Karl Charlton1, Matthew Limmer2, Hayley Moore2. 1. North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust: ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9601-1083. 2. North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of intravenous versus oral paracetamol (acetaminophen) in the management of acute pain in the out-of-hospital setting. METHODS: We extracted ambulance electronic patient care records for all patients who received 1 g intravenous paracetamol throughout January 2019, and case matched these by sex and age with consecutive patients who received 1 g oral paracetamol over the same time period. Eligible for inclusion were all patients aged ≥ 18 who received 1 g paracetamol for acute pain and who were transported to the emergency department (ED). The primary outcome was the mean reduction in pain score using the numeric rating scale (NRS), with a reduction of 2 or more accepted as clinically significant. RESULTS: 80 care records were eligible for analysis; 40 patients received intravenous and 40 patients received oral paracetamol. The mean age of both groups was 54 years (± 3 years) and 67.5% (n = 54) were female. Patients receiving intravenous paracetamol had a clinically significant mean (SD) improved pain score compared to those receiving oral paracetamol, 2.02 (1.64) versus 0.75 (1.76), respectively [p = 0.0013]. 13/40 (32.5%) patients who received intravenous paracetamol saw an improved pain score of ≥ 2 compared to 8/40 (20%) who received oral paracetamol. No patients received additional analgesia or reported any adverse symptoms. Abdominal pain, infection and trauma were the most common causes of pain in both groups. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that intravenous paracetamol is more effective than oral paracetamol when managing acute pain in the out-of-hospital setting. Our findings support further investigation of the role of paracetamol in paramedic practice using more robust methods.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of intravenous versus oral paracetamol (acetaminophen) in the management of acute pain in the out-of-hospital setting. METHODS: We extracted ambulance electronic patient care records for all patients who received 1 g intravenous paracetamol throughout January 2019, and case matched these by sex and age with consecutive patients who received 1 g oral paracetamol over the same time period. Eligible for inclusion were all patients aged ≥ 18 who received 1 g paracetamol for acute pain and who were transported to the emergency department (ED). The primary outcome was the mean reduction in pain score using the numeric rating scale (NRS), with a reduction of 2 or more accepted as clinically significant. RESULTS: 80 care records were eligible for analysis; 40 patients received intravenous and 40 patients received oral paracetamol. The mean age of both groups was 54 years (± 3 years) and 67.5% (n = 54) were female. Patients receiving intravenous paracetamol had a clinically significant mean (SD) improved pain score compared to those receiving oral paracetamol, 2.02 (1.64) versus 0.75 (1.76), respectively [p = 0.0013]. 13/40 (32.5%) patients who received intravenous paracetamol saw an improved pain score of ≥ 2 compared to 8/40 (20%) who received oral paracetamol. No patients received additional analgesia or reported any adverse symptoms. Abdominal pain, infection and trauma were the most common causes of pain in both groups. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that intravenous paracetamol is more effective than oral paracetamol when managing acute pain in the out-of-hospital setting. Our findings support further investigation of the role of paracetamol in paramedic practice using more robust methods.
Authors: Frank-Peter Stephan; Christian H Nickel; Jaqueline S Martin; Daniela Grether; Karen Delport-Lehnen; Roland Bingisser Journal: Swiss Med Wkly Date: 2010-06-12 Impact factor: 2.193
Authors: Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Matthias Egger; Stuart J Pocock; Peter C Gøtzsche; Jan P Vandenbroucke Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2007-10-16 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Sivera A A Berben; Lisette Schoonhoven; Tineke H J M Meijs; Arie B van Vugt; Pierre M van Grunsven Journal: Clin J Pain Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 3.442
Authors: Samuel A McLean; Robert M Domeier; Heather K DeVore; Elizabeth M Hill; Ronald F Maio; Shirley M Frederiksen Journal: Prehosp Emerg Care Date: 2004 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: Ryan N Hansen; An T Pham; Elaine A Boing; Belinda Lovelace; George J Wan; Richard D Urman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-09-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Alexander J Bollinger; Paul D Butler; Matthew S Nies; Debra L Sietsema; Clifford B Jones; Terrence J Endres Journal: Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil Date: 2015-09