Literature DB >> 33455035

Advances in quantitative high-throughput phosphoproteomics with sample multiplexing.

Joao A Paulo1, Devin K Schweppe2.   

Abstract

Eukaryotic protein phosphorylation modulates nearly every major biological process. Phosphorylation regulates protein activity, mediates cellular signal transduction, and manipulates cellular structure. Consequently, the dysregulation of kinase and phosphatase pathways has been linked to a multitude of diseases. Mass spectrometry-based proteomic techniques are increasingly used for the global interrogation of perturbations in phosphorylation-based cellular signaling. Strategies for studying phosphoproteomes require high-specificity enrichment, sensitive detection, and accurate localization of phosphorylation sites with advanced LC-MS/MS techniques and downstream informatics. Sample multiplexing with isobaric tags has also been integral to recent advancements in throughput and sensitivity for phosphoproteomic studies. Each of these facets of phosphoproteomics analysis present distinct challenges and thus opportunities for improvement and innovation. Here, we review current methodologies, explore persistent challenges, and discuss the outlook for isobaric tag-based quantitative phosphoproteomic analysis.
© 2021 Wiley-VCH GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  automation; high-throughput; tandem-mass tag

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33455035      PMCID: PMC8209658          DOI: 10.1002/pmic.202000140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteomics        ISSN: 1615-9853            Impact factor:   3.984


  151 in total

Review 1.  Tandem mass spectrometry strategies for phosphoproteome analysis.

Authors:  Amanda M Palumbo; Scott A Smith; Christine L Kalcic; Marcos Dantus; Paul M Stemmer; Gavin E Reid
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 10.946

2.  Histidine Phosphorylation Site Identification by ESI-MS.

Authors:  Albert Sickmann; Helmut E Meyer
Journal:  CSH Protoc       Date:  2007-09-01

3.  A scoring model for phosphopeptide site localization and its impact on the question of whether to use MSA.

Authors:  Juliana de S da G Fischer; Marlon D M Dos Santos; Fabricio K Marchini; Valmir C Barbosa; Paulo C Carvalho; Nilson I T Zanchin
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  Accurate Quantitative Proteomic Analyses Using Metabolic Labeling and High Field Asymmetric Waveform Ion Mobility Spectrometry (FAIMS).

Authors:  Sibylle Pfammatter; Eric Bonneil; Francis P McManus; Pierre Thibault
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 4.466

5.  Automated phosphopeptide identification using multiple MS/MS fragmentation modes.

Authors:  Mathias Vandenbogaert; Véronique Hourdel; Olivia Jardin-Mathé; Jean Bigeard; Ludovic Bonhomme; Véronique Legros; Heribert Hirt; Benno Schwikowski; Delphine Pflieger
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 6.  pHisphorylation: the emergence of histidine phosphorylation as a reversible regulatory modification.

Authors:  Stephen Rush Fuhs; Tony Hunter
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 8.382

7.  Web-Based Search Tool for Visualizing Instrument Performance Using the Triple Knockout (TKO) Proteome Standard.

Authors:  Jeremy P Gygi; Qing Yu; Jose Navarrete-Perea; Ramin Rad; Steven P Gygi; Joao A Paulo
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 4.466

8.  In vivo SILAC-based proteomics reveals phosphoproteome changes during mouse skin carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Sara Zanivan; Alexander Meves; Kristina Behrendt; Erwin M Schoof; Lisa J Neilson; Jürgen Cox; Hao R Tang; Gabriela Kalna; Janine H van Ree; Jan M van Deursen; Carol S Trempus; Laura M Machesky; Rune Linding; Sara A Wickström; Reinhard Fässler; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 9.423

9.  193 nm Ultraviolet Photodissociation Mass Spectrometry for Phosphopeptide Characterization in the Positive and Negative Ion Modes.

Authors:  Michelle R Robinson; Juliana M Taliaferro; Kevin N Dalby; Jennifer S Brodbelt
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 4.466

10.  MSFragger: ultrafast and comprehensive peptide identification in mass spectrometry-based proteomics.

Authors:  Andy T Kong; Felipe V Leprevost; Dmitry M Avtonomov; Dattatreya Mellacheruvu; Alexey I Nesvizhskii
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 28.547

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Multiplex protein analysis for the study of glaucoma.

Authors:  Gülgün Tezel
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 3.940

Review 2.  Pathological implication of protein post-translational modifications in cancer.

Authors:  Sheng Pan; Ru Chen
Journal:  Mol Aspects Med       Date:  2022-04-07

3.  Fe3+-NTA magnetic beads as an alternative to spin column-based phosphopeptide enrichment.

Authors:  Xinyue Liu; Valentina Rossio; Sanjukta Guha Thakurta; Amarjeet Flora; Leigh Foster; Ryan D Bomgarden; Steven P Gygi; Joao A Paulo
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 3.855

Review 4.  Insights Into the Biogenesis and Emerging Functions of Lipid Droplets From Unbiased Molecular Profiling Approaches.

Authors:  Miguel Sánchez-Álvarez; Miguel Ángel Del Pozo; Marta Bosch; Albert Pol
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-06-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.