| Literature DB >> 35680963 |
Jiang-Hui Wang1, Grace E Lidgerwood1,2, Maciej Daniszewski2, Monica L Hu1, Georgina E Roberts1, Raymond C B Wong1,3,4, Sandy S C Hung1,3, Michelle E McClements5, Alex W Hewitt1,3,6, Alice Pébay2,7, Doron G Hickey1, Thomas L Edwards8,9.
Abstract
Bietti crystalline dystrophy (BCD) is an inherited retinal disease (IRD) caused by mutations in the CYP4V2 gene. It is a relatively common cause of IRD in east Asia. A number of features of this disease make it highly amenable to gene supplementation therapy. This study aims to validate a series of essential precursor in vitro experiments prior to developing a clinical gene therapy for BCD. We demonstrated that HEK293, ARPE19, and patient induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived RPE cells transduced with AAV2 vectors encoding codon optimization of CYP4V2 (AAV2.coCYP4V2) resulted in elevated protein expression levels of CYP4V2 compared to those transduced with AAV2 vectors encoding wild type CYP4V2 (AAV2.wtCYP4V2), as assessed by immunocytochemistry and western blot. Similarly, we observed significantly increased CYP4V2 enzyme activity in cells transduced with AAV2.coCYP4V2 compared to those transduced with AAV2.wtCYP4V2. We also showed CYP4V2 expression in human RPE/choroid explants transduced with AAV2.coCYP4V2 compared to those transduced with AAV2.wtCYP4V2. These preclinical data support the further development of a gene supplementation therapy for a currently untreatable blinding condition-BCD. Codon-optimized CYP4V2 transgene was superior to wild type in terms of protein expression and enzyme activity. Ex vivo culture of human RPE cells provided an effective approach to test AAV-mediated transgene delivery.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35680963 PMCID: PMC9184470 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-12210-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1CYP4V2 expression in human RPE and plasmids CYP4V2-encoding plasmids. (A) CYP4V2 is highly expressed in human RPE cells (TPM: transcripts per million) and ranks 4th among other CYP family genes, as determined by RNA-seq. (B) Schematic diagrams of plasmids encoding wild-type or codon-optimized CYP4V2 transgenes driven by a CAG (CMV-enhanced chicken beta-actin) promoter. (C and D) Strong CYP4V2 expression was observed in HEK293 cells transfected with p.coCYP4V2 compared to those transfected with p.wtCYP4V2, assessed by western blot and immunocytochemistry analysis, respectively. (E) CYP enzyme activity was measured in HEK293 cells transfected with p.eGFP, p.Exon7Del, p.992A > C p.CYP4X1, p.CYP1B1, p.wtCYP4V2 and p.coCYP4V2. The latter four plasmid transfections were exposed to a dose response experiment with HET0016, a selective inhibitor of CYP4V2. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 6). ****p < 0.00001. ns, not significant.
Figure 5CYP4V2 expression in human RPE from retinal explant ex vivo culture transduced with AAV2. (A) The process of setting up ex vivo cultures of the human retina. Star indicates the 4 mm-diameter circular neural retinas and RPE/choroid trephined from the eye using a Biopsy Punch. (B) Immunohistochemistry showed a relatively stronger expression of CYP4V2 in the human RPE ex vivo culture transduced with AAV2.coCYP4V2 compared with those transduced with AAV2.wtCYP4V2.
Figure 2CYP4V2 expression following AAV2 transduction of cultured cells. (A and B) CYP4V2 expression in HEK293 and ARPE19 cells transduced with AAV2.wtCYP4V2 and AAV2.coCYP4V2, respectively, at multiplicities of infection (MOI) from 10E3 to 10E5, assessed by Western blot. (C and D) CYP4V2 expression in HEK293 and ARPE19 cells transduced with AAV2.wtCYP4V2 and AAV2.coCYP4V2, respectively at MOI of 10E5, assessed by immunocytochemistry. (E and F) CYP4V2 enzyme activity was quantified by Multi-CYP assay in HEK293 and ARPE19 cells transduced with AAV2.wtCYP4V2, AAV2.coCYP4V2 and control AAV2.eGFP. Mean ± SEM (n = 6). **p < 0.01. ****p < 0.00001. ns, not significant.
Figure 3Diagnosis of a BCD patient and iPSCs generation. (A) Fundus image showing characteristic crystalline deposits. (B) OCT images show hyper-reflective crystalline deposits above the RPE in the BCD patients. Arrows indicate crystalline deposits. (C) Sanger sequencing showed a point mutation of CYP4V2 in the BCD patient (highlighted in pink). (D) The level of CYP4V2 mRNA in skin fibroblasts was significantly greater in the control than in the cells from the BCD patient. (E) Markers (including OCT-4, TRA-1–60, NESTIN, AFP and SMA) for iPSCs immunostaining. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05.
Figure 4CYP4V2 expression in BCD iPSCs-derived RPE cells. (A) A schematic summary of the process of generation of iPSCs-RPE cells. (B and C) mRNA and protein expression of CYP4V2 was lower in BCD iPSCs-derived RPE (CYP4V2mt) cells than in control (CYP4V2wt) cells, as assessed by qPCR and western blot, respectively. (D) Immunocytochemistry showed stronger expression of CYP4V2 in BCD iPSCs-derived RPE cells transduced with AAV2.coCYP4V2 compared to those transduced with AAV2.wtCYP4V2 and untransduced controls. (E) CYP4V2 enzyme activity was quantified in BCD iPSCs-derived RPE cells transduced with AAV2.wtCYP4V2, AAV2.coCYP4V2 and control AAV2.eGFP, and data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 12). ***p < 0.0001. ns, not significant.