Krishnan Anand1, Naeem Sheik Abdul2, Terisha Ghazi2, Muthusamy Ramesh3, Gaurav Gupta4, Murtaza M Tambuwala5,6, Harish Dureja7, Sachin Kumar Singh8, Dinesh Kumar Chellappan9, Kamal Dua10,11,12, Boomi Pandi13, Muthupandian Saravanan14, Anil Amichund Chuturgoon2. 1. Department of Chemical Pathology, School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences and National Health Laboratory Service, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa. 2. Discipline of Medical Biochemistry, School of Laboratory Medicine and Medical Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4041, South Africa. 3. Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Omega College of Pharmacy, Hyderabad 501 301, India. 4. School of Pharmacy, Suresh Gyan Vihar University, Jagatpura Mahal Road, Jaipur 302017, India. 5. School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Science, Ulster University, Coleraine, County Londonderry, Northern Ireland BT52 1SA, United Kingdom. 6. School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster, Coleraine, Northern Ireland BT52 1SA, United Kingdom. 7. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak 124001 Haryana, India. 8. School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab 144411, India. 9. School of Pharmacy, International Medical University, Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur 57000, Malaysia. 10. Discipline of Pharmacy, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, New South Wales 2007, Australia. 11. Priority Research Centre for Healthy Lungs, Hunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI) & School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, The University of Newcastle (UoN), Callaghan, New South Wales 2308, Australia. 12. School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences, Solan 173229, India. 13. Department of Bioinformatics, Alagappa University, Karaikudi 630 003, India. 14. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Division of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Mekelle University, Mekelle 1871, Ethiopia.
Abstract
In this study, novel self-assembled carbazole-thiooctanoic acid nanoparticles (CTNs) were synthesized from amino carbazole (a mutagen) and thiooctanoic acid (an antioxidant). The nanoparticles were characterized using hyperspectral techniques. Then, the antiproliferative potential of CTNs was determined in HepG2 liver carcinoma cells. This study employed a solvent-antisolvent interaction method to synthesize a spherical CTN of size less than 50 nm. Moreover, CT was subsequently capped to gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) in the additional comparative studies. The CT derivative was synthesized from carbazole and lipoic acid by the amide bond formation reaction using a coupling agent. Furthermore, it was characterized using infrared (IR), 1H nuclear magnetic resonance, dynamic light scattering (DLS), and transmission electron microscopy techniques. The CT-capped gold nanoparticles (CTAuNPs) were prepared from CT, chloroauric acid, and NaBH4. The CTAuNPs were characterized using ultraviolet-visible, high-resolution TEM, DLS, and Fourier transform IR techniques. The cytotoxicity and apoptosis-inducing ability of both nanoparticles were determined in HepG2 cells. The results demonstrate that CTNs exhibit antiproliferative activity in the cancerous HepG2 cells. Moreover, molecular docking and molecular dynamics studies were conducted to explore the therapeutic potential of CT against human EGFR suppressor protein to gain more insights into the binding mode of the CT, which may show a significant role in anticancer therapy.
In this study, novel self-assembled carbazole-thiooctanoic acid nanoparticles (CTNs) were synthesized from amino carbazole (a mutagen) and thiooctanoic acid (an antioxidant). The nanoparticles were characterized using hyperspectral techniques. Then, the antiproliferative potential of CTNs was determined in HepG2liver carcinoma cells. This study employed a solvent-antisolvent interaction method to synthesize a spherical CTN of size less than 50 nm. Moreover, CT was subsequently capped to gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) in the additional comparative studies. The CT derivative was synthesized from carbazole and lipoic acid by the amide bond formation reaction using a coupling agent. Furthermore, it was characterized using infrared (IR), 1H nuclear magnetic resonance, dynamic light scattering (DLS), and transmission electron microscopy techniques. The CT-capped gold nanoparticles (CTAuNPs) were prepared from CT, chloroauric acid, and NaBH4. The CTAuNPs were characterized using ultraviolet-visible, high-resolution TEM, DLS, and Fourier transform IR techniques. The cytotoxicity and apoptosis-inducing ability of both nanoparticles were determined in HepG2 cells. The results demonstrate that CTNs exhibit antiproliferative activity in the cancerousHepG2 cells. Moreover, molecular docking and molecular dynamics studies were conducted to explore the therapeutic potential of CT against humanEGFR suppressor protein to gain more insights into the binding mode of the CT, which may show a significant role in anticancer therapy.
Chemotherapeutic
agents play a vital role in the treatment of cancer.
Among them, carbazoles (a model DNA intercalator) and their derivatives
have potential biological activities.[1] The
enhanced cellular internalization of carbazole and its reduced toxicity
to normal cells are significant in biological studies. In the recent
past, nanodrug-based strategies are widely used to combat multidrug
resistance.[2] The enhanced permeability
and retention effect of self-assembled nanoparticles has garnered
significant interest in drug delivery. A compound that combines two
different drugs in one molecule has shown a synergistic effect in
the treatment of diseases, and it can produce enhanced pharmacological
effects. Such compounds are referred to as twin drugs and often show
two different pharmacological activities in cancer cells.[3] Although several metals are used for nanosynthesis,
gold (inert metal) is preferred in medicine because of its low toxicity
in healthy human cells. In general, antibodies and targeting moieties
are conjugated by adsorption to the gold surface. A drawback of surface
adsorption is the susceptibility of proteins to denaturation and in
some cases limited ligand interactions with cell surface targets due
to steric hindrance.[4] The capping of organic
ligands such as amines, thiols,[5] dithiols,
and so forth adds stability to gold nanoparticles. The interaction
between a ligand and a nanometal has been investigated earlier.[6] Dithiol ligands were conjugated to gold nanoparticles
by sulfur ends.[7] The organic-capping layer
formed during metal–ligand interactions plays a vital role
in high-performance biomaterials.[8] Lipoic
acid (LA) is a vitamin-like bioactive small molecule and is an antioxidant.
The antioxidant exhibits important therapeutic potential under conditions
where oxidative stress (ROS) is involved. It is a sulfur-rich compound
found in cruciferous vegetables like broccoli and cabbage.[9]Self-assembled nanoparticle-based drug-delivery
systems are the
most important for cancer chemotherapy and they are considered a better
system because of their stability in the bloodstream, high drug loading,
and controllable release from carriers at target sites.[10] Moreover, this strategy can improve the efficiency
of cellular uptake because of their ability to enhance drug-delivery
efficacy and reduce drug side effects. Different amphiphilic drug–drug
conjugates have been made using dissimilar hydrophobic and hydrophilic
drugs (Figure ). The resulting amphiphilic
twin drugs could self-assemble into nanoparticles with high drug loading
and improve cancer therapeutic efficacy. For example, irinotecan as
a hydrophilic anticancer drug and a chlorambucil hydrophobic anticancer
drug were conjugated through the hydrolyzable ester linkage.[11] The amphiphilic nanoparticles were composed
of two drug–drug conjugates, including doxorubicin (DOX)-chlorambucil
(Cb) and irinotecan (Ir)–Cb conjugates. Floxuridine (FdU) as
a hydrophilic anticancer drug was tethered with a hydrophobic anticancer
drug of bendamustine to form an amphiphilic twin drug.[12] The twin drug molecules interconnected by an
ester bond or an amide bond could readily self-assemble into stable
and uniform nanoparticles. The nanoparticles can be delivered to the
action sites of a body via physical entrapment or chemical conjugation
and better therapeutic efficacy against tumors without side effects
over free drugs can be achieved. More importantly, after uptake by
tumor cells and chemoenzymatic activity, the conjugates could be easily
disintegrated into individual free drugs, which can induce nonoverlapping
but synergistic pharmacological effects and simultaneously improve
the therapeutic efficacy in vitro. Direct conjugation of hydrophobic
drugs and small organic compounds is recently established as a new
nano-drug delivery system. Because of a wide variety of therapeutic
applications, nitrogen-containing heterocycles hold their significance
in medicine,[13] and carbazole derivatives
are one such example. The thiooctanoic acid (lipoic acid) belongs
to the family of tocopherols and tocotrienols. The mutagen, amino
carbazole (AC) and the antioxidant, lipoic acid (LA) are the unique
compounds; they are expected to excel for cancer therapeutic applications
and may be suitable candidates to solve the drawbacks. In the present
study, the hydrophobic AC and hydrophilic LA were chosen for achieving
a synergistic combination in chemotherapy. Moreover, carbazole thiooctanoic
acid (CT)-functionalized gold nanoparticles were synthesized. The
newly synthesized carbazole self-assembled nanoparticles and conjugated
gold nanoparticles were evaluated for their antiproliferative activities
against HepG2 cells. The amphiphilic self-assembled nanoparticles
(CTN) increased the activity of the extrinsic caspase 8, intrinsic
caspase 9, and executioner caspases and LDH release was not altered
significantly suggesting apoptosis instead of necrosis. Furthermore,
the molecular docking and molecular dynamics of mono CT molecules
to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) were studied, to explore
the other possible targets.
Figure 1
Literature-reported amphiphilic drug–drug
conjugate for
cancer therapy.
Literature-reported amphiphilic drug–drug
conjugate for
cancer therapy.
Results and Discussion
The compound CT [3] was synthesized by reacting 3-amino-9-ethyl
carbazole (AC) [1] and LA [2] in the presence
of HBTU and DIEA. The base deprotonates the carboxylic acid. The resulting
carboxylate anion attacks the electron-deficient carbon atom of HBTU
(Figure ). The resulting
HOBt anion reacts with the newly formed activated carboxylic acid-derived
intermediate to form an OBt-activatedester. The amine reacts with
the OBt-activatedester to form the amide product amphiphilic CT.
Figure 2
Synthesis
of CT [3] and the plausible ‘‘amine
to amide’’ mechanism for the formation of CT.
Synthesis
of CT [3] and the plausible ‘‘amine
to amide’’ mechanism for the formation of CT.Lipoic acid is a water-soluble antioxidant and
AC is a water-insoluble
DNA intercalator. Therefore, the resulting CT molecule is amphiphilic
and self-assembles to form nanoparticles in an aqueous environment,
a benefit derived from the amphiphilic nature (Figure ). The dialysis method was employed to prepare
the self-assembled CT twin drug nanoparticles. The acetone solution
of CT was added with deionized water and dialyzed to remove the acetone,
thereby a stable nanoparticle solution was obtained with 0.5 mg/mL
concentration.
Figure 3
Schematic route for the formation of an amphiphilic twin
bioactive
molecule and its self-assembly for endocytosis.
Schematic route for the formation of an amphiphilic twin
bioactive
molecule and its self-assembly for endocytosis.The characteristic amphiphilicity of the CT provides a chance for
itself to self-assemble into organic nanoparticles in water. The transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) study determines the size and morphology
of the self-assembled nanoparticles (scale bars: 200 and 50 nm) (Figure ). The TEM image
shows that the CT nanoparticles aggregate into approximate spherical
particles in aqueous solution, and the size determined by TEM is about
70 ± 8.0 nm, The DLS results in (Figure ) show that the CT nanoparticle solution
forms aggregates and the mean hydrodynamic diameter of CT nanoparticle
aggregates is about 371.5 nm with a narrow unimodal size distribution.
This size is smaller than that measured by DLS because of the shrinkage
of CT nanoparticles in a drying nonsolvated state during TEM sample
preparation. The solution of CT nanoparticles was stored at 4 °C
in a refrigerator. The value of PDI is always under 0.041 at room
temperature (RT) (Figure ). The results demonstrate that CT nanoparticles are extremely
stable during storage.
Figure 4
Morphology of amphiphilic CT nanoparticles.
Figure 5
Dynamic light scattering (DLS) profile: size distribution of CT
nanoparticles with PDI:0.041.
Morphology of amphiphilic CT nanoparticles.Dynamic light scattering (DLS) profile: size distribution of CT
nanoparticles with PDI:0.041.The CT-capped gold nanoparticles (CTAuNPs) were formed by the addition
of an aqueous solution of CT to the chloroauric acid solution. After
stirring the solution at RT, NaBH4 was added dropwise. Figure shows the synthesis
of CTAuNPs.
Figure 6
The outline for the synthesis of CTAuNPs.
The outline for the synthesis of CTAuNPs.The formation of gold nanoparticles was initially confirmed when
the solution turned into ruby red color. In Figure , the UV–vis spectra of CTAuNPs are
shown. The characteristic peak at 530 nm (Figure curve a) indicates the formation of gold
nanoparticles, which was because of the surface plasmon excitation
of gold nanoparticles.[26] A bathochromic
shift with the appearance of a broad peak at 552 nm (Figure curve b) was observed because
of the aggregation and surface modification of gold nanoparticles.
When carbazole interacted with the gold nanoparticle, the ruby red
color rapidly changed into blue.
Figure 7
UV–vis spectra of gold nanoparticles,
line (A) (red color)
and CTAuNPs, line (B) (blue color).
UV–vis spectra of gold nanoparticles,
line (A) (red color)
and CTAuNPs, line (B) (blue color).The UV–vis spectrum of the synthesized gold nanoparticles
was obtained. The size and shape of the nanoparticles were observed
with a transmission electron microscope. Zeta potential measurements
were carried out using a dynamic light scattering instrument. The
observed nanoparticles were monodispersed and exactly spherical or
nearly spherical with size ranging from 5–10 nm (Figure ). Also, spherical-shaped gold
nanoparticles were observed.
Figure 8
High-resolution TEM images of (A) gold nanoparticles,
(B) gold
nanoparticles capped with CT, and (C) part of spherical gold nanoparticles
and their corresponding fast Fourier transformed image.
High-resolution TEM images of (A) gold nanoparticles,
(B) gold
nanoparticles capped with CT, and (C) part of spherical gold nanoparticles
and their corresponding fast Fourier transformed image.Zeta potential is an indication of colloidal stability.[27] Zeta potential of nanoparticles with >+30
or
< −30 mV is more stable. Colloids having a lower zeta potential
result in aggregation because of Van Der Waals forces.[27] Different principles were adopted for the measurement
of the particle size using HRTEM and DLS. Hence, the particle size
measured by HRTEM and DLS differs marginally. Zeta potential was found
to be −0.172 mV (Figure B), which shows their least stability. The average hydrodynamic
particle size obtained by DLS is 45 nm (Figure A), which is identical to that obtained by
HRTEM.
Figure 9
(A) Particle size distribution of CTAuNPs using the DLS method
(B) Zeta potential measurement using a Zetasizer.
(A) Particle size distribution of CTAuNPs using the DLS method
(B) Zeta potential measurement using a Zetasizer.Figure shows
the FTIR spectra, which compare CT and CTAuNPs. A stretching frequency
at 3237 and 1587 cm–1 confirmed the NH and S–S
functional groups of CTN. The NH stretching band was observed for
CTAuNPs, but it was shifted to higher values. Also, the sulfur bond
present in CT was absent in CTAuNPs, thereby confirming an attachment
of CT into the gold surface. The S–S group was present in the
IR spectra as indicated in Figure A,B, indicating that it did not participate in any
linkage or interaction with the gold surface.
Figure 10
FTIR Profile of CT (line
A) and CTAuNPs (line B).
FTIR Profile of CT (line
A) and CTAuNPs (line B).
In Vitro
Assays
The anticancer potential
of CTN and CTAuNPs was determined using a liver carcinoma-derived
(HepG2) cell line. The antiproliferative activities were screened
using the MTT assay.The decrease in cell viability after exposure
for 6 h was dose-dependent with higher concentrations displaying the
most significant loss to cell viability. IC50 values obtained
for CTN and CTAuNPs were 91.3 and 432 μg/mL, respectively (Figure ). While gold-capped
nanoparticles easily penetrate cell membranes and are often described
as an effective drug carrier, our data indicate that the self-assembled
organic CTNs displayed greater effectiveness in decreasing cell viability
when compared to the gold derivative. Gold nanoparticles display diverse
and unique properties that may contribute to cell protective mechanisms
after acute treatments such as antioxidant defense mechanisms and
altered the energy flux. Therefore, only CTN was selected for further
biological assessment.
Figure 11
MTT evaluation of cell viability for CTN (A)
and CTAuNPs (B) in
HepG2 cells.
MTT evaluation of cell viability for CTN (A)
and CTAuNPs (B) in
HepG2 cells.The cytotoxic potential of carbazole
derivatives has already been
estimated using several in vitro models.[28] Our innovative conjugation of a carbazole to an antioxidant and
a mitochondrial stimulator, that is, α-LA, has shown a profound
effect on caspase initiation and activation (a marker for apoptosis).
Apoptosis or programmed cell death regulates the elimination of damaged
cells to maintain homeostasis. Caspases are critical facilitators
of apoptosis as they initiate and execute the process via two pathways:
the extrinsic and the intrinsic pathways. The extrinsic pathway is
stimulated by ligands binding to receptors that regulate downstream
adaptor molecules resulting in caspase 8 activation (Figure ). The intrinsic pathway involves
the binding of caspase 9 to the apoptotic protease-activating factor-1
(APAF-1) apoptosome complex in response to mitochondrial signals such
as membrane depolarization. Both pathways result in the activation
of executioner caspases, caspases 3/7.
Figure 12
Schematic representation
of CTN-induced apoptosis.
Schematic representation
of CTN-induced apoptosis.Our data indicate the enhanced activity of executioner caspases
3/7 (Figure C).
The initiators of the extrinsic (Figure A) and intrinsic (Figure B) apoptotic pathways are also upregulated.
It is intriguing that caspase activity increases in a dose-dependent
manner but drastically decreases at the highest CTN concentration.
We speculate that this may be because of membrane receptor saturation
and rapid ATP depletion (Figure ).
Figure 13
(A) CTN increased the activity of the extrinsic caspase
8, (B)
intrinsic caspase 9, and (C) executioner caspases 3/7. Key: ***p < 0.001 p < 0.05.
Figure 14
Effect of CTN on ATP detection.
(A) CTN increased the activity of the extrinsic caspase
8, (B)
intrinsic caspase 9, and (C) executioner caspases 3/7. Key: ***p < 0.001 p < 0.05.Effect of CTN on ATP detection.The plasma membrane integrity was evaluated by determining LDH
release into the supernatant. Plasma membrane leakage is strongly
correlated with overt cytotoxicity and necrotic cell death. We observed
no significant changes to the levels of released LDH (Figure ) suggesting that apoptosis
was responsible for cell death and not necrosis. The results are in
agreement with the caspase activity assays. Triggering apoptosis without
overt necrosis would be the preferred means of destroying cancer cells
as it dampens many of the damaging side effects. This is important
to normal healthy cells that may not be affected by the drug and hence
eliminate any unwanted side effects generally associated with chemotherapy.
Figure 15
Effect
of CTN on LDH leakage.
Effect
of CTN on LDH leakage.
In Silico
Analysis to Investigate the Other
Anticancer Target
Molecular docking and molecular dynamics
are the in silico approaches to predict the ligand-binding pose inside
the target protein or host molecule.[29] The
application of molecular docking to predict the therapeutic and metabolic
profiles has been well documented.[30] In
the present study, molecular docking and molecular dynamics have been
employed to investigate the therapeutic anticancer potential of carbazole,
LA, and CT.Molecular docking has been used as a tool to evaluate
the interaction and geometric conformation of a ligand-biological
target.[31] The potential mechanism of carbazole
is the inhibition of EGFR. The EGFR is a validated target for the
treatment of cancer.[28,32] Therefore, carbazole, LA, and
CT were docked into the binding site of the EGFR to explore the anticancer
therapeutic potential. Carbazole, LA, and CT were, respectively, shown
the docking scores of −7.2, −4.8, and −7.9 kcal/mol
(Table ). The range
of root mean square deviation (rmsd) for each of the molecule [AC,
LA, and CT] from the top ten ranked pose is shown in Table . CT has shown the highest docking
scores of (−7.9 kcal/mol) in comparison to carbazole and LA.
CT is the combined molecular fragments of carbazole and LA. The combined
molecular feature may be responsible for the achievement of the highest
molecular docking score. The interacting residues of EGFR and its
interaction with mono CT are shown in Figures and 17. Val21, Leu22,
Ala47, Thr92, Asp157, and Arg143 were found to be binding site residues
for CT at the binding site of the EGFR in molecular docking.
Table 1
Molecular
Docking Scores of the Molecules
(Aminocarbazole, Lipoic Acid, and CT)
no.
molecule
docking scores
RMSD (lb)
RMSD
(ub)
1.
aminocarbazole
–7.2
0.00–1.598
0.0–4.567
2.
LA
–4.8
0.00–4.479
0.0–5.888
3.
CT
–7.9
0.0–3.202
0.0–6.032
Figure 16
Interaction
pattern of CT with the EGFR in molecular docking.
Figure 17
Binding
landscape of CT inside the ligand binding site of the EGFR
in molecular docking.
Interaction
pattern of CT with the EGFR in molecular docking.Binding
landscape of CT inside the ligand binding site of the EGFR
in molecular docking.The highest docking score of −7.9 kcal/mol
has been obtained
for the complex of CT with EGFR in molecular docking. Therefore, the
complex has been subjected to molecular dynamics simulations. The
results of molecular dynamics simulations help to ensure the binding
affinity of the ligand and stability of the complex from the estimated
values of energy components. Molecular dynamics simulation was carried
out for the complex of CT with EGFR using AMBER 18.[33] Initially, the molecular docking complex was pretreated
in Chimera before subjecting to molecular dynamics.[34] The ligand-bound complex was used as an initial geometry
for molecular dynamics. The ligand and the protein were parametrized
in Antechamber and tleap.[35] The complex was neutralized by adding (Na+/Cl–) as counter ions and the complex was solvated using the TIP3P water
model.[36] The minimization of the complex
was carried out for 200 steps. The heating and equilibrium were conducted
at 300 K. Then, the simulation of the complex system was carried out
for 5 ns.[37] The results of the trajectories
were saved for every 1 ps and were analyzed using the CPPTRAJ module.[38] After the 5 ns simulation, the binding free
energy of the ligand–protein complex (CT with the EGFR) was
estimated using the molecular mechanics/Poisson Boltzmann surface
area (MM/PBSA) method. The estimated energy components are depicted
in Table . The estimated
VDWAALS components were found to be −45.31 kcal/mol. The stability
and flexibility of the complex were analyzed from the RMSD and RMSF
plot (Figure ).
Moreover, the complex has shown a strong binding free energy of (−39.86
kcal/mol) according to the binding free energy calculations (Table ). This strong binding
affinity of CT with EGFR shows its therapeutic potential as an anticancer
agent.
Table 2
Energy Components of the CT–EGFR
Complex Calculated using Molecular Dynamics Simulations
energy component
average
std. dev.
std. err. of mean
VDWAALS
–45.3100
3.8646
0.3865
EEL
–15.7461
7.0271
0.7027
EGB
27.0712
4.9542
0.4954
ESURF
–5.8744
0.3937
0.0394
DELTA G gas
–61.0561
9.8450
0.9845
DELTA
G solv
21.1968
4.6821
0.4682
DELTA TOTAL
–39.8593
6.1557
0.6156
Figure 18
(A) RMSD and (B) RMSF plots of the CT with the EGFR complex obtained
using molecular dynamics simulations.
(A) RMSD and (B) RMSF plots of the CT with the EGFR complex obtained
using molecular dynamics simulations.
Conclusions
In this
study, self-assembled amphiphilic CTNs, that is, aminocarbazole
(mutagen) and LA (antioxidant), were utilized as two in one molecule
to investigate the biochemical mechanism of the binary molecules on
humancancerous liver (HepG2) cells. The CTAuNPs were synthesized,
characterized, and apoptotic induction activity of the same was studied.
To prove the interaction between disulfide and AuNPs, the spectroscopic
analysis was performed. It showed the disulfide group of carbazole
LA acts as a potential site to conjugate with the gold surface at
the nanoscale, resulting in carbazole-capped gold nanoparticles. The
CTN increased the activity of the extrinsic caspase 8, intrinsic caspase
9, and executioner caspases and LDH release was not altered significantly
suggesting apoptosis instead of necrosis in liver carcinoma (HepG2)
cells. The results indicated that self-assembled carbazole nanoparticles
CTN induce apoptosis in the absence of overt necrosis in liver carcinoma
(HepG2) cells and it may be a novel anticancer agent. Moreover, the
in silico studies like molecular docking and molecular dynamics have
shown the strong binding affinity for CT with EGFR. In postdynamics,
this complex has shown substantial stability during the simulation.
Therefore, CT may act as a potential anticancer agent.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals and Reagents
Gold (III)
chloride trihydrate (HAuCl4·3H2O), 9-ethyl-3-AC,
hexafluorophosphate benzotriazole tetramethyl uranium (HBTU), diisopropylethylamine
(DIEA), LA, and NaBH4 were procured from Sigma-Aldrich,
South Africa. Other chemicals were procured as analytical grade and
do not require purification. Reagents used for the study were prepared
using distilled water. Glassware was washed thoroughly using aqua
regia followed by double-distilled water.
Synthesis
of Novel CT
15 mL of dimethylformamide
(DMF) and 5 mL of tetrahydrofuran (THF) were used to solubilize LA
(0.55 g, 2.75 mmol) and then added with HBTU (1 g, 3.05 mmol), DIEA
(1 mL, 6.00 mmol), and 9-ethyl-3-AC (0.56 g, 2.7 mmol). The resulting
mixture was fully dissolved using a magnetic stirrer at RT. TLC analysis
was performed to check for conjugation. 50 mL of distilled water was
added to the resulting mixture and then extracted with ethyl acetate
(25 mL) three times. The ethyl acetate layer was combined and then
dried by passing it through anhydrous sodium sulfate followed by evaporation
to yield a crude product. Finally, a white solid CT was obtained after
purification using column chromatography (50:50 EtOAc/hexane). Yield:
1.10 g (92%); mp: 120 °C; IR (KBr, cm–1): 3462.01,
3237.92, 3058.40, 2917.84, 2513.46, 2513.46, 1900.406, 1773.85, 1736.05,
1650.38, 1587.43, 1542.65, 1485.11, 1382.07, 1277.01, 1228.44, 1152.46,
1123.774, 1085.725, 1060.128, 1020.12, 1020.128, 978.56, 888.97, 821.95; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 1.35 (m,
2H), 1.39 (s, 3H), 1.56 (q, 2H), 1.68 (m, 2H), 1.80 (m, 2H), 2.40
(t, 2H), 2.62 (m, 1H), 3.34 (m, 2H), 3.5 (t, 1H), 4.35 (q, 2H), 7.0–7.1
(s, 1H), 7.16–7.19 (t, H), 7.29 (s, 1H), 7.31.(s, 1H), 7.37–7.36
(d, 1H), 7.418–7.41 (m, 1H), 8.20 (d, 1H), 8.42 (t, 1H); 13C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 171.00,
140.44, 137.23, 129.61, 125.85, 123.02, 122.75, 120.66, 119.49, 118.73,
112.91, 108.53, 108.45, 58.43, 40.28, 48.48, 37.39, 37.37, 34.69,
33.94, 28.93, 25.43, 24.94, 13.80.
Formation
of Carbazole Nanoparticles
At RT, novel CT twin bioactive
molecules (25 mg) were dissolved in
acetone (20 mL). All the prepared CT solutions were syringe filtered
(pore size 0.22 μm). Subsequently, the antisolvent deionized
water (20 mL) was added in drops to the solution and stirred gently
for half an hour, and the nanoparticle was precipitated. This technique
was termed as the antisolvent precipitation technique. The appearance
of turbidity indicated the formation of amphiphile CTNs from CT twin
bioactive molecules.
Characterization of Carbazole
Nanoparticles
Particle size (z-average diameter,
d/nm), polydispersity
index (PDI), Figure , and zeta potential of the precipitated nanoparticles were analyzed
using DLS (Zetasizer Nano ZS, Malvern Instrument Ltd., UK) at 25 °C.
Particle size and shape of the nanoparticles were characterized by
TEM, Figure . CTNNPs
(1 μL) were kept on formvar-coated grids, air-dried, and observed
at 100 kV for TEM (JEOL 1010 TEM using a Megaview III camera and iTEM
software) studies.
Synthesis of Novel Carbazole
Thiooctanoic
Acid-Capped Gold Nanoparticles
The sodium borohydride reduction
method was adopted to synthesize gold nanoparticles.[14] Briefly, 0.01 g of NaBH4 was employed to reduce
tetrachloroauric acid (10–4 M) leading to the synthesis
of gold nanoparticles of 5 nm in diameter. The resulting nanoparticle
solution was ruby-red in color. Subsequently, 10–3 M aqueous solution of CT was used as a capping agent for gold nanoparticles.
Then, the solution was repeatedly centrifuged (10,000 rpm for 1 h)
to purify the CTAu NPs.The absorption spectra (200–800
nm) of the capped gold nanoparticle solution were measured using an
ultraviolet–visible UV–vis spectrometer (Varian Cary-50
UV spectrophotometer linked to a TCC-240A Shimadzu heating vessel
temperature-controlled cell holder). To analyze the size and shape,
1 μL of the CTAu NPs was kept on formvar-coated grids, air-dried,
and observed using a transmission electron microscope. For FTIR studies,
CTAu NPs were purified by centrifugation (10,000 rpm for 10 min) and
the resulting pellet was washed thrice using distilled water (20 mL).
Then, the FTIR spectra were recorded using a Varian 800 FTIR spectrophotometer.
Particle size and zeta potential were measured using a DLS Malvern
Zetasizer Nano ZS (Malvern Instruments Ltd, UK) Merck 2423 instrument.
Cell Culture
The HepG2human liver
carcinoma cells were grown in 25 cm3 culture flasks (37
°C, 5% CO2) in complete culture media (CCM, Eagles
Minimum Essential media, supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 1% l-glutamine, and 1% penicillin–streptomycin–fungizone)
until obtaining 90% confluence. Then, the cells were harvested by
trypsinization and used for the relevant assays.
Cell Viability
MTT assay was adopted
to analyze the cell viability. HepG2 cells (15,000 cells/well) were
seeded in a 96 well microtiter plate and incubated overnight to adhere
to the plate. The cells were incubated for 6 h with varying concentrations
of CTN and CTAu (0–750 μg/mL) in five replicates. The
plate was incubated at 37 °C for 4 h after the addition of 120
μL of the MTT/CCM solution (5 mg/mL) into each well. Supernatants
were decanted, added with 100 μL of DMSO, and incubated for
1 h (37 °C). The absorbance was read using a spectrophotometer
(Bio-Tek μQuant) at a wavelength of 570/690 nm. The percentage
of viable cells was measured and a dose–response curve was
generated from which the IC50 value was extrapolated.For further analysis, the cells were exposed to sub and overt IC50 concentrations for a dose-dependent study of the novel compound.
All these experiments were performed thrice independently in triplicate.
ATP Assay
HepG2 cells (20,000 cells)
were seeded into each well of the 96 well-plate along with 20 μL
CellTire Glo reagent (Promega, Madison, USA) and incubated in the
dark for 30 min at RT. The luminescent signal was then read using
a Modulus microplate luminometer (Turner Biosystems, Sunnyvale, USA).
The strength of the signal corresponds to the concentration of intracellular
ATP. The results were mentioned in mean relative light units (RLU).
All these experiments were repeated thrice in triplicate.
Caspase Assay
The Caspase Glo 8,
9 and 3/7 Assay kits (Promega, Madison, USA) were used to detect caspase
activity. The same procedure was followed for the listed caspases:
treated and untreated cells (20,000 cells) were seeded into each well
of the 96 well-plate along with 20 μL of the Caspase Glo reagent
(prepared as per the instruction manual) and incubated in the dark
for 30 min at RT. The luminescence was detected and quantified using
a Modulus microplate luminometer (Turner Biosystems, Sunnyvale, USA).
The data were represented as mean RLU.
LDH
Assay
The LDH cytotoxicity detection
kit (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) was employed to determine cell death
that occurred through membrane damage. Briefly, the supernatants (100
μL) of control and treated cells were added to the wells of
96-well microtiter plate followed by the substrate mixture and left
for 25 min at RT, for the reaction to occur. Here, the substrate mixture
has a catalyst (diaphorase/NAD+) and dye (INT/sodium lactate). Optical
density was recorded spectrophotometrically at 500 nm (Bio-Tek uQuant).
The results are expressed in mean ± standard deviation (SD) of
optical density. All these experiments were repeated thrice in triplicate.
Molecular Docking
Molecular docking is used
as a tool to view the interaction/selectivity
of a ligand to the active site pocket of protein.[15] The 3D structure of EGFR (PDB code:6JXT) was
acquired from the protein data bank.[16] The
structure of carbazole, LA, and CT was built using ChemDraw software.
To optimize the geometry of the ligand, the MM2 force field was employed.[17] The docking was carried out to study the interactions
and the binding affinity of barbazole, LA, and CT with the EGFR. A
grid box with a spacing of 1 Å and a size of 15 × 15 ×
15 pointing in x, y, and z directions was defined at the proximity of the bound ligand
in the EGFR using the standard protocol.[18,19] Then, the molecules were docked using AutoDockVina[17] with standard docking parameters. The Lamarckian Genetic
Algorithm was used as the search algorithm with standard parameter
values.[20] The ideal docked conformation
was chosen for further investigations. Details of the docking parameters
are described in our previous communications[21,22] PyMol,[23] Discovery Studio Visualizer,[24] and LigPlot+[25] were employed to visualize and analyze the structure of the docked
complex.
Statistical Analysis
Biological experiments
were conducted thrice (independently). Statistical
data were evaluated by one way ANOVA and the Bonferroni test for multiple
group comparisons. Results are expressed in mean ± SD unless
mentioned. Results with p < 0.05 are statistically
significant.
Authors: Eric F Pettersen; Thomas D Goddard; Conrad C Huang; Gregory S Couch; Daniel M Greenblatt; Elaine C Meng; Thomas E Ferrin Journal: J Comput Chem Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 3.376