometry
To demonstrate
the binding of yPac1A8 and yPgi3G4 to living target bacteria, flow
cytometry analysis was performed. P. acnes and P. aeruginosa cells were exposed
to their corresponding specific scFv followed by anti-polyhistidine
Dylight 488 secondary antibody. Cells stained only with anti-polyhistidine
Dylight 488 monoclonal antibody were used as a negative control. From
each sample, 10,000 events were collected and around 90% of them were
bacteria, which were gated in hierarchy for their Dylight 488 fluorescence
signal. About 96.9% and 83.3% of P. acnes and P. aeruginosa were stained with
their corresponding antibodies. Data analysis was performed using
the built-in Attune Cytometric Software. The results were presented
in a histogram overlay format in Figure B and D.
Immunofluorescent Staining
of Whole Bacterial Cells and Biofilms
In addition to ELISA,
WB, and flow cytometry, the binding of scFv
antibodies was also revealed by a confocal laser scanning microscopy
(CLSM) technique as illustrated in Figures –7. For the species-specific binding of yPac1A8 to P. acnes, P. acidipropionici, P. freudenreichii, and P. aeruginosa were used as controls (Figure ). In the bright field row,
bacterial cells were seen dispersed throughout the field. In the DAPI
row, the nucleoid regions of bacteria were stained blue. In the Dylight
488 row, only P. acnes cells were bound
by yPac1A8 hexa-histidine-tagged scFv, which was detected by a Dylight
488-labeled secondary detection agent and the cells appeared green.
Some P. acnes cells showed a green
cell outline along an unstained center suggesting the cell surface
localization of the yPac1A8 scFv-ligand. Similar species-specific
binding could be observed between the binding of 6xHis-tagged yPgi3G4
against its target bacteria, P. aeruginosa cells (Figure ). P. putida, P. fluorescens, and P. acnes were used as bacterial
controls. These results corresponded well with the ELISA as described
in the previous section.
Figure 5
CLSM of yPac1A8 and planktonic bacteria. P. acnes DMST 14916, P. acidipropionici TISTR
442, P. freudenreichii TISTR 446, and P. aeruginosa DMST 37186 were incubated with yPac1A8
scFv, detected by Dylight 488-labeled anti-hexa-histidine mouse monoclonal
antibody, and counterstained with DAPI. Photos were taken by an Apo
TIRF 60x Oil DIC N2 objective of Nikon A1R confocal laser microscope.
Scale bars represent 10 μm. In bright field panel (A), individual
bacterial cells were seen. In DAPI panel (B), nucleoids of bacteria
were stained blue. In Dylight 488 panel (C), only P.
acnes DMST 14916 was stained green. In merged panel
(D), the blue nucleoids and the green cell surfaces of P. acnes overlapped. In the case of P. acidipropionici, P. freudenreichii, and P. aeruginosa, only the blue
nucleoids were stained.
Figure 7
CLSM of
biofilms stained by indicated scFv. Biofilms of P.
acnes DMST 14916, P. acidipropionici TISTR 442, P. putida TISTR 1522,
and P. aeruginosa DMST 37186 were stained
by yPac1A8 and yPgi3G4 scFvs as indicated. Scale bars represent 10
μm. In bright field panel (A), bacterial cell clusters were
seen. In DAPI panel (B), nucleoids of bacteria were stained blue.
In Dylight 488 panel (C), P. acnes were
stained green by yPac1A8 scFv but not P. acidipropionici. Likewise, P. aeruginosa were stained
green by yPgi3G4 scFv but not P. putida. In merged panel (D), the blue nucleoids and the green cell surfaces
of P. acnes and P. aeruginosa overlapped. In the case of P. acidipropionici and P. putida, only the blue nucleoids
were stained.
Figure 6
CLSM of yPgi3G4 and planktonic
bacteria. Photos of P. aeruginosa DMST
37186, P. putida TISTR 1522, P. fluorescens TISTR
358, and P. acnes DMST 14916 were taken
at the same specifications as in Figure . Scale bars represent 10 μm. In bright
field panel (A), bacterial cells are seen. In DAPI panel (B), nucleoids
of bacteria are blue. In Dylight 488 panel (C), only P. aeruginosa are green. In merged panel (D), the
blue nucleoids and the green cell surfaces of P. aeruginosa overlapped. In the case of P. putida, P. fluorescens and P. acnes, only the blue nucleoids were stained.
CLSM of yPac1A8 and planktonic bacteria. P. acnesDMST 14916, P. acidipropionici TISTR
442, P. freudenreichii TISTR 446, and P. aeruginosa DMST 37186 were incubated with yPac1A8
scFv, detected by Dylight 488-labeled anti-hexa-histidine mouse monoclonal
antibody, and counterstained with DAPI. Photos were taken by an Apo
TIRF 60x Oil DIC N2 objective of Nikon A1R confocal laser microscope.
Scale bars represent 10 μm. In bright field panel (A), individual
bacterial cells were seen. In DAPI panel (B), nucleoids of bacteria
were stained blue. In Dylight 488 panel (C), only P.
acnes DMST 14916 was stained green. In merged panel
(D), the blue nucleoids and the green cell surfaces of P. acnes overlapped. In the case of P. acidipropionici, P. freudenreichii, and P. aeruginosa, only the blue
nucleoids were stained.CLSM of yPgi3G4 and planktonic
bacteria. Photos of P. aeruginosa DMST
37186, P. putida TISTR 1522, P. fluorescens TISTR
358, and P. acnesDMST 14916 were taken
at the same specifications as in Figure . Scale bars represent 10 μm. In bright
field panel (A), bacterial cells are seen. In DAPI panel (B), nucleoids
of bacteria are blue. In Dylight 488 panel (C), only P. aeruginosa are green. In merged panel (D), the
blue nucleoids and the green cell surfaces of P. aeruginosa overlapped. In the case of P. putida, P. fluorescens and P. acnes, only the blue nucleoids were stained.CLSM of
biofilms stained by indicated scFv. Biofilms of P.
acnes DMST 14916, P. acidipropionici TISTR 442, P. putida TISTR 1522,
and P. aeruginosa DMST 37186 were stained
by yPac1A8 and yPgi3G4 scFvs as indicated. Scale bars represent 10
μm. In bright field panel (A), bacterial cell clusters were
seen. In DAPI panel (B), nucleoids of bacteria were stained blue.
In Dylight 488 panel (C), P. acnes were
stained green by yPac1A8 scFv but not P. acidipropionici. Likewise, P. aeruginosa were stained
green by yPgi3G4 scFv but not P. putida. In merged panel (D), the blue nucleoids and the green cell surfaces
of P. acnes and P. aeruginosa overlapped. In the case of P. acidipropionici and P. putida, only the blue nucleoids
were stained.Since bacterial biofilms may play
a role in pathogenesis and chronic
infection,[42] the binding of selected scFvs
against target bacteria in biofilms was also investigated. As demonstrated
in Figure , P. acnes and P. aeruginosa biofilms cultured on glass coverslips were stained by yPac1A8 and
yPgi3G4, respectively. Biofilms of P. acidipropionici TISTR 442 and P. putida TISTR 1522
were used as controls. In the bright field row, bacterial cell clusters
were seen. In the DAPI row, the nucleoid regions of bacteria were
stained blue. In the Dylight 488 row, P. acnes and P. aeruginosa cells were observed
as green bacilli with an obvious unstained central halo region. The
results indicated that both scFvs could bind to their target bacteria
inside a biofilm.
Cell Surface Staining by Electron Microscopy
Electron
microscopy was carried out to further investigate the findings obtained
by whole cell ELISA, flow cytometry, and CLSM, which suggested that
the target antigens are located on the bacterial cell surface. Ni-NTA
sensitized 10 nm nanogold particles were used as a detection probe.
As expected, nanogold particles were seen as dark dots along the cell
outline of P. acnes and P. aeruginosa under a transmission electron microscope
(Figure ). These results
confirmed the cell surface localization of the two anti-bacterial
scFv ligands.
Figure 8
TEM of P. acnes and P. aeruginosa. Four P. acnes DMST 14916 cells (A) and six P. aeruginosa DMST 37186 cells (B) were treated with yPac1A8 and yPgi3G4 scFvs,
respectively. Photos were taken by the Hitachi Hi-Tech HT7700 transmission
electron microscope at x25.0 k magnification with Zoom-1 lens mode
at the accelerating voltage of 80.0 kV. Scale bars represent 1.0 μm.
The large round structures are bacterial cells, and small dense black
dots are 10 nm Ni-NTA nanogold particles.
TEM of P. acnes and P. aeruginosa. Four P. acnesDMST 14916 cells (A) and six P. aeruginosa DMST 37186 cells (B) were treated with yPac1A8 and yPgi3G4 scFvs,
respectively. Photos were taken by the Hitachi Hi-Tech HT7700 transmission
electron microscope at x25.0 k magnification with Zoom-1 lens mode
at the accelerating voltage of 80.0 kV. Scale bars represent 1.0 μm.
The large round structures are bacterial cells, and small dense black
dots are 10 nm Ni-NTA nanogold particles.The application of anti-bacterial scFvs as nanostructures is demonstrated
in different binding assays. In these assays, the 6xHis tag at the
C-terminus of the scFv was bound with anti-His antibody or nickel,
conjugated with enzyme horseradish peroxidase (HRP), gold nanoparticle,
or fluorescent dye. The data from this study indicated that the arrangement
of domains comprising VH-(G4S)3-VL-6xHis-Myc, as depicted in Figure A, is an effective nanostructure. The predicted 3D
structure of both scFv antibodies indicated that the CDR regions of
yPac1A8 and yPgi3G4 scFv are located opposite to the 6xHis tag. This
conformation seems to be favorable for specific antigen binding activity
and for the poly-His tag recognition function to take place without
structural constraint.The advantage of directional conjugation
via the 6xHis-tag over
random conjugation is that there is no interference with the antigen
binding site. Histidine is strongly involved in the coordinate bond
with metal ions and the polyhistidine tag has been used as one of
the most popular tags for protein purification by metal chelate affinity
chromatography. The Ni2+ ion of Ni-NTA binds with two histidine
residues of the 6xHis tag.[43] A stable attachment
between one scFv and one gold particle is established when three adjacent
Ni-NTA groups of the gold nanoparticle bind to the 6x-His tag of scFv.
As for metal ions, copper has the highest affinity, and the affinity
decreases in the order of nickel, zinc, and cobalt.[44] While nickel is often used for general purposes, the binding
affinity between scFv and a detector or carrier can be increased by
changing the type of metal ion or by introducing a type of tag, such
as using streptavidin-biotin interactions, which are considered the
strongest non-covalent natural bond.[45]
Conclusions and Future Perspectives
An efficient method
for the identification of scFv nanostructures
for the specific detection of two model Gram-positive and Gram-negative
bacteria, P. acnes and P. aeruginosa, by the affinity selection of a non-immunized
human phage scFv antibody library against boiled bacterial antigens
is reported. The specific binding of 6xHis-tagged scFv fragments to
a bacterial cell surface was demonstrated by ELISA, WB, flow cytometry,
and confocal fluorescence and electron microscopy. These scFv antibody
fragments could be further developed to be used as a point-of-care
diagnostic or further engineered and used as novel therapeutic agents
in many ways such as conversion into whole immunoglobulin (IgG) molecule
for monoclonal antibody therapy, conjugation to nanoparticles loaded
with antibiotics, or conjugation with nanoparticles for multiplex
biosensor-based detection, which could be very useful for biofilm
detection. In addition, genetic engineering can be used to improve
the binding affinity or specificity, create bi-specific antibody to
enhance the binding spectrum or creating sensitive detection probe
by fusing with fluorescent proteins or enzymes such as alkaline phosphatase,
horseradish peroxidase, or luciferase. These are examples of interesting
research in the next step to be explored.
Materials and Methods
Bacterial
Strains
Affinity selection targets: P. acnesDMST 14916 and P. aeruginosa DMST
37186, were kindly provided by Dr. Griangsak Eumkeb, School
of Sciences, Suranaree University of Technology, Thailand. The species
identity of both strains was confirmed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing
at Macrogen, Inc., South Korea. P. acnes strains DSM 1897, DSM 16379, DSM 30738, DSM 30753, and DSM 30919
were kindly provided by Professor Dietmar Haltrich, Department of
Food Science and Technology, University of Natural Resources and Life
Sciences, Vienna. P. freudenreichii TISTR 446, P. fluorescens TISTR 358, P. putida TISTR 1522, and P. aeruginosa strains TISTR 357, TISTR 781, and TISTR 1287 were purchased from
the Thailand Institute of Scientific and Technological Research. P. acidipropionici TISTR 442 and P.
aeruginosa TISTR 1101 were kindly provided by TISTR
for academic research purposes. TG1 strain E. coli and HB2151 strain E. coli were obtained
from the Medical Research Council (MRC) Laboratory, Cambridge, UK.
SHuffle T7 B strain E. coli (NEB #C3029J,
U.S.A.) was purchased from New England Biolabs, U.S.A. The source
of materials used is described elsewhere.
Affinity Selection (Biopanning)
against P. acnes and P. aeruginosa
Antigen Preparation
P. aeruginosa colonies were grown
on LB broth and incubated overnight at 250 rpm,
37 °C. P. acnes colonies were
cultured in BHI broth and incubated for 5 days at 37 °C anaerobically
in a GasPak system. Bacterial cells were washed with PBS two times
and resuspended in PBS at the OD600 of 2.0. Cell suspensions
were boiled for 1 h in a water bath, and the protein concentration
was determined by Bradford standard microtiter plate assay (BioRad
#500-0006, California, U.S.A.).
Affinity Selection Procedure
Affinity selection was
carried out according to a previously published protocol.[30] Maxisorp immunotube (Nalgene Nunc International,
Denmark) was coated overnight at 4 °C with 25 μg of boiled
bacterial antigen in 100 mM NaHCO3 (pH 8.5). The tube was
blocked with 2% (w/v) skimmed milk protein in phosphate-buffered saline
(PBSM) before incubation with 1012 plaque-forming units
(pfu) of virion from the Yamo I human phage display scFv library[4] in 2% PBSM. The tube was washed five times with
0.05% (v/v) Tween-20 in PBS (PBST) followed by five more PBS washes.
Then, the bound virions were eluted with 1 mg/mL trypsin in PBS followed
by 100 mM glycine-HCl (pH 2.0), and neutralization was carried out
with 200 mM NaPO4 (pH 7.5). For the second and third round,
eluted virions were pooled together, amplified, and purified by PEG
precipitation, as previously described.[46]
Amplification of the Individual Virion Clone
Discrete
colonies of E. coli TG1, infected with
eluted virions from affinity selection, were randomly picked and cultured
in U-shaped 96-well microplates (Nunclon delta surface, Thermo Fisher
Scientific #163320, U.S.A.), containing 100 μL/well of 2×YT
medium with 100 μg/mL ampicillin and 1.0% (w/v) glucose (2xYT-AmpGlu).
The cultures were super-infected with helper phage KM13 to amplify
the isolated virion as previously explained.[47] After incubation at 30 °C with shaking at 250 rpm for 20 h,
supernatants containing the virions obtained after the centrifugation
of a deep-well plate were used for monoclonal phage ELISA as described
in the ELISA section.
DNA and Amino Acid Sequence Analysis of Selected
Virion Clones
Phagemids from selected ELISA-positive virion
clones were prepared
and sent for automated DNA sequence analysis as previously described.[47] Contig alignment of the sequences was performed
using Vector NTI software (Thermo Fisher Scientific, U.S.A.), and
the aligned sequences were further analyzed with the IgBLAST tool
from the National Center for Biotechnology Information[48] and IMGT/V-QUEST tool from the international
ImMunoGeneTics information system.[49] Three-dimensional
structures of selected scFvs were generated by using the SWISS-MODEL
server from the Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics.[50] The template (PDB ID code: 1f3r.1.B) was chosen by sequence identity
analysis. Models were built by target-template alignment using ProMod3
and visualized with the program PyMOL, a molecular visualization system
from Schrödinger, LLC, U.S.A.[51]
Small-Scale Production of Soluble scFv from E.
coli HB2151
Soluble scFv clones were produced
from the non-suppressor strain of E. coliHB2151, which read the Amber codon between the scFv and geneIII
protein gene sequences in the phagemid vector as a stop codon instead
of glutamic acid in the TG1 strain, as previously described.[41] The culture supernatant containing soluble scFv
fragments was used for scFv ELISA as described in the ELISA section.
Production of Hexa-Histidine-Tagged scFv (6xHis-Tagged scFv)
Cloning
and Expression of scFv Genes
The scFv genes
against P. acnes and P. aeruginosa were cloned into pET-21d (+) expression
vectors and designated as pET21d+/yPac1A8 and pET21d+/yPgi3G4, respectively,
as previously described.[47] The scFv genes
were expressed in the cytoplasm of protease deficient E. coli, SHuffle T7 B strain (NEB #C3029J, U.S.A.),
according to a previous study[52] with some
optimization. Briefly, a colony streaked from −80 °C stock
of SHuffle E. coli C3029 harboring
pET21d+/yPac1A8 or pET21d+/yPgi3G4 was inoculated into 5 mL of Terrific
Broth (TB: Tryptone 12 g/L, yeast extract 24 g/L, glycerol 4 mL/L,
0.17 M KH2PO4, and 0.72 M K2HPO4) containing 100 μg/mL ampicillin and incubated overnight
at 30 °C with 225 rpm shaking. On the next day, a starter culture
was transferred into 500 mL of fresh TB containing 100 μg/mL
ampicillin and cultured at 30 °C in a bench-top bioreactor system
or in a baffled flask with 225 rpm shaking until the OD600 reached about 1.0. Protein expression was induced with 0.85 mM IPTG
for 24 h at 25 °C. The culture was cooled on ice for 5 min and
centrifuged at 3000g for 30 min at 4 °C. The
cell pellet was used directly for scFv purification or otherwise stored
at −40 °C.
Purification of Hexa-Histidine-Tagged scFv
The 6xHis-tagged
scFv was purified by immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC),
using a gravity flow column containing a Ni-NTA (Ni2+ nitrilotriacetic
acid) agarose affinity chromatography matrix, following the company’s
manual (Qiagen #30230, Germany). The resin was washed with washing
buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 0.5 M NaCl, 100 mM imidazole, pH 7.5), and
scFv was eluted with elution buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 0.5 M NaCl, 500
mM imidazole, pH 7.5). Desalting and buffer exchange was performed
by dialysis overnight in SnakeSkin Dialysis Tubing with 10 kDa MWCO
(Thermo Fisher Scientific #68100, U.S.A.) against cold PBS buffer
at 4 °C. The purity of eluted scFvs was checked by SDS-PAGE,
and the purified soluble scFv concentration was determined by a Bradford
standard microtiter plate assay (BioRad #500-0006, California, U.S.A.).
The samples were kept at −80 °C in 250 mg/mL BSA or at
−40 °C in 20% glycerol.
Western Blot Analysis
WB of
Isolated scFv
Equal amounts (1 μg) of purified
scFv (yPac1A8 and yPgi3G4) were heat-treated at 90 °C for 10
min in SDS sample buffer containing β-mercaptoethanol. Then,
samples were electrophoresed in 12.5% SDS-PAGE gel for 5 min at 50
V followed by 90 min at 100 V and were transferred to a polyvinylidene
difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Cytiva #10600021, U.S.A.) by wet-blotting
using a Mini Trans-Blot electrophoretic transfer cell (Biorad #1703930,
U.S.A.) at 30 V for 15 h at 4 °C. To detect the scFv, the membrane
was incubated with 10 mL of anti-histidine antibody-gold nanoparticle
conjugate (Jena Bioscience# PS-110, Germany) for 3 h at room temperature
with slight rocking. The scFv bands became visible due to antibody
mediated gold nanoparticle accumulation.
WB of Bacterial Targets
Using Identified 6xHis-Tagged scFv
About 30 μg of boiled
bacterial antigen preparation (P. acnes and P. aeruginosa) was used as samples.
The SDS-PAGE and wet-blotting procedures were
the same as above. After blocking with 3% BSA-TBST, the membrane was
incubated in 2 μg/mL 6xHis-tagged scFv (yPac1A8 and yPgi3G4)
in TBST for 15 h at 4 °C followed by washing three times with
TBST (5 min per wash). It was then incubated with 1:5000 diluted HisProbe-HRP
(a nickel (Ni2+)-activated derivative of horseradish peroxidase)
(Thermo Fisher Scientific#15165, U.S.A.) in blocking buffer for 1
h at room temperature with slight rocking followed by washing three
times with TBST. Finally, the protein band was detected by chemiluminescence
using Amersham ECL Prime Western blotting detection reagent (GE Healthcare
#RPN2232, UK). Image analysis was performed by CCD camera-based imaging,
using the ChemiDoc XRS Gel Documentation System (Bio-Rad, U.S.A.).
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)
Monoclonal Phage ELISA
For phage ELISA, 5 μg
of bacterial antigen in 100 mM NaHCO3 (pH 8.5) was used
as a target and 1% (w/v) BSA in PBS as a negative control. The phage
ELISA was performed as previously described.[53] Virion clones that showed an OD value of at least two times higher
than those of negative controls were selected for confirmation.
scFv ELISA
For scFv ELISA, 2 μg of bacterial
antigen in 100 mM NaHCO3 (pH 8.5) was used as a target
and 1% (w/v) BSA in PBS as a negative control. The supernatant containing
soluble scFv fragments (150 μL/well) was used as a primary detection
agent. HisProbe-HRP (Thermo Fisher Scientific #15165, U.S.A.) diluted
at 1:5000 in PBS was used as a secondary detection agent. The ELISA
procedure was the same as the monoclonal phage ELISA.
scFv ELISA
against Whole Cell Bacteria
For Propionibacterium species, colonies streaked from −80
°C stock on BHI agar were inoculated into BHI broth and incubated
anaerobically for 5 days at 37 °C in the case of P. acnes and at 30 °C in the case of P. acidipropionici and P. freudenreichii. For Pseudomonas species, colonies streaked from
−80 °C stock on LB agar were inoculated into LB broth
and incubated overnight at 250 rpm at 37 °C in the case of P. aeruginosa and at 30 °C in the case of P. fluorescens and P. putida. Broth cultures were washed with PBS two times, and cells were resuspended
in PBS. The OD600 value of cell suspensions was adjusted
to 2.0. Heat inactivation was carried out in a water bath for 30 min
at 60 °C. Heat-inactivated bacteria were used for whole cell
ELISA.To check the specificity of 6xHis-tagged scFv, heat-inactivated
bacteria (109 cells/mL) was used as a target. Purified
hexa-histidine-tagged scFv (10 μg/mL) was used as a primary
detection agent and HisProbe-HRP as a secondary detection agent. The
ELISA procedure was the same as above except that the immobilization
step was performed overnight at 37 °C.
Checkerboard Titration
(CBT)
To optimize the scFv ELISA
and to determine the limit of detection of recombinant scFv, the ELISA
plate was coated with serial dilutions of heat-inactivated bacterial
suspension from rows A to F, where row A had the highest (109 cells/mL) bacterial concentration while row F had the lowest (104 cells/mL). The ELISA procedure was carried out as described
above except that the wells were incubated with six different dilutions
of scFv in duplicate format from columns 1 to 12, where columns 1
and 2 had the highest scFv concentration (yPac1A8 scFv 10 μg/mL
or yPgi3G4 scFv 40 μg/mL) while columns 11 and 12 had the lowest
(yPac1A8 scFv 0.1 μg/mL or yPgi3G4 scFv 1.0 μg/mL).
Flow Cytometry
A bacterial colony was suspended in
900 μL of PBS, and 300 μL of it was diluted with PBS to
1 mL and was centrifuged at 2000g for 5 min. The
cells were resuspended in 1 mL of 1% BSA-0.1% PBST, blocked for 30
min at room temperature, and washed two times with PBS. The cells
were incubated with specific 6xHis-tagged scFv (200 μg/mL) for
1 h at room temperature. P. acnes cells
were exposed to yPac1A8 scFv and P. aeruginosa cells to yPgi3G4 scFv. After two PBS washes, the cells were stained
with a 1:500 dilution of Dylight 488-labeled anti-hexa-histidine mouse
monoclonal antibody (Abcam #ab117512, UK) in PBS for 1 h in a dark
place at room temperature. The cells were washed with PBS two times
and resuspended in 500 μL of PBS containing 4 μg/mL PI
(propidium iodide) solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific #A28993, U.S.A.).
Sample reading was performed using an Invitrogen Attune NxT Acoustic
Focusing 3-Laser System Cytometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific# P3566,
U.S.A.).
Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM)
CLSM of Planktonic Bacteria
About 1 mL of broth culture
was centrifuged (3000g, 5 min), washed with PBS two
times, and resuspended in PBS. About 5 μL of the suspension
was spread into a smear on a glass slide and dried completely at 37
°C. The smear was fixed with 4% PFA (paraformaldehyde) in PBS
(pH 7.4) for 30 min, blocked with 1% BSA-300 mM glycine-0.1% PBST
for 30 min, treated with 2 μg of 6xHis-tagged scFv for 1 h,
incubated with 1:500 dilution of Dylight 488-labeled anti-hexa-histidine
mouse monoclonal antibody (Abcam #ab117512, UK) in PBS for 1 h, and
counterstained with 300 μM DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole)
for 5 min. The smear was washed three times with PBS between the above
steps. The stained smear was covered with slow fade gold mountant
(Invitrogen #S36936, U.S.A.) and examined with a confocal microscope
(Nikon A1R, Japan).
CLSM of Bacterial Biofilms
Bacterial
biofilm was grown
by placing autoclaved glass coverslips at the air–liquid interface
of broth cultures.[54] The incubation time
for P. acnes and P.
aeruginosa biofilms were 5 days anaerobically in the
GasPak system and overnight aerobically, respectively. Before staining,
the biofilm was washed with PBS three times and dried completely at
37 °C. The staining procedure was the same as above except that
20 μg of 6xHis-tagged scFv was used. One set of biofilms was
used for crystal violet staining.
Transmission Electron Microscopy
(TEM)
The procedure
was carried out in a microcentrifuge tube. Bacteria in broth culture
were centrifuged at 3000g for 5 min, washed with
0.85% NaCl followed by PBS, and fixed with 4% PFA (pH 7.4) in PBS
for 30 min at room temperature. After washing with PBS two times,
the bacteria were blocked with 1% BSA-300 mM glycine in 0.1% PBST
for 30 min at room temperature followed by two PBS washes. Then, 50
μg of 6xHis-tagged scFv in PBS was added and incubated for 60
min at room temperature. After washing two times with PBS, a 1:20
dilution of 10 nm Ni-NTA nanogold (Nanoprobes #2084, U.S.A.) in 0.05%
TBST containing 1% BSA, which is the recommended dilution from the
manufacturer, was added and incubated for 30 min at room temperature
followed by two TBST-BSA washes. Then, the samples were resuspended
in PBS, dehydrated by the graded ethanoldehydration method, and polymerized
in LR White medium grade resin and accelerator (EMS #14380, U.S.A.)
in a BEEM embedding capsule (EMS #69911-01, U.S.A.) by a cold curing
method. Finally, ultra-thin sections were examined with a transmission
electron microscope (Hitachi Hi-Tech HT7700, Japan).
Authors: Julie Lobstein; Charlie A Emrich; Chris Jeans; Melinda Faulkner; Paul Riggs; Mehmet Berkmen Journal: Microb Cell Fact Date: 2012-05-08 Impact factor: 5.328