Literature DB >> 33446794

Multifocal acceptance score to evaluate vision: MAS-2EV.

Xoana Barcala1, Maria Vinas2, Mercedes Romero2, Enrique Gambra3, Juan Luis Mendez-Gonzalez3, Susana Marcos2, Carlos Dorronsoro2.   

Abstract

We present a new metric (Multifocal Acceptance Score, MAS-2EV) to evaluate vision with presbyopic corrections. The MAS-2EV is based on a set of images representing natural visual scenes at day and night conditions projected in far and near displays, and a near stereo target. Subjects view and score the images through different binocular corrections (monofocal corrections at far; bifocal corrections; monovision and modified monovision) administered with soft contact lenses (in cyclopleged young subjects) or with a binocular simultaneous vision simulator (in presbyopic and cyclopleged young subjects). MAS-2EV scores are visually represented in the form of polygons, and quantified using different metrics: overall visual quality, visual degradation at far, visual benefit at near, near stereo benefit, visual imbalance near-far, overall visual imbalance and a combined overall performance metric. We have found that the MAS-2EV has sufficient repeatability and sensitivity to allow differentiation across corrections with only two repetitions, and the duration of the psychophysical task (3 min for subject/condition/correction) makes it useable in the clinic. We found that in most subjects binocular bifocal corrections produce the lowest visual imbalance, and the highest near stereo benefit. 46.67% of the subjects ranked binocular bifocal corrections first, and 46.67% of the subjects ranked monovision first. MAS-2EV, particularly in combination with visual simulators, can be applied to select prospective presbyopic corrections in patients prior to contact lens fitting or intraocular lens implantation.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33446794      PMCID: PMC7809428          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81059-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  26 in total

1.  The development of an instrument to measure quality of vision: the Quality of Vision (QoV) questionnaire.

Authors:  Colm McAlinden; Konrad Pesudovs; Jonathan E Moore
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 2.  Developments in the correction of presbyopia I: spectacle and contact lenses.

Authors:  W Neil Charman
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Liquid crystal Adaptive Optics Visual Simulator: Application to testing and design of ophthalmic optical elements.

Authors:  Silvestre Manzanera; Pedro M Prieto; Diego B Ayala; Joseph M Lindacher; Pablo Artal
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Experimental validations of a tunable-lens-based visual demonstrator of multifocal corrections.

Authors:  Vyas Akondi; Lucie Sawides; Yassine Marrakchi; Enrique Gambra; Susana Marcos; Carlos Dorronsoro
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  Impact of corneal aberrations on through-focus image quality of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses using an adaptive optics bench system.

Authors:  Len Zheleznyak; Myoung Joon Kim; Scott MacRae; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 6.  Monovision: a review.

Authors:  Bruce J W Evans
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Catquest-9SF patient outcomes questionnaire: nine-item short-form Rasch-scaled revision of the Catquest questionnaire.

Authors:  Mats Lundström; Konrad Pesudovs
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  Visual simulators replicate vision with multifocal lenses.

Authors:  Maria Vinas; Clara Benedi-Garcia; Sara Aissati; Daniel Pascual; Vyas Akondi; Carlos Dorronsoro; Susana Marcos
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Short-term neural adaptation to simultaneous bifocal images.

Authors:  Aiswaryah Radhakrishnan; Carlos Dorronsoro; Lucie Sawides; Susana Marcos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Development of the Contact Lens User Experience: CLUE Scales.

Authors:  R J Wirth; Michael C Edwards; Michael Henderson; Terri Henderson; Giovanna Olivares; Carrie R Houts
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.973

View more
  1 in total

1.  Visual performance with multifocal lenses in young adults and presbyopes.

Authors:  Shrilekha Vedhakrishnan; Maria Vinas; Clara Benedi-Garcia; Pilar Casado; Susana Marcos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.