BACKGROUND: The global crisis situation caused by SARS-CoV-2 has created an explosive demand for ventilators, which cannot be met even in developed countries. Designing a simple and inexpensive device with the ability to increase the number of patients that can be connected to existing ventilators would have a major impact on the number of lives that could be saved. We conducted a study to determine whether two pigs with significant differences in size and weight could be ventilated simultaneously using a single ventilator connected to a new medical device called DuplicARⓇ. METHODS: Six pigs (median weight 12 kg, range 9-25 kg) were connected in pairs to a single ventilator using the new device for 6 hours. Both the ventilator and the device were manipulated throughout the experiment according to the needs of each animal. Tidal volume and positive end-expiratory pressure were individually controlled with the device. Primary and secondary outcome variables were defined to assess ventilation and hemodynamics in all animals throughout the experiment. RESULTS: Median difference in weight between the animals of each pair was 67% (range: 11-108). All animals could be successfully oxygenated and ventilated for 6 hours through manipulation of the ventilator and the DuplicARⓇ device, despite significant discrepancies in body size and weight. Mean PaCO2 in arterial blood was 42.1 ± 4.4 mmHg, mean PaO2 was 162.8 ± 46.8 mmHg, and mean oxygen saturation was 98 ± 1.3%. End-tidal CO2 values showed no statistically significant difference among subjects of each pair. Mean difference in arterial PaCO2 measured at the same time in both animals of each pair was 4.8 ± 3 mmHg, reflecting the ability of the device to ventilate each animal according to its particular requirements. Independent management of PEEP was achieved by manipulation of the device controllers. CONCLUSION: It is possible to ventilate two lung-healthy animals with a single ventilator according to each one's needs through manipulation of both the ventilator and the DuplicARⓇ device. This gives this device the potential to expand local ventilators surge capacity during disasters or pandemics until emergency supplies can be delivered from central stockpiles.
BACKGROUND: The global crisis situation caused by SARS-CoV-2 has created an explosive demand for ventilators, which cannot be met even in developed countries. Designing a simple and inexpensive device with the ability to increase the number of patients that can be connected to existing ventilators would have a major impact on the number of lives that could be saved. We conducted a study to determine whether two pigs with significant differences in size and weight could be ventilated simultaneously using a single ventilator connected to a new medical device called DuplicARⓇ. METHODS: Six pigs (median weight 12 kg, range 9-25 kg) were connected in pairs to a single ventilator using the new device for 6 hours. Both the ventilator and the device were manipulated throughout the experiment according to the needs of each animal. Tidal volume and positive end-expiratory pressure were individually controlled with the device. Primary and secondary outcome variables were defined to assess ventilation and hemodynamics in all animals throughout the experiment. RESULTS: Median difference in weight between the animals of each pair was 67% (range: 11-108). All animals could be successfully oxygenated and ventilated for 6 hours through manipulation of the ventilator and the DuplicARⓇ device, despite significant discrepancies in body size and weight. Mean PaCO2 in arterial blood was 42.1 ± 4.4 mmHg, mean PaO2 was 162.8 ± 46.8 mmHg, and mean oxygen saturation was 98 ± 1.3%. End-tidal CO2 values showed no statistically significant difference among subjects of each pair. Mean difference in arterial PaCO2 measured at the same time in both animals of each pair was 4.8 ± 3 mmHg, reflecting the ability of the device to ventilate each animal according to its particular requirements. Independent management of PEEP was achieved by manipulation of the device controllers. CONCLUSION: It is possible to ventilate two lung-healthy animals with a single ventilator according to each one's needs through manipulation of both the ventilator and the DuplicARⓇ device. This gives this device the potential to expand local ventilators surge capacity during disasters or pandemics until emergency supplies can be delivered from central stockpiles.
Authors: Lorenzo Paladino; Mark Silverberg; Jean G Charchaflieh; Julie K Eason; Brian J Wright; Nicholas Palamidessi; Bonnie Arquilla; Richard Sinert; Seth Manoach Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2007-12-31 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Jacob Herrmann; Andrea Fonseca da Cruz; Monica L Hawley; Richard D Branson; David W Kaczka Journal: Respir Care Date: 2020-05-06 Impact factor: 2.258
Authors: Jeremy R Beitler; Aaron M Mittel; Richard Kallet; Robert Kacmarek; Dean Hess; Richard Branson; Murray Olson; Ivan Garcia; Barbara Powell; David S Wang; Jonathan Hastie; Oliver Panzer; Daniel Brodie; Laureen L Hill; B Taylor Thompson Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2020-08-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Ryan C Maves; James Downar; Jeffrey R Dichter; John L Hick; Asha Devereaux; James A Geiling; Niranjan Kissoon; Nathaniel Hupert; Alexander S Niven; Mary A King; Lewis L Rubinson; Dan Hanfling; James G Hodge; Mary Faith Marshall; Katherine Fischkoff; Laura E Evans; Mark R Tonelli; Randy S Wax; Gilbert Seda; John S Parrish; Robert D Truog; Charles L Sprung; Michael D Christian Journal: Chest Date: 2020-04-11 Impact factor: 9.410