Li-Tang Tsai1, Eleanor Boyle2, Jan C Brønd3, Gry Kock4, Mathias Skjødt4, Lars G Hvid5, Paolo Caserotti4. 1. Muscle Physiology and Biomechanics Unit, Center for Active and Healthy Ageing, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, Odense M, 5230, Odense, Denmark. ltsai@health.sdu.dk. 2. Clinical Biomechanics Unit, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. 3. Centre of Research in Childhood Health, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. 4. Muscle Physiology and Biomechanics Unit, Center for Active and Healthy Ageing, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, Odense M, 5230, Odense, Denmark. 5. Exercise Biology, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Older adults are recommended to sleep 7-8 h/day. Time in bed (TIB) differs from sleep duration and includes also the time of lying in bed without sleeping. Long TIB (≥9 h) are associated with self-reported sedentary behavior, but the association between objectively measured physical activity, sedentary behavior and TIB is unknown. METHODS: This study was based on cross-sectional analysis of the Healthy Ageing Network of Competence (HANC Study). Physical activity and sedentary behaviour were measured by a tri-axial accelerometer (ActiGraph) placed on the dominant wrist for 7 days. Sedentary behavior was classified as < 2303 counts per minute (cpm) in vector magnitude and physical activity intensities were categorized, as 2303-4999 and ≥ 5000 cpm in vector magnitude. TIB was recorded in self-reported diaries. Participants were categorized as UTIB (usually having TIB 7-9 h/night: ≥80% of measurement days), STIB (sometimes having TIB 7-9 h/night: 20-79% of measurement days), and RTIB (rarely having TIB 7-9 h/night: < 20% of measurement days). Multinominal regression models were used to calculate the relative risk ratios (RRR) of being RTIB and STIB by daily levels of physical activity and SB, with UTIB as the reference group. The models were adjusted for age, sex, average daily nap length and physical function. RESULTS: Three hundred and fourty-one older adults (median age 81 (IQR 5), 62% women) were included with median TIB of 8 h 21 min (1 h 10 min)/day, physical activity level of 2054 (864) CPM with 64 (15) % of waking hours in sedentary behavior. Those with average CPM within the highest tertile had a lower RRR (0.33 (0.15-0.71), p = 0.005) for being RTIB compared to those within the lowest tertile of average CPM. Accumulating physical activity in intensities 2303-4999 and ≥ 5000 cpm/day did not affect the RRR of being RTIB. RRR of being RTIB among highly sedentary participants (≥10 h/day of sedentary behavior) more than tripled compared to those who were less sedentary (3.21 (1.50-6.88), p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: For older adults, being physically active and less sedentary was associated with being in bed for 7-9 h/night for most nights (≥80%). Future longitudinal studies are warranted to explore the causal relationship sbetween physical activity and sleep duration.
BACKGROUND: Older adults are recommended to sleep 7-8 h/day. Time in bed (TIB) differs from sleep duration and includes also the time of lying in bed without sleeping. Long TIB (≥9 h) are associated with self-reported sedentary behavior, but the association between objectively measured physical activity, sedentary behavior and TIB is unknown. METHODS: This study was based on cross-sectional analysis of the Healthy Ageing Network of Competence (HANC Study). Physical activity and sedentary behaviour were measured by a tri-axial accelerometer (ActiGraph) placed on the dominant wrist for 7 days. Sedentary behavior was classified as < 2303 counts per minute (cpm) in vector magnitude and physical activity intensities were categorized, as 2303-4999 and ≥ 5000 cpm in vector magnitude. TIB was recorded in self-reported diaries. Participants were categorized as UTIB (usually having TIB 7-9 h/night: ≥80% of measurement days), STIB (sometimes having TIB 7-9 h/night: 20-79% of measurement days), and RTIB (rarely having TIB 7-9 h/night: < 20% of measurement days). Multinominal regression models were used to calculate the relative risk ratios (RRR) of being RTIB and STIB by daily levels of physical activity and SB, with UTIB as the reference group. The models were adjusted for age, sex, average daily nap length and physical function. RESULTS: Three hundred and fourty-one older adults (median age 81 (IQR 5), 62% women) were included with median TIB of 8 h 21 min (1 h 10 min)/day, physical activity level of 2054 (864) CPM with 64 (15) % of waking hours in sedentary behavior. Those with average CPM within the highest tertile had a lower RRR (0.33 (0.15-0.71), p = 0.005) for being RTIB compared to those within the lowest tertile of average CPM. Accumulating physical activity in intensities 2303-4999 and ≥ 5000 cpm/day did not affect the RRR of being RTIB. RRR of being RTIB among highly sedentary participants (≥10 h/day of sedentary behavior) more than tripled compared to those who were less sedentary (3.21 (1.50-6.88), p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: For older adults, being physically active and less sedentary was associated with being in bed for 7-9 h/night for most nights (≥80%). Future longitudinal studies are warranted to explore the causal relationship sbetween physical activity and sleep duration.
Authors: Tatiana Y Warren; Vaughn Barry; Steven P Hooker; Xuemei Sui; Timothy S Church; Steven N Blair Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Sari Stenholm; Erkki Kronholm; Päivi Sainio; Katja Borodulin; Pertti Era; Mikael Fogelholm; Timo Partonen; Tarja Porkka-Heiskanen; Seppo Koskinen Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2010-02-16 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Thuy-Tien L Dam; Susan Ewing; Sonia Ancoli-Israel; Kristine Ensrud; Susan Redline; Katie Stone Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2008-08-25 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Brent Hutto; Virginia J Howard; Steven N Blair; Natalie Colabianchi; John E Vena; David Rhodes; Steven P Hooker Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2013-10-25 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Kelli L Cain; Terry L Conway; Marc A Adams; Lisa E Husak; James F Sallis Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2013-04-25 Impact factor: 6.457