Wenwu He1, Xuefeng Leng1, Kangning Wang1, Tiaoqin Mao2, Lin Peng1, Qiang Fang1, Wenguang Xiao1, Yongtao Han1. 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China. 2. School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) can vary, but there is still no biomarker that can identify the benefiting population. Therefore, biomarkers to predict the outcome of nCRT are needed, as well as elucidation of the mechanism of resistance therapy. We investigated differences of genomic characteristics between patients with a pathologic complete response (pCR) and those with little or no response (pathologic stable disease: pSD) before and after nCRT. METHODS: Fourteen subjects with locally advanced ESCC (7 cases of pCR and 7 of pSD) who received nCRT before undergoing esophagectomy were enrolled. An analysis of whole-exome sequencing (WES) data from 27 ESCC tissue samples obtained from the subjects pre and post nCRT was performed. RESULTS: The number of pretherapy samples displaying loss of chromosome 19p13.11 was higher in the pCR group than in the pSD group (5/6) (P=0.0291, Fisher's exact test). Gain of 19q13.31 was observed significantly more often in the samples obtained following nCRT (5/14). KMT2A missense mutation was found more frequently in the pSD group's pre-nCRT samples than in those of the pCR group (3/6), and following nCRT, new genes such as NF1, KMT2D, NOTCH2, and NIPBL were detected new variations. C/G>G/C (P=0.003) and C/G>A/T (P=0.002) transitions were statistically significantly reduced in every patient after nCRT, with similar observations made in both groups (pCR group: C/G>G/C, P=0.027; C/G>A/T, P=0.004; and pSD group: C/G>G/C, P=0.032; C/G>A/T, P=0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Biomarkers to predict pCR might include 19p13.11 copy number loss and KMT2A missense mutation. Further validation in a prospective study of a larger sample is required. 2020 Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: The response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) can vary, but there is still no biomarker that can identify the benefiting population. Therefore, biomarkers to predict the outcome of nCRT are needed, as well as elucidation of the mechanism of resistance therapy. We investigated differences of genomic characteristics between patients with a pathologic complete response (pCR) and those with little or no response (pathologic stable disease: pSD) before and after nCRT. METHODS: Fourteen subjects with locally advanced ESCC (7 cases of pCR and 7 of pSD) who received nCRT before undergoing esophagectomy were enrolled. An analysis of whole-exome sequencing (WES) data from 27 ESCC tissue samples obtained from the subjects pre and post nCRT was performed. RESULTS: The number of pretherapy samples displaying loss of chromosome 19p13.11 was higher in the pCR group than in the pSD group (5/6) (P=0.0291, Fisher's exact test). Gain of 19q13.31 was observed significantly more often in the samples obtained following nCRT (5/14). KMT2A missense mutation was found more frequently in the pSD group's pre-nCRT samples than in those of the pCR group (3/6), and following nCRT, new genes such as NF1, KMT2D, NOTCH2, and NIPBL were detected new variations. C/G>G/C (P=0.003) and C/G>A/T (P=0.002) transitions were statistically significantly reduced in every patient after nCRT, with similar observations made in both groups (pCR group: C/G>G/C, P=0.027; C/G>A/T, P=0.004; and pSD group: C/G>G/C, P=0.032; C/G>A/T, P=0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Biomarkers to predict pCR might include 19p13.11 copy number loss and KMT2A missense mutation. Further validation in a prospective study of a larger sample is required. 2020 Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. All rights reserved.
Authors: P van Hagen; M C C M Hulshof; J J B van Lanschot; E W Steyerberg; M I van Berge Henegouwen; B P L Wijnhoven; D J Richel; G A P Nieuwenhuijzen; G A P Hospers; J J Bonenkamp; M A Cuesta; R J B Blaisse; O R C Busch; F J W ten Kate; G-J Creemers; C J A Punt; J T M Plukker; H M W Verheul; E J Spillenaar Bilgen; H van Dekken; M J C van der Sangen; T Rozema; K Biermann; J C Beukema; A H M Piet; C M van Rij; J G Reinders; H W Tilanus; A van der Gaast Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-05-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Thomas W Rice; Hemant Ishwaran; Mark K Ferguson; Eugene H Blackstone; Peter Goldstraw Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2016-10-31 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Joel Shapiro; J Jan B van Lanschot; Maarten C C M Hulshof; Pieter van Hagen; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Bas P L Wijnhoven; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen; Geke A P Hospers; Johannes J Bonenkamp; Miguel A Cuesta; Reinoud J B Blaisse; Olivier R C Busch; Fiebo J W Ten Kate; Geert-Jan M Creemers; Cornelis J A Punt; John Th M Plukker; Henk M W Verheul; Ernst J Spillenaar Bilgen; Herman van Dekken; Maurice J C van der Sangen; Tom Rozema; Katharina Biermann; Jannet C Beukema; Anna H M Piet; Caroline M van Rij; Janny G Reinders; Hugo W Tilanus; Ewout W Steyerberg; Ate van der Gaast Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2015-08-05 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 508.702