Literature DB >> 24205890

Developments in the correction of presbyopia I: spectacle and contact lenses.

W Neil Charman1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To outline the refractive problems associated with presbyopia and to review the basis and relative merits of currently-available methods for their correction, with detailed consideration of spectacle and contact lens approaches. CONTENTS: In the developed world, most of the present population will spend roughly half their lives as presbyopes. The well-known presbyopic changes with age in amplitude of accommodation and required near addition are briefly reviewed, together with the less widely acknowledged slow drifts that occur in distance refraction. The desirability of restoring to presbyopes clear vision for objects at any distance, ideally corresponding to vergences within the range of at least 0 to -5 D, in any viewing direction, is stressed. A general outline is given of possible corrective methods. Methods which satisfy the needs of a 50 year-old may not be suitable for the 80 year-old. Corrections may involve both fixed- and variable-focus lens systems, and surgical methods which modify the optics of the cornea, replace the crystalline lens with different fixed optics, or attempt to at least partially restore active accommodation. Some more recent methods of spectacle and contact lens correction are described in more detail. Particular attention is given to recent commercially-developed spectacles in which the corrective power can be varied actively by either mechanical (liquid-filled deformable lenses or Alvarez lenses) or electrical (liquid crystal lenses) means to allow objects at different distances to be seen clearly. Contact lens corrections show less progress and are still preferred only by a minority of older patients, most of whom are early presbyopes.
SUMMARY: The rising proportion of presbyopes in the population, covering an age span of around 40 years, represents both a problem for those concerned with giving their patients the best vision possible at both far and near viewing distances and a commercial opportunity. Traditional single-vision distance and near, bifocal, and progressive spectacle lens solutions, together with contact lens modalities for presbyopic correction, are being challenged by a variety of new approaches. It remains to be seen whether the latter will receive wide acceptance in practice.
© 2013 The Authors Ophthalmic& Physiological Optics © 2013 The College of Optometrists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  contact lenses; near additions; presbyopia; spectacle lenses; variable power

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24205890     DOI: 10.1111/opo.12091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  26 in total

1.  Temporal multiplexing with adaptive optics for simultaneous vision.

Authors:  Eleni Papadatou; Antonio J Del Águila-Carrasco; Iván Marín-Franch; Norberto López-Gil
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Objective assessment of the effect of pupil size upon the power distribution of multifocal contact lenses.

Authors:  Eleni Papadatou; Antonio J Del Águila-Carrasco; José J Esteve-Taboada; David Madrid-Costa; Alejandro Cerviño-Expósito
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Quantification of the ciliary muscle and crystalline lens interaction during accommodation with synchronous OCT imaging.

Authors:  Marco Ruggeri; Carolina de Freitas; Siobhan Williams; Victor M Hernandez; Florence Cabot; Nilufer Yesilirmak; Karam Alawa; Yu-Cherng Chang; Sonia H Yoo; Giovanni Gregori; Jean-Marie Parel; Fabrice Manns
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Immediate cortical adaptation in visual and non-visual areas functions induced by monovision.

Authors:  Fabrizio Zeri; Marika Berchicci; Shehzad A Naroo; Sabrina Pitzalis; Francesco Di Russo
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  In vivo measurement of the attenuation coefficient of the sclera and ciliary muscle.

Authors:  Gabrielle Monterano Mesquita; Disha Patel; Yu-Cherng Chang; Florence Cabot; Marco Ruggeri; Sonia H Yoo; Arthur Ho; Jean-Marie A Parel; Fabrice Manns
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Development and Validation of a Lighting Facility for the Objective Assessment of the Visual Performance of Presbyopic Patients in a Series of Activities of Daily Living.

Authors:  Georgios Labiris; Eirini-Kanella Panagiotopoulou; Panagiota Ntonti
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-28

7.  Living with presbyopia: experiences from a virtual roundtable dialogue among impacted individuals and healthcare professionals.

Authors:  Mile Brujic; Paola Kruger; Jeff Todd; Elizabeth Barnes; Mark Wuttke; Flavia Perna; Jorge Aliò
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 2.086

8.  Pupil diameter, working distance and illumination during habitual tasks. Implications for simultaneous vision contact lenses for presbyopia.

Authors:  Genís Cardona; Sílvia López
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2015-10-09

Review 9.  Presbyopia - A Review of Current Treatment Options and Emerging Therapies.

Authors:  James A Katz; Paul M Karpecki; Alexandra Dorca; Sima Chiva-Razavi; Heather Floyd; Elizabeth Barnes; Mark Wuttke; Eric Donnenfeld
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-24

10.  Intermediate addition multifocals provide safe stair ambulation with adequate 'short-term' reading.

Authors:  David B Elliott; John Hotchkiss; Andrew J Scally; Richard Foster; John G Buckley
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.