Literature DB >> 19962166

Staging error does not explain the relationship between the number of lymph nodes in a colon cancer specimen and survival.

Jesse Moore1, Neil Hyman, Peter Callas, Benjamin Littenberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Survival in colon cancer is greater in those patients who have more lymph nodes identified at resection and may be due to stage migration, confounding by treatment, social, or clinical characteristics. Identifying factor(s) responsible for the effect may represent an opportunity to improve quality of care for patients with colon cancer by increasing node counts in specimens.
METHODS: Cox proportional hazards models were created to analyze survival of 11,399 patients with stage I-III colon cancer from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. The primary predictor variable was the number of lymph nodes identified. The models allowed adjustment for patient factors, use of chemotherapy, surgical specialty, and the average number of nodes identified by surgeon and hospital pathologist.
RESULTS: The number of nodes identified was related to survival. Compared to those with less than 7 nodes, patients with 7 to 11 nodes had a 13% lesser risk of death (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.99; P = .037). Patients with more than 12 nodes had a 17% lesser risk (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73-0.95; P = .005). Adjusting for selected patient demographic characteristics, receipt of chemotherapy, surgical specialty, and the average number of nodes identified per specimen by the surgeon or hospital did not significantly alter the relationship between number of nodes and survival.
CONCLUSION: These findings argue against understaging or confounding as the explanation for the inferior survival observed in patients with fewer nodes identified. National initiatives to increase the number of nodes identified in colon cancer specimens may not improve substantially the cancer-specific outcomes. Copyright 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19962166     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  14 in total

1.  Extended lymphadenectomy in colon cancer is debatable.

Authors:  Jamie Murphy; Tonia Young-Fadok
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Controversies in the pathological assessment of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Aoife Maguire; Kieran Sheahan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  The impact of age on quality measure adherence in colon cancer.

Authors:  Scott R Steele; Steven L Chen; Alexander Stojadinovic; Aviram Nissan; Kangmin Zhu; George E Peoples; Anton Bilchik
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 4.  Colorectal cancer and lymph nodes: the obsession with the number 12.

Authors:  Giovanni Li Destri; Isidoro Di Carlo; Roberto Scilletta; Beniamino Scilletta; Stefano Puleo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Surgery along the embryological planes for colon cancer: a systematic review of complete mesocolic excision.

Authors:  Nikolaos Gouvas; Christos Agalianos; Kleio Papaparaskeva; Aristotelis Perrakis; Werner Hohenberger; Evaghelos Xynos
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer: is it worth it?

Authors:  Frederick H Koh; Ker-Kan Tan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-12

7.  High lymph node yield is related to microsatellite instability in colon cancer.

Authors:  E J Th Belt; E A te Velde; O Krijgsman; R P M Brosens; M Tijssen; H F van Essen; H B A C Stockmann; H Bril; B Carvalho; B Ylstra; H J Bonjer; G A Meijer
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  A Nomogram to Predict Adequate Lymph Node Recovery before Resection of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Zhen-Yu Zhang; Cong Li; Wei Gao; Xiao-Wei Yin; Qi-Feng Luo; Nan Liu; Shiva Basnet; Zhen-Ling Dai; Hai-Yan Ge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Lymph node retrieval in colorectal cancer: determining factors and prognostic significance.

Authors:  Johannes Betge; Lars Harbaum; Marion J Pollheimer; Richard A Lindtner; Peter Kornprat; Matthias P Ebert; Cord Langner
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Complete mesocolic excision in right hemicolectomy: comparison between hand-assisted laparoscopic and open approaches.

Authors:  Qin-Song Sheng; Zhe Pan; Jin Chai; Xiao-Bin Cheng; Fan-Long Liu; Jin-Hai Wang; Wen-Bin Chen; Jian-Jiang Lin
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 1.859

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.