Literature DB >> 33446756

Deep neural network model of haptic saliency.

Anna Metzger1, Matteo Toscani2, Arash Akbarinia2, Matteo Valsecchi3, Knut Drewing2.   

Abstract

Haptic exploration usually involves stereotypical systematic movements that are adapted to the task. Here we tested whether exploration movements are also driven by physical stimulus features. We designed haptic stimuli, whose surface relief varied locally in spatial frequency, height, orientation, and anisotropy. In Experiment 1, participants subsequently explored two stimuli in order to decide whether they were same or different. We trained a variational autoencoder to predict the spatial distribution of touch duration from the surface relief of the haptic stimuli. The model successfully predicted where participants touched the stimuli. It could also predict participants' touch distribution from the stimulus' surface relief when tested with two new groups of participants, who performed a different task (Exp. 2) or explored different stimuli (Exp. 3). We further generated a large number of virtual surface reliefs (uniformly expressing a certain combination of features) and correlated the model's responses with stimulus properties to understand the model's preferences in order to infer which stimulus features were preferentially touched by participants. Our results indicate that haptic exploratory behavior is to some extent driven by the physical features of the stimuli, with e.g. edge-like structures, vertical and horizontal patterns, and rough regions being explored in more detail.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33446756      PMCID: PMC7809404          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-80675-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  21 in total

1.  Haptic detection thresholds of Gaussian profiles over the whole range of spatial scales.

Authors:  S Louw; A M Kappers; J J Koenderink
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Amplitude and spatial-period discrimination in sinusoidal gratings by dynamic touch.

Authors:  H T Nefs; A M Kappers; J J Koenderink
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Force can overcome object geometry in the perception of shape through active touch.

Authors:  G Robles-De-La-Torre; V Hayward
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-07-26       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Importance of temporal cues for tactile spatial- frequency discrimination.

Authors:  E Gamzu; E Ahissar
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Eye movements and the control of actions in everyday life.

Authors:  Michael F Land
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2006-03-03       Impact factor: 21.198

6.  Integration of force and position cues for shape perception through active touch.

Authors:  Knut Drewing; Marc O Ernst
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Kinematics of unconstrained tactile texture exploration.

Authors:  Thierri Callier; Hannes P Saal; Elizabeth C Davis-Berg; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Variational autoencoder: An unsupervised model for encoding and decoding fMRI activity in visual cortex.

Authors:  Kuan Han; Haiguang Wen; Junxing Shi; Kun-Han Lu; Yizhen Zhang; Di Fu; Zhongming Liu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Deciphering image contrast in object classification deep networks.

Authors:  Arash Akbarinia; Raquel Gil-Rodríguez
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  What can saliency models predict about eye movements? Spatial and sequential aspects of fixations during encoding and recognition.

Authors:  Tom Foulsham; Geoffrey Underwood
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.