Literature DB >> 33454913

NABat: A top-down, bottom-up solution to collaborative continental-scale monitoring.

Brian E Reichert1, Mylea Bayless2, Tina L Cheng2, Jeremy T H Coleman3, Charles M Francis4, Winifred F Frick2,5, Benjamin S Gotthold6, Kathryn M Irvine7, Cori Lausen8, Han Li9, Susan C Loeb10, Jonathan D Reichard3, Thomas J Rodhouse11, Jordi L Segers12, Jeremy L Siemers13, Wayne E Thogmartin14, Theodore J Weller15.   

Abstract

Collaborative monitoring over broad scales and levels of ecological organization can inform conservation efforts necessary to address the contemporary biodiversity crisis. An important challenge to collaborative monitoring is motivating local engagement with enough buy-in from stakeholders while providing adequate top-down direction for scientific rigor, quality control, and coordination. Collaborative monitoring must reconcile this inherent tension between top-down control and bottom-up engagement. Highly mobile and cryptic taxa, such as bats, present a particularly acute challenge. Given their scale of movement, complex life histories, and rapidly expanding threats, understanding population trends of bats requires coordinated broad-scale collaborative monitoring. The North American Bat Monitoring Program (NABat) reconciles top-down, bottom-up tension with a hierarchical master sample survey design, integrated data analysis, dynamic data curation, regional monitoring hubs, and knowledge delivery through web-based infrastructure. NABat supports collaborative monitoring across spatial and organizational scales and the full annual lifecycle of bats.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bats; Collaborative monitoring; Master sample; NABat; Sample design; White-nose syndrome

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33454913      PMCID: PMC7982360          DOI: 10.1007/s13280-020-01411-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ambio        ISSN: 0044-7447            Impact factor:   5.129


  20 in total

Review 1.  Monitoring for conservation.

Authors:  James D Nichols; Byron K Williams
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  A Bayesian state-space formulation of dynamic occupancy models.

Authors:  J Andrew Royle; Marc Kéry
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.499

3.  Monitoring the condition of natural resources in US national parks.

Authors:  S G Fancy; J E Gross; S L Carter
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 4.  Ecosystem services provided by bats.

Authors:  Thomas H Kunz; Elizabeth Braun de Torrez; Dana Bauer; Tatyana Lobova; Theodore H Fleming
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Conservation. Economic importance of bats in agriculture.

Authors:  Justin G Boyles; Paul M Cryan; Gary F McCracken; Thomas H Kunz
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Occupancy modeling species-environment relationships with non-ignorable survey designs.

Authors:  Kathryn M Irvine; Thomas J Rodhouse; Wilson J Wright; Anthony R Olsen
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 4.657

7.  A goodness-of-fit test for occupancy models with correlated within-season revisits.

Authors:  Wilson J Wright; Kathryn M Irvine; Thomas J Rodhouse
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Developing and enhancing biodiversity monitoring programmes: a collaborative assessment of priorities.

Authors:  Michael J O Pocock; Stuart E Newson; Ian G Henderson; Jodey Peyton; William J Sutherland; David G Noble; Stuart G Ball; Björn C Beckmann; Jeremy Biggs; Tom Brereton; David J Bullock; Stephen T Buckland; Mike Edwards; Mark A Eaton; Martin C Harvey; Mark O Hill; Martin Horlock; David S Hubble; Angela M Julian; Edward C Mackey; Darren J Mann; Matthew J Marshall; Jolyon M Medlock; Elaine M O'Mahony; Marina Pacheco; Keith Porter; Steve Prentice; Deborah A Procter; Helen E Roy; Sue E Southway; Chris R Shortall; Alan J A Stewart; David E Wembridge; Mark A Wright; David B Roy
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 6.528

9.  Variation in regional and landscape effects on occupancy of temperate bats in the southeastern U.S.

Authors:  Benjamin D Neece; Susan C Loeb; David S Jachowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Evidence of region-wide bat population decline from long-term monitoring and Bayesian occupancy models with empirically informed priors.

Authors:  Thomas J Rodhouse; Rogelio M Rodriguez; Katharine M Banner; Patricia C Ormsbee; Jenny Barnett; Kathryn M Irvine
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 2.912

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Acoustic and Genetic Data Can Reduce Uncertainty Regarding Populations of Migratory Tree-Roosting Bats Impacted by Wind Energy.

Authors:  Amanda M Hale; Cris D Hein; Bethany R Straw
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 2.  Estimating the movements of terrestrial animal populations using broad-scale occurrence data.

Authors:  Sarah R Supp; Gil Bohrer; John Fieberg; Frank A La Sorte
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 3.600

3.  Predator-Prey Relationship between Urban Bats and Insects Impacted by Both Artificial Light at Night and Spatial Clutter.

Authors:  Han Li; Kenneth T Wilkins
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-27

4.  Population dynamics of little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus) at summer roosts: Apparent survival, fidelity, abundance, and the influence of winter conditions.

Authors:  Robert A Schorr; Jeremy L Siemers
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 2.912

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.