Literature DB >> 33450139

How low can you go? A CBCT dose reduction study.

Arthur J Olch1, Parham Alaei2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is often used for patient setup based solely on bony anatomy. The goal of this work was to evaluate whether CBCT dose can be lowered to the level of kV image pair doses when used for bony anatomy-based IGRT without compromising positioning accuracy.
METHODS: An anthropomorphic phantom was CT scanned in the head, head and neck, chest, and pelvis regions and setup on the linear accelerator couch with the isocenter near the planned location. Cone beam computed tomographies were performed with the standard "full dose" protocol supplied by the linac vendor. With sequentially lowering the dose, three-dimensional (3D) matching was performed for each without shifting the couch. The standard kV image pair protocol for each site was also used to image the phantoms. For all studies, six degrees of freedom was included in the 2D or 3D matching to the extent they could be employed. Imaging doses were determined in air at isocenter following the TG-61 formalism.
RESULTS: Cone beam computed tomography dose was reduced by 81-98% of the standard CBCT protocol to nearly that of the standard kV image pair dose for each site. Relative to the standard CBCT shift values, translational shifts were within 0.3 and 1.6 mm for all sites, for the reduced dose CBCT and kV image pair, respectively. Rotational shifts were within 0.2 degree and 0.7 degrees for all sites, for the reduced dose CBCTs and kV image pair, respectively.
CONCLUSION: For bony anatomy-based image guidance, CBCT dose can be reduced to a value similar to that of a kV image pair with similar or better patient positioning accuracy than kV image pair alignment. Where rotations are important to correct, CBCT will be superior to orthogonal kV imaging without significantly increased imaging dose. This is especially important for image guidance for pediatric patient treatments.
© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CBCT; image gently; imaging dose

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33450139      PMCID: PMC7882101          DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys        ISSN: 1526-9914            Impact factor:   2.102


  13 in total

1.  Clinical implementation of AAPM TG61 protocol for kilovoltage x-ray beam dosimetry.

Authors:  Sua Yoo; Daniel Grimm; Ron Zhu; Paul Jursinic; Francisco Lopez; Jason Rownd; Michael Gillin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Quality assurance for the geometric accuracy of cone-beam CT guidance in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Bissonnette; Doug Moseley; Elizabeth White; Michael Sharpe; Tom Purdie; David A Jaffray
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  AAPM TG 158: Measurement and calculation of doses outside the treated volume from external-beam radiation therapy.

Authors:  Stephen F Kry; Bryan Bednarz; Rebecca M Howell; Larry Dauer; David Followill; Eric Klein; Harald Paganetti; Brian Wang; Cheng-Shie Wuu; X George Xu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-08-20       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  Exposure Risks Among Children Undergoing Radiation Therapy: Considerations in the Era of Image Guided Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Clayton B Hess; Holly M Thompson; Stanley H Benedict; J Anthony Seibert; Kenneth Wong; Andrew T Vaughan; Allen M Chen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Precision of 2 Low-dose Abdomen/Pelvis Cone Beam Computed Tomography Protocols for Alignment to Bone and Soft Tissue in Pediatric Patients Receiving Image Guided Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Avani D Rao; Junghoon Lee; Wei Fu; Sarah Nicholas; Sara R Alcorn; Joseph Moore; Matthew Ladra; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Steven Bartolac; Stephanie A Terezakis
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-01-23

6.  Practice patterns and recommendations for pediatric image-guided radiotherapy: A Children's Oncology Group report.

Authors:  Chia-Ho Hua; Tamara Z Vern-Gross; Clayton B Hess; Arthur J Olch; Parham Alaei; Vythialingam Sathiaseelan; Jun Deng; Kenneth Ulin; Fran Laurie; Mahesh Gopalakrishnan; Natia Esiashvili; Suzanne L Wolden; Matthew J Krasin; Thomas E Merchant; Sarah S Donaldson; Thomas J FitzGerald; Louis S Constine; David C Hodgson; Daphne A Haas-Kogan; Anita Mahajan; Nadia N Laack; Karen J Marcus; Paige A Taylor; Verity A Ahern; David S Followill; Jeffrey C Buchsbaum; John C Breneman; John A Kalapurakal
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2020-08-09       Impact factor: 3.167

7.  Clinical Assessment of 2D/3D Registration Accuracy in 4 Major Anatomic Sites Using On-Board 2D Kilovoltage Images for 6D Patient Setup.

Authors:  Guang Li; T Jonathan Yang; Hugo Furtado; Wolfgang Birkfellner; Åse Ballangrud; Simon N Powell; James Mechalakos
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-09-15

8.  Low-Dose Image-Guided Pediatric CNS Radiation Therapy: Final Analysis From a Prospective Low-Dose Cone-Beam CT Protocol From a Multinational Pediatrics Consortium.

Authors:  Sara R Alcorn; Xian Chiong Zhou; Casey Bojechko; Rodrigo A Rubo; Michael J Chen; Karin Dieckmann; Ralph P Ermoian; Eric C Ford; Daria Kobyzeva; Shannon M MacDonald; Todd R McNutt; Alexey Nechesnyuk; Kristina Nilsson; Hakan Sjostrand; Koren S Smith; Markus Stock; Erik J Tryggestad; Rosangela C Villar; Brian A Winey; Stephanie A Terezakis
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec

9.  Paediatric image-guided radiation therapy: determining and evaluating appropriate kilovoltage planar exposure factors for the Varian on-board imager.

Authors:  John Ryan; David Willis
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2019-09-03

10.  Imaging dose and secondary cancer risk in image-guided radiotherapy of pediatric patients.

Authors:  Yvonne Dzierma; Katharina Mikulla; Patrick Richter; Katharina Bell; Patrick Melchior; Frank Nuesken; Christian Rübe
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.