Literature DB >> 33457421

Differential Diagnosis of Cesarean Scar Pregnancies and Other Pregnancies Implanted in the Lower Uterus by Ultrasound Parameters.

Kangning Li1, Qing Dai2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cesarean scar pregnancy is an extremely rare type of ectopic pregnancy implanted in the myometrium at the site of a previous cesarean section scar. On the other hand, pregnancies are considered low implantations if they are identified in the lower third of the uterus without the sac implanted into the scar and have a better prognosis. Early diagnosis of both types of pregnancies can help avoid serious complications. This study is aimed at investigating the significance of transvaginal ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of cesarean scar pregnancies and pregnancies implanted in the lower uterus.
METHODS: Ninety-three patients with an average age of 32.7 years (range, 24-43 years) were enrolled in this study, including 66 cesarean scar pregnancies and 27 other pregnancies implanted in the lower uterus, and they were examined by transvaginal ultrasound.
RESULTS: We observed significant differences in the relationship between the cesarean sac and the scar, the source of the trophoblastic blood flow, and the thickness of the residual muscle between the cesarean scar pregnancy group and the lower uterus pregnancy group. We established the logistic model to improve the differential diagnosis of cesarean scar pregnancies and pregnancies implanted in the lower uterus.
CONCLUSIONS: Transvaginal ultrasound is recommended in early pregnancy, especially for patients who have undergone a previous cesarean section delivery.
Copyright © 2020 Kangning Li and Qing Dai.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33457421      PMCID: PMC7787742          DOI: 10.1155/2020/8904507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Res Int            Impact factor:   3.411


  17 in total

1.  High prevalence of defects in Cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination.

Authors:  O Vikhareva Osser; L Jokubkiene; L Valentin
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 2.  Outcome of Cesarean scar pregnancy managed expectantly: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  G Calì; I E Timor-Tritsch; J Palacios-Jaraquemada; A Monteaugudo; D Buca; F Forlani; A Familiari; G Scambia; G Acharya; F D'Antonio
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 3.  Cesarean scar pregnancy is a precursor of morbidly adherent placenta.

Authors:  I E Timor-Tritsch; A Monteagudo; G Cali; A Vintzileos; R Viscarello; A Al-Khan; S Zamudio; P Mayberry; M M Cordoba; P Dar
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 7.299

4.  Easy sonographic differential diagnosis between intrauterine pregnancy and cesarean delivery scar pregnancy in the early first trimester.

Authors:  Ilan E Timor-Tritsch; Ana Monteagudo; Giuseppe Cali; Hazem El Refaey; Andrea Kaelin Agten; Alan A Arslan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 5.  Antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta: a review.

Authors:  C H Comstock
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 7.299

6.  An ectopic pregnancy developing in a previous caesarian section scar.

Authors:  P A Godin; S Bassil; J Donnez
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Identifying sonographic markers for placenta accreta in the first trimester.

Authors:  Jerasimos Ballas; Dolores Pretorius; Andrew D Hull; Robert Resnik; Gladys A Ramos
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  Surgical treatment of Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided suction curettage.

Authors:  D Jurkovic; J Knez; A Appiah; L Farahani; D Mavrelos; J A Ross
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 9.  Effect of early pregnancy on a previous lower segment cesarean section scar.

Authors:  W Weimin; L Wenqing
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.561

10.  Cesarean section scar defects: agreement between transvaginal sonographic findings with and without saline contrast enhancement.

Authors:  O Vikhareva Osser; L Jokubkiene; L Valentin
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.299

View more
  2 in total

1.  Mid-trimester cesarean scar pregnancy: a case report.

Authors:  Mary Louise Fowler; Sarah Little; Michael Muto; Shruthi Mahalingaiah
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2021-04-23

2.  Investigation and Analysis of Influencing Factors of Moderate to Severe Pain After Uterine Artery Embolization in Patients with Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.

Authors:  Cai-Feng Lan; Bi-Hua Lin; Cai-Ling Nie; Xiu-Ling Guo; Dan-Hong Zhou; Yan-Juan Lin
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-11-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.