Literature DB >> 33453275

Trajectory-based energy landscapes of gene regulatory networks.

Harish Venkatachalapathy1, Samira M Azarin1, Casim A Sarkar2.   

Abstract

Multistability and natural biological variability can result in significant heterogeneity within a cell population, leading to challenges in understanding and modulating cell behavior. Energy landscapes can offer qualitatively intuitive visualizations of cell phenotype and facilitate a more quantitative understanding of cellular dynamics, but current methods for landscape generation are mathematically involved and often require specific system properties (e.g., ergodicity or independent gene/protein probability distributions) that do not always hold. Here, we present a simple kinetic Monte Carlo-based method for landscape generation from a system of ordinary differential equations using only simulation trajectories initialized throughout the phase space of interest. The resulting landscape produces three quantitative features relevant to understanding cell behavior: stability (reflected by the depth or potential of landscape valleys), velocity (representing average directional movement on the landscape), and variance in velocity (indicative of landscape positions with heterogeneous movements). We applied this method to a genetic toggle switch, a core decision-making network in binary cellular responses, to elucidate effects of biologically relevant intrinsic and extrinsic cues. Intrinsic noise, such as stochasticity in transcription-translation and differences in cell cycle position, manifests through changes in valley width and position, reflecting increased population heterogeneity and more probabilistic cell fate transitions. The landscapes also capture the effect of an external inducer, revealing a quantitative correlation between the rate of cell fate transition and the energy barrier above a threshold inducer concentration determined by the permissivity of the valley. Further, in tracking dynamically changing landscapes under time-varying external cues, we unexpectedly found that an oscillatory inducer input can modulate cell fate heterogeneity and lead to periodic cell fate transitions entrained to the input frequency, depending on the intrinsic degradation rate of the switch. The landscape generation approach outlined herein is generalizable to other network topologies and may provide new quantitative insights into their dynamics.
Copyright © 2021 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33453275      PMCID: PMC7896034          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2020.11.2279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  42 in total

1.  Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  T S Gardner; C R Cantor; J J Collins
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-01-20       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Stochastic gene expression in a single cell.

Authors:  Michael B Elowitz; Arnold J Levine; Eric D Siggia; Peter S Swain
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-08-16       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Intracellular Noise Level Determines Ratio Control Strategy Confined by Speed-Accuracy Trade-off.

Authors:  David Menn; Patrick Sochor; Hanah Goetz; Xiao-Jun Tian; Xiao Wang
Journal:  ACS Synth Biol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 5.110

4.  Cell-Cycle Position of Single MYC-Driven Cancer Cells Dictates Their Susceptibility to a Chemotherapeutic Drug.

Authors:  Tatsiana Ryl; Erika E Kuchen; Emma Bell; Chunxuan Shao; Andrés F Flórez; Gregor Mönke; Sina Gogolin; Mona Friedrich; Florian Lamprecht; Frank Westermann; Thomas Höfer
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 10.304

5.  Robust hematopoietic progenitor cell commitment in the presence of a conflicting cue.

Authors:  Najaf A Shah; Marshall J Levesque; Arjun Raj; Casim A Sarkar
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 5.285

6.  Cell Fate Decision as High-Dimensional Critical State Transition.

Authors:  Mitra Mojtahedi; Alexander Skupin; Joseph Zhou; Ivan G Castaño; Rebecca Y Y Leong-Quong; Hannah Chang; Kalliopi Trachana; Alessandro Giuliani; Sui Huang
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  Integrating extrinsic and intrinsic cues into a minimal model of lineage commitment for hematopoietic progenitors.

Authors:  Santhosh Palani; Casim A Sarkar
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Potential energy landscape and robustness of a gene regulatory network: toggle switch.

Authors:  Keun-Young Kim; Jin Wang
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Quantifying cell fate decisions for differentiation and reprogramming of a human stem cell network: landscape and biological paths.

Authors:  Chunhe Li; Jin Wang
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Bursting through the cell cycle.

Authors:  Shani Ben-Moshe; Shalev Itzkovitz
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Is There a Need for a More Precise Description of Biomolecule Interactions to Understand Cell Function?

Authors:  Pierre Bongrand
Journal:  Curr Issues Mol Biol       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 2.976

2.  Dynamic patterns of microRNA expression during acute myeloid leukemia state-transition.

Authors:  David E Frankhouser; Denis O'Meally; Sergio Branciamore; Lisa Uechi; Lianjun Zhang; Ying-Chieh Chen; Man Li; Hanjun Qin; Xiwei Wu; Nadia Carlesso; Guido Marcucci; Russell C Rockne; Ya-Huei Kuo
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 14.957

Review 3.  Mechanotransduction as a major driver of cell behaviour: mechanisms, and relevance to cell organization and future research.

Authors:  Pierre-Henri Puech; Pierre Bongrand
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 6.411

Review 4.  Predictive landscapes hidden beneath biological cellular automata.

Authors:  Lars Koopmans; Hyun Youk
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 1.365

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.