OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the correlation between dual-energy computed tomography (DECT)-based iodine quantitation and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging for response evaluation of lung cancers to treatment. METHODS: In this prospective study, a total of 32 pairs of DECT and F-FDG PET/CT imaging acquired consecutively from 13 patients with primary or metastatic lung cancers receiving either radiotherapy alone or chemoradiotherapy were analyzed. Imaging examinations were performed before, immediately, and no later than 6 months after treatment for response evaluation. Iodine-related parameters including the total iodine uptake (TIU) and vital volume (VIV) from DECT and metabolic metrics such as the standardized uptake value normalized to lean body mass (SULpeak), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and the total lesion glycolysis (TLG) from F-FDG-PET/CT were generated and measured by semiautomatic approaches. Dual-energy CT and PET/CT metrics were calculated and followed up with comparison with response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST). RESULTS: Analysis of pretreatment imaging data revealed a strong correlation between DECT metrics (RECIST, TIU, and VIV) and F-FDG PET/CT metrics (MTV, TLG) with coefficients of R ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 (P < 0.01). With the delivery of treatment, all measured DECT and PET/CT metrics significantly decreased whereas the descending amplitude in RECIST was significantly smaller than that of the remaining parameters (P < 0.05). During follow-up examinations, both metrics followed a similar changing pattern. Overall, strong consistency was found between RECIST, TIU, VIV and SULpeak, MTV, TLG (R covers 0.78-0.96, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Semiautomatic iodine-related quantitation in DECT correlated well with metabolism-based measurements in F-FDG PET/CT, suggesting that DECT-based iodine quantitation might be a feasible substitute for assessment of lung cancer response to chemoradiotherapy/radiotherapy with comparison with F-FDG PET/CT.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the correlation between dual-energy computed tomography (DECT)-based iodine quantitation and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging for response evaluation of lung cancers to treatment. METHODS: In this prospective study, a total of 32 pairs of DECT and F-FDG PET/CT imaging acquired consecutively from 13 patients with primary or metastatic lung cancers receiving either radiotherapy alone or chemoradiotherapy were analyzed. Imaging examinations were performed before, immediately, and no later than 6 months after treatment for response evaluation. Iodine-related parameters including the total iodine uptake (TIU) and vital volume (VIV) from DECT and metabolic metrics such as the standardized uptake value normalized to lean body mass (SULpeak), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and the total lesion glycolysis (TLG) from F-FDG-PET/CT were generated and measured by semiautomatic approaches. Dual-energy CT and PET/CT metrics were calculated and followed up with comparison with response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST). RESULTS: Analysis of pretreatment imaging data revealed a strong correlation between DECT metrics (RECIST, TIU, and VIV) and F-FDG PET/CT metrics (MTV, TLG) with coefficients of R ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 (P < 0.01). With the delivery of treatment, all measured DECT and PET/CT metrics significantly decreased whereas the descending amplitude in RECIST was significantly smaller than that of the remaining parameters (P < 0.05). During follow-up examinations, both metrics followed a similar changing pattern. Overall, strong consistency was found between RECIST, TIU, VIV and SULpeak, MTV, TLG (R covers 0.78-0.96, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Semiautomatic iodine-related quantitation in DECT correlated well with metabolism-based measurements in F-FDG PET/CT, suggesting that DECT-based iodine quantitation might be a feasible substitute for assessment of lung cancer response to chemoradiotherapy/radiotherapy with comparison with F-FDG PET/CT.
Authors: Cherry Kim; Wooil Kim; Sung Joon Park; Young Hen Lee; Sung Ho Hwang; Hwan Seok Yong; Yu Whan Oh; Eun Young Kang; Ki Yeol Lee Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 3.500