J C Balt1, M N Klaver2, B K Mahmoodi2, V F van Dijk2, M C E F Wijffels2, L V A Boersma2. 1. St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435, CM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands. j.balt@antoniusziekenhuis.nl. 2. St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435, CM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Ablation of atypical atrial flutter (AAFL) can be challenging. High-density (HD) mapping of ablation targets may potentially increase procedural success and freedom from recurrent AAFL. The objective of the present study was to explore whether employing HD mapping leads to a more favorable outcome in ablation of AAFL. METHODS: We compared baseline and procedural characteristics, procedural success, safety and outcome of mapping and ablation of atypical flutter in three groups. (1) HD Grid catheter + the high-density electroanatomical mapping (EAM) system EnSite Precision; (2) standard 10-pole circular mapping catheter (CMC) + EnSite Precision; (3) CMC + the low-density EnSite Velocity EAM. Voltage and propagation maps were constructed. RESULTS: Mapping of 142 AAFL in 82 patients was performed. Acute ablation success was 78%, 68%, and 51% in groups 1, 2, and 3 (p = 0.037 between group 1 and 3, non-significant between groups otherwise). Moreover, 8%, 27%, and 36% of flutters were unmappable in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p < 0.05 between group 1 and both groups 2 and 3). AAFL recurrence at 1-year FU was 26%, 36%, and 62% in groups 1, 2, and 3 (p = 0.007 between groups 1 and 3, p = 0.05 between groups 2 and 3). AAFL-free survival was significantly higher in patients mapped with Precision than with Velocity (p = 0.011). No strokes or mortality occurred within 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: Acute procedural success of ablation of atypical atrial flutter is higher and the number of unmappable flutters is lower using the HD Grid mapping catheter in combination with the high-density EnSite Precision system, as compared to a decapolar circular mapping catheter and the low-density EnSite Velocity EAM system. This may lead to increased freedom from recurrent AAFL at 1 year. HD mapping is safe.
PURPOSE: Ablation of atypical atrial flutter (AAFL) can be challenging. High-density (HD) mapping of ablation targets may potentially increase procedural success and freedom from recurrent AAFL. The objective of the present study was to explore whether employing HD mapping leads to a more favorable outcome in ablation of AAFL. METHODS: We compared baseline and procedural characteristics, procedural success, safety and outcome of mapping and ablation of atypical flutter in three groups. (1) HD Grid catheter + the high-density electroanatomical mapping (EAM) system EnSite Precision; (2) standard 10-pole circular mapping catheter (CMC) + EnSite Precision; (3) CMC + the low-density EnSite Velocity EAM. Voltage and propagation maps were constructed. RESULTS: Mapping of 142 AAFL in 82 patients was performed. Acute ablation success was 78%, 68%, and 51% in groups 1, 2, and 3 (p = 0.037 between group 1 and 3, non-significant between groups otherwise). Moreover, 8%, 27%, and 36% of flutters were unmappable in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p < 0.05 between group 1 and both groups 2 and 3). AAFL recurrence at 1-year FU was 26%, 36%, and 62% in groups 1, 2, and 3 (p = 0.007 between groups 1 and 3, p = 0.05 between groups 2 and 3). AAFL-free survival was significantly higher in patients mapped with Precision than with Velocity (p = 0.011). No strokes or mortality occurred within 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: Acute procedural success of ablation of atypical atrial flutter is higher and the number of unmappable flutters is lower using the HD Grid mapping catheter in combination with the high-density EnSite Precision system, as compared to a decapolar circular mapping catheter and the low-density EnSite Velocity EAM system. This may lead to increased freedom from recurrent AAFL at 1 year. HD mapping is safe.
Authors: Richard L Page; José A Joglar; Mary A Caldwell; Hugh Calkins; Jamie B Conti; Barbara J Deal; N A Mark Estes; Michael E Field; Zachary D Goldberger; Stephen C Hammill; Julia H Indik; Bruce D Lindsay; Brian Olshansky; Andrea M Russo; Win-Kuang Shen; Cynthia M Tracy; Sana M Al-Khatib Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2015-09-24 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Emile G Daoud; Raul Weiss; Ralph Augostini; John D Hummel; Steven J Kalbfleisch; John M Van Deren; Georgia Dawson; Kathy Bowman Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2006-02
Authors: Hugh Calkins; Gerhard Hindricks; Riccardo Cappato; Young-Hoon Kim; Eduardo B Saad; Luis Aguinaga; Joseph G Akar; Vinay Badhwar; Josep Brugada; John Camm; Peng-Sheng Chen; Shih-Ann Chen; Mina K Chung; Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Anne B Curtis; D Wyn Davies; John D Day; André d'Avila; N M S Natasja de Groot; Luigi Di Biase; Mattias Duytschaever; James R Edgerton; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Patrick T Ellinor; Sabine Ernst; Guilherme Fenelon; Edward P Gerstenfeld; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Robert H Helm; Elaine Hylek; Warren M Jackman; Jose Jalife; Jonathan M Kalman; Josef Kautzner; Hans Kottkamp; Karl Heinz Kuck; Koichiro Kumagai; Richard Lee; Thorsten Lewalter; Bruce D Lindsay; Laurent Macle; Moussa Mansour; Francis E Marchlinski; Gregory F Michaud; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Andrea Natale; Stanley Nattel; Ken Okumura; Douglas Packer; Evgeny Pokushalov; Matthew R Reynolds; Prashanthan Sanders; Mauricio Scanavacca; Richard Schilling; Claudio Tondo; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; Atul Verma; David J Wilber; Teiichi Yamane Journal: J Arrhythm Date: 2017-09-15
Authors: Kristina Wasmer; Gerold Mönnig; Alex Bittner; Dirk Dechering; Stephan Zellerhoff; Peter Milberg; Julia Köbe; Lars Eckardt Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2012-06-06 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: H Thomas McElderry; David C McGiffin; Vance J Plumb; Kumaraswamy Nanthakumar; Andrew E Epstein; Takumi Yamada; G Neal Kay Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-12-24 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Sanders Chae; Hakan Oral; Eric Good; Sujoya Dey; Alan Wimmer; Thomas Crawford; Darryl Wells; Jean-Francois Sarrazin; Nagib Chalfoun; Michael Kuhne; Jackie Fortino; Elizabeth Huether; Tammy Lemerand; Frank Pelosi; Frank Bogun; Fred Morady; Aman Chugh Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2007-10-15 Impact factor: 24.094