BACKGROUND: After circumferential ablation for atrial fibrillation, new onset left atrial flutter (LA Flr) may occur. This study assessed the relationship between induced and clinical episodes of LA Flr, the rate of spontaneous resolution of LA Flr, and the proarrhythmic effect of circumferential ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total 112 patients underwent circumferential LA ablation for atrial fibrillation. Immediately after completion of the ablation, LA Flr was induced in 43 of 112 (38%) patients, but was not targeted for ablation. During follow-up (14 +/- 4 months), new onset LA Flr occurred in 28 of 112 (25%) patients; however, the presence of inducible LA Flr did not identify those patients with clinical LA Flr (P = 0.6). In comparison to episodes of atrial fibrillation occurring before circumferential ablation, LA Flr was associated with a faster ventricular rate (124 +/- 19 beats/min vs 91 +/- 16 beats/min, P < 0.001), and was more likely to be persistent requiring cardioversion (86% vs 32%, P = 0.01). By >or=4 months postcircumferential ablation, clinical LA Flr resolved in 18 of 28 patients (64%). A second ablation procedure for LA Flr was performed in 9 of 10 patients. Of the 17 morphologies, 16 (94%) LA Flr circuits were successfully ablated. CONCLUSIONS: (1) LA Flrs that are induced immediately after circumferential ablation for atrial fibrillation do not identify those patients who require a second ablation procedure for clinical LA Flr; (2) Since the majority of clinical LA Flrs spontaneously resolve, ablation of LA Flr should be postponed several months; and (3) new onset LA Flr after ablation for atrial fibrillation is likely a manifestation of the proarrhythmic effect of ablation lines in the LA.
BACKGROUND: After circumferential ablation for atrial fibrillation, new onset left atrial flutter (LA Flr) may occur. This study assessed the relationship between induced and clinical episodes of LA Flr, the rate of spontaneous resolution of LA Flr, and the proarrhythmic effect of circumferential ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total 112 patients underwent circumferential LA ablation for atrial fibrillation. Immediately after completion of the ablation, LA Flr was induced in 43 of 112 (38%) patients, but was not targeted for ablation. During follow-up (14 +/- 4 months), new onset LA Flr occurred in 28 of 112 (25%) patients; however, the presence of inducible LA Flr did not identify those patients with clinical LA Flr (P = 0.6). In comparison to episodes of atrial fibrillation occurring before circumferential ablation, LA Flr was associated with a faster ventricular rate (124 +/- 19 beats/min vs 91 +/- 16 beats/min, P < 0.001), and was more likely to be persistent requiring cardioversion (86% vs 32%, P = 0.01). By >or=4 months postcircumferential ablation, clinical LA Flr resolved in 18 of 28 patients (64%). A second ablation procedure for LA Flr was performed in 9 of 10 patients. Of the 17 morphologies, 16 (94%) LA Flr circuits were successfully ablated. CONCLUSIONS: (1) LA Flrs that are induced immediately after circumferential ablation for atrial fibrillation do not identify those patients who require a second ablation procedure for clinical LA Flr; (2) Since the majority of clinical LA Flrs spontaneously resolve, ablation of LA Flr should be postponed several months; and (3) new onset LA Flr after ablation for atrial fibrillation is likely a manifestation of the proarrhythmic effect of ablation lines in the LA.
Authors: Andrew Robertson Gavin; Cameron B Singleton; John Bowyer; Andrew D McGavigan Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2011-09-21 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Sohail Zahid; Kaitlyn N Whyte; Erica L Schwarz; Robert C Blake; Patrick M Boyle; Jonathan Chrispin; Adityo Prakosa; Esra G Ipek; Farhad Pashakhanloo; Henry R Halperin; Hugh Calkins; Ronald D Berger; Saman Nazarian; Natalia A Trayanova Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2016-04-19 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Demosthenes G Katritsis; Giuseppe Boriani; Francisco G Cosio; Pierre Jais; Gerhard Hindricks; Mark E Josephson; Roberto Keegan; Bradley P Knight; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Deirdre A Lane; Gregory Yh Lip; Helena Malmborg; Hakan Oral; Carlo Pappone; Sakis Themistoclakis; Kathryn A Wood; Kim Young-Hoon; Carina Blomström Lundqvist Journal: Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev Date: 2016
Authors: Ashok J Shah; Amir Jadidi; Xingpeng Liu; Shinsuke Miyazaki; Andrei Forclaz; Isabelle Nault; Lena Rivard; Nick Linton; Olivier Xhaet; Nicolas Derval; Frederic Sacher; Pierre Bordachar; Philippe Ritter; Meleze Hocini; Pierre Jais; Michel Haissaguerre Journal: Cardiol Res Pract Date: 2010-04-07 Impact factor: 1.866
Authors: Patrick M Boyle; Michael J Murphy; Thomas V Karathanos; Sohail Zahid; Robert C Blake; Natalia A Trayanova Journal: J Physiol Date: 2017-12-28 Impact factor: 5.182