Literature DB >> 25623781

A scoring model for phosphopeptide site localization and its impact on the question of whether to use MSA.

Juliana de S da G Fischer1, Marlon D M Dos Santos1, Fabricio K Marchini2, Valmir C Barbosa3, Paulo C Carvalho4, Nilson I T Zanchin5.   

Abstract

The production of structurally significant product ions during the dissociation of phosphopeptides is a key to the successful determination of phosphorylation sites. These diagnostic ions can be generated using the widely adopted MS/MS approach, MS3 (Data Dependent Neutral Loss - DDNL), or by multistage activation (MSA). The main purpose of this work is to introduce a false-localization rate (FLR) probabilistic model to enable unbiased phosphoproteomics studies. Briefly, our algorithm infers a probabilistic function from the distribution of the identified phosphopeptides' XCorr Delta scores (XD-Scores) in the current experiment. Our module infers p-values by relying on Gaussian mixture models and a logistic function. We demonstrate the usefulness of our probabilistic model by revisiting the "to MSA, or not to MSA" dilemma. For this, we use human leukemia-derived cells (K562) as a study model and enriched for phosphopeptides using the hydroxyapatite (HAP) chromatography. The aliquots were analyzed with and without MSA on an Orbitrap-XL. Our XD-Scoring analysis revealed that the MS/MS approach provides more identifications because of its faster scan rate, but that for the same given scan rate higher-confidence spectra can be achieved with MSA. Our software is integrated into the PatternLab for proteomics freely available for academic community at http://www.patternlabforproteomics.org. Biological significance Assigning statistical confidence to phosphorylation sites is necessary for proper phosphoproteomic assessment. Here we present a rigorous statistical model, based on Gaussian mixture models and a logistic function, which overcomes shortcomings of previous tools. The algorithm described herein is made readily available to the scientific community by integrating it into the widely adopted PatternLab for proteomics. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Computational Proteomics.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HAP chromatography; Multistage activation (MSA); Phosphopeptide enrichment; Phosphoproteomics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25623781     DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2015.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteomics        ISSN: 1874-3919            Impact factor:   4.044


  5 in total

Review 1.  Strategies for mass spectrometry-based phosphoproteomics using isobaric tagging.

Authors:  Xinyue Liu; Rose Fields; Devin K Schweppe; Joao A Paulo
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 3.940

2.  Integrated analysis of shotgun proteomic data with PatternLab for proteomics 4.0.

Authors:  Paulo C Carvalho; Diogo B Lima; Felipe V Leprevost; Marlon D M Santos; Juliana S G Fischer; Priscila F Aquino; James J Moresco; John R Yates; Valmir C Barbosa
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 3.  Advances in quantitative high-throughput phosphoproteomics with sample multiplexing.

Authors:  Joao A Paulo; Devin K Schweppe
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 3.984

4.  Integrative proteomic and glycoproteomic profiling of Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture filtrate.

Authors:  Paula Tucci; Madelón Portela; Carlos Rivas Chetto; Gualberto González-Sapienza; Mónica Marín
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Histidine kinases and the missing phosphoproteome from prokaryotes to eukaryotes.

Authors:  Kevin Adam; Tony Hunter
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 5.662

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.