Literature DB >> 33454816

Evaluation of the prognostic relevance of the recommended minimum number of lymph nodes in colorectal cancer-a propensity score analysis.

Michaela Ramser1,2, Leonard A Lobbes3, Rene Warschkow4,5, Carsten T Viehl6, Johannes C Lauscher3, Raoul A Droeser1, Christoph Kettelhack1, Markus Zuber1,2, Benjamin Weixler7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Nodal status in colorectal cancer (CRC) is an important prognostic factor, and adequate lymph node (LN) staging is crucial. Whether the number of resected and analysed LN has a direct impact on overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) is much discussed. Guidelines request a minimum number of 12 LN to be analysed. Whether that threshold marks a prognostic relevant cut-off remains unknown.
METHODS: Patients operated for stage I-III CRC were identified from a prospectively maintained database. The impact of the number of analysed LN on OS, CSS and DFS was assessed using Cox regression and propensity score analysis.
RESULTS: Of the 687 patients, 81.8% had ≥ 12 LN resected and analysed. Median LN yield was 17.0 (IQR 13.0-23.0). Resection and analysis of ≥ 12 LN was associated with improved OS (HR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.56-0.95, p = 0.033), CSS (HR 0.52, 95% CI: 0.31-0.85, p = 0.030) and DFS (HR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.57-0.95, p = 0.030) in multivariate Cox analysis. After adjusting for biasing factors with propensity score matching, resection of ≥ 12 LN was significantly associated with improved OS (HR = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.43-0.81; p = 0.002), CSS (HR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.20-0.60; p < 0.001) and DFS (HR = 0.55; 95% CI: 0.41-0.74; p < 0.001) compared to patients with < 12 LN.
CONCLUSION: Eliminating biasing factors by a propensity score matching analysis underlines the prognostic importance of the number of analysed LN. The set threshold marks the minimum number of required LN but nevertheless represents a cut-off regarding outcome in stage I-III CRC. This analysis therefore highlights the significance and importance of adherence to surgical oncological standards.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; Disease-free survival; Lymph nodes; Overall survival; Propensity score analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33454816      PMCID: PMC7952332          DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-03835-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  34 in total

1.  The prognosis of T3N0 colon cancer is dependent on the number of lymph nodes examined.

Authors:  Richard S Swanson; Carolyn C Compton; Andrew K Stewart; Kirby I Bland
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Clinicopathological staging for colorectal cancer: an International Documentation System (IDS) and an International Comprehensive Anatomical Terminology (ICAT).

Authors:  L P Fielding; P A Arsenault; P H Chapuis; O Dent; B Gathright; J D Hardcastle; P Hermanek; J R Jass; R C Newland
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.029

3.  Early colon cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Authors:  R Labianca; B Nordlinger; G D Beretta; S Mosconi; M Mandalà; A Cervantes; D Arnold
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Colorectal Cancer Mortality Rates in Adults Aged 20 to 54 Years in the United States, 1970-2014.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more "personalized" approach to cancer staging.

Authors:  Mahul B Amin; Frederick L Greene; Stephen B Edge; Carolyn C Compton; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Robert K Brookland; Laura Meyer; Donna M Gress; David R Byrd; David P Winchester
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 6.  Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review.

Authors:  George J Chang; Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas; John M Skibber; Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Number of lymph nodes examined and prognosis of TNM stage II colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Leopoldo Sarli; Giovanni Bader; Domenico Iusco; Carlo Salvemini; Davide Di Mauro; Antonio Mazzeo; Gabriele Regina; Luigi Roncoroni
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Staging error does not explain the relationship between the number of lymph nodes in a colon cancer specimen and survival.

Authors:  Jesse Moore; Neil Hyman; Peter Callas; Benjamin Littenberg
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Increased Lymph Node Yield Is Associated With Improved Survival in Rectal Cancer Irrespective of Neoadjuvant Treatment: Results From a National Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jakob Lykke; Per Jess; Ole Roikjaer
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Jon D Vogel; Cagla Eskicioglu; Martin R Weiser; Daniel L Feingold; Scott R Steele
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.585

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.