Literature DB >> 26899908

Easy sonographic differential diagnosis between intrauterine pregnancy and cesarean delivery scar pregnancy in the early first trimester.

Ilan E Timor-Tritsch1, Ana Monteagudo2, Giuseppe Cali3, Hazem El Refaey4, Andrea Kaelin Agten2, Alan A Arslan2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a serious complication of pregnancy, which consists of implantation of the gestational sac in the hysterotomy scar. This condition is increasing in frequency and often poses a diagnostic challenge. Its diagnosis is dependent on visual assessment of the uterus on the longitudinal sagittal ultrasound plane. Misdiagnosing a low intrauterine chorionic sac as a CSP, or a true scar pregnancy as an intrauterine pregnancy (IUP), may lead to adverse outcomes including hysterectomy.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to describe a sonographic method for the differential diagnosis of CSP vs IUP in early gestation. The current study tests the hypothesis that on a first-trimester ultrasound performed between 5-10 weeks of gestation, the relative location of the center of gestational sac to the midpoint of the uterus along a longitudinal line between the external cervical os and the fundus can be used for early detection of CSPs. STUDY
DESIGN: This is a retrospective review of electronically archived ultrasound images of IUP and CSP between 5-10 weeks of gestation. A total of 242 ultrasound images were analyzed: 185 cases of normal IUPs (including 128 in anteverted uteri, 31 in retroverted uteri, and 26 IUPs with history of cesarean delivery) and 57 cases of CSPs diagnosed from 2004 through 2015 in a single institution. The following measurements were made for each case: distance from the external cervical os to the uterine fundus, the midpoint axis of the uterus, the distance from the external cervical os to the center of gestational sacs, and the distance from the external cervical os to the most distant edge of the gestational sacs from the cervix.
RESULTS: The location of the center of the gestational sac relative to the midpoint axis of the uterus between 5-10 weeks of gestation differentiated between IUP and CSP (mean 17.8 vs -10.6 mm, respectively, P = .0001), indicating that most CSPs are located proximally to the midpoint axis of the uterus whereas most normal IUPs are located distally from the midpoint of the uterus. Using location of the center of the gestational sac as a marker of CSPs between 5-10 weeks of gestation yielded the following characteristics of diagnostic accuracy: sensitivity 93.0% and specificity 98.9%. The likelihood ratio of the positive test was 84.5. The likelihood ratio of the negative test was 0.07.
CONCLUSION: The location of the center of the gestational sac relative to the midpoint axis of the uterus can be used as an easy method for sonographic differentiation of IUP and CSP between 5-10 weeks of gestation. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Keywords:  cesarean scar pregnancy; differential diagnosis; intrauterine pregnancy; ultrasonography; ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26899908     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  9 in total

1.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in uterine artery embolization treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.

Authors:  Dongmei Liu; Xiaoning Gu; Fang Liu; Fuwen Shi; Min Yang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.671

2.  Differential Diagnosis of Cesarean Scar Pregnancies and Other Pregnancies Implanted in the Lower Uterus by Ultrasound Parameters.

Authors:  Kangning Li; Qing Dai
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Evaluation of the necessity of laparoscopic repair of a uterine scar defect for cesarean scar pregnancy.

Authors:  Jiangdong Xiang; Yannan Cao; Lina Zhou; Haiying Yang; Sufang Wu; Linxia Li
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.671

4.  Definition and sonographic reporting system for Cesarean scar pregnancy in early gestation: modified Delphi method.

Authors:  I P M Jordans; C Verberkt; R A De Leeuw; C M Bilardo; T Van Den Bosch; T Bourne; H A M Brölmann; M Dueholm; W J K Hehenkamp; N Jastrow; D Jurkovic; A Kaelin Agten; R Mashiach; O Naji; E Pajkrt; D Timmerman; O Vikhareva; L F Van Der Voet; J A F Huirne
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 8.678

5.  Cesarean scar pregnancy with expectant management.

Authors:  Liye Fu; Yingchun Luo; Jinbai Huang
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 1.697

6.  A stepwise approach to robotic assisted excision of a cesarean scar pregnancy.

Authors:  Payam Katebi Kashi; Katherine L Dengler; Eva K Welch; Angela DiCarlo-Meacham; Araba A Jackson; G Scott Rose
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2021-02-19

7.  Risk factors and consequences of undiagnosed cesarean scar pregnancy: a cohort study in China.

Authors:  Ri-Hua Xie; Xiaoyan Guo; Meng Li; Yan Liao; Laura Gaudet; Mark Walker; Huizhong Lei; Shi Wu Wen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy: Diagnosis With Ultrasound.

Authors:  Taryn Hoffman; Judy Lin
Journal:  Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med       Date:  2020-01-15

9.  Combination of medical and surgical management in successful treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy: a case report series.

Authors:  Anda Pristavu; Angela Vinturache; Elena Mihalceanu; Radu Pintilie; Mircea Onofriescu; Demetra Socolov
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 3.007

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.