Minghao Chia1,2, Cai Li1,3, Sueli Marques4, Vicente Pelechano4, Nicholas M Luscombe1,5,6, Folkert J van Werven7. 1. The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK. 2. Genome Institute of Singapore, 60 Biopolis Street, Genome, #02-01, Singapore, 138672, Singapore. 3. School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. 4. SciLifeLab, Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden. 5. Okinawa Institute of Science & Technology Graduate University, Okinawa, 904-0495, Japan. 6. UCL Genetics Institute, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK. 7. The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK. folkert.vanwerven@crick.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The start and end sites of messenger RNAs (TSSs and TESs) are highly regulated, often in a cell-type-specific manner. Yet the contribution of transcript diversity in regulating gene expression remains largely elusive. We perform an integrative analysis of multiple highly synchronized cell-fate transitions and quantitative genomic techniques in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to identify regulatory functions associated with transcribing alternative isoforms. RESULTS: Cell-fate transitions feature widespread elevated expression of alternative TSS and, to a lesser degree, TES usage. These dynamically regulated alternative TSSs are located mostly upstream of canonical TSSs, but also within gene bodies possibly encoding for protein isoforms. Increased upstream alternative TSS usage is linked to various effects on canonical TSS levels, which range from co-activation to repression. We identified two key features linked to these outcomes: an interplay between alternative and canonical promoter strengths, and distance between alternative and canonical TSSs. These two regulatory properties give a plausible explanation of how locally transcribed alternative TSSs control gene transcription. Additionally, we find that specific chromatin modifiers Set2, Set3, and FACT play an important role in mediating gene repression via alternative TSSs, further supporting that the act of upstream transcription drives the local changes in gene transcription. CONCLUSIONS: The integrative analysis of multiple cell-fate transitions suggests the presence of a regulatory control system of alternative TSSs that is important for dynamic tuning of gene expression. Our work provides a framework for understanding how TSS heterogeneity governs eukaryotic gene expression, particularly during cell-fate changes.
BACKGROUND: The start and end sites of messenger RNAs (TSSs and TESs) are highly regulated, often in a cell-type-specific manner. Yet the contribution of transcript diversity in regulating gene expression remains largely elusive. We perform an integrative analysis of multiple highly synchronized cell-fate transitions and quantitative genomic techniques in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to identify regulatory functions associated with transcribing alternative isoforms. RESULTS: Cell-fate transitions feature widespread elevated expression of alternative TSS and, to a lesser degree, TES usage. These dynamically regulated alternative TSSs are located mostly upstream of canonical TSSs, but also within gene bodies possibly encoding for protein isoforms. Increased upstream alternative TSS usage is linked to various effects on canonical TSS levels, which range from co-activation to repression. We identified two key features linked to these outcomes: an interplay between alternative and canonical promoter strengths, and distance between alternative and canonical TSSs. These two regulatory properties give a plausible explanation of how locally transcribed alternative TSSs control gene transcription. Additionally, we find that specific chromatin modifiers Set2, Set3, and FACT play an important role in mediating gene repression via alternative TSSs, further supporting that the act of upstream transcription drives the local changes in gene transcription. CONCLUSIONS: The integrative analysis of multiple cell-fate transitions suggests the presence of a regulatory control system of alternative TSSs that is important for dynamic tuning of gene expression. Our work provides a framework for understanding how TSS heterogeneity governs eukaryotic gene expression, particularly during cell-fate changes.
Authors: Marco Mangone; Arun Prasad Manoharan; Danielle Thierry-Mieg; Jean Thierry-Mieg; Ting Han; Sebastian D Mackowiak; Emily Mis; Charles Zegar; Michelle R Gutwein; Vishal Khivansara; Oliver Attie; Kevin Chen; Kourosh Salehi-Ashtiani; Marc Vidal; Timothy T Harkins; Pascal Bouffard; Yutaka Suzuki; Sumio Sugano; Yuji Kohara; Nikolaus Rajewsky; Fabio Piano; Kristin C Gunsalus; John K Kim Journal: Science Date: 2010-06-03 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Zheng Xia; Lawrence A Donehower; Thomas A Cooper; Joel R Neilson; David A Wheeler; Eric J Wagner; Wei Li Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2014-11-20 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Deniz Demircioğlu; Engin Cukuroglu; Martin Kindermans; Tannistha Nandi; Claudia Calabrese; Nuno A Fonseca; André Kahles; Kjong-Van Lehmann; Oliver Stegle; Alvis Brazma; Angela N Brooks; Gunnar Rätsch; Patrick Tan; Jonathan Göke Journal: Cell Date: 2019-09-05 Impact factor: 41.582