Literature DB >> 33444843

Random Forest-Based Prediction of Outcome and Mortality in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury Undergoing Primary Decompressive Craniectomy.

Martin Hanko1, Marián Grendár2, Pavol Snopko3, René Opšenák3, Juraj Šutovský3, Martin Benčo3, Jakub Soršák4, Kamil Zeleňák4, Branislav Kolarovszki3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Various prognostic models are used to predict mortality and functional outcome in patients after traumatic brain injury with a trend to incorporate machine learning protocols. None of these models is focused exactly on the subgroup of patients indicated for decompressive craniectomy. Evidence regarding efficiency of this surgery is still incomplete, especially in patients undergoing primary decompressive craniectomy with evacuation of traumatic mass lesions.
METHODS: In a prospective study with a 6-month follow-up period, we assessed postoperative outcome and mortality of 40 patients who underwent primary decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injuries during 2018-2019. The results were analyzed in relation to a wide spectrum of preoperatively available demographic, clinical, radiographic, and laboratory data. Random forest algorithms were trained for prediction of both mortality and unfavorable outcome, with their accuracy quantified by area under the receiver operating curves (AUCs) for out-of-bag samples.
RESULTS: At the end of the follow-up period, we observed mortality of 57.5%. Favorable outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale [GOS] score 4-5) was achieved by 30% of our patients. Random forest-based prediction models constructed for 6-month mortality and outcome reached a moderate predictive ability, with AUC = 0.811 and AUC = 0.873, respectively. Random forest models trained on handpicked variables showed slightly decreased AUC = 0.787 for 6-month mortality and AUC = 0.846 for 6-month outcome and increased out-of-bag error rates.
CONCLUSIONS: Random forest algorithms show promising results in prediction of postoperative outcome and mortality in patients undergoing primary decompressive craniectomy. The best performance was achieved by Classification Random forest for 6-month outcome.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decompressive craniectomy; Machine learning; Outcome; Random forest; Traumatic brain injury

Year:  2021        PMID: 33444843     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  9 in total

1.  Comparing human milk macronutrients measured using analyzers based on mid-infrared spectroscopy and ultrasound and the application of machine learning in data fitting.

Authors:  Huijuan Ruan; Qingya Tang; Yajie Zhang; Xuelin Zhao; Yi Xiang; Yi Feng; Wei Cai
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 3.105

2.  Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning for clinical outcome prediction.

Authors:  Rowland W Pettit; Robert Fullem; Chao Cheng; Christopher I Amos
Journal:  Emerg Top Life Sci       Date:  2021-12-20

3.  Metabolomic Profiling Reveals That 5-Hydroxylysine and 1-Methylnicotinamide Are Metabolic Indicators of Keloid Severity.

Authors:  Mengjie Shan; Hao Liu; Yan Hao; Kexin Song; Tian Meng; Cheng Feng; Youbin Wang; Yongsheng Huang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  MRI Radiomics Features From Infarction and Cerebrospinal Fluid for Prediction of Cerebral Edema After Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Liang Jiang; Chuanyang Zhang; Siyu Wang; Zhongping Ai; Tingwen Shen; Hong Zhang; Shaofeng Duan; Xindao Yin; Yu-Chen Chen
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 5.750

5.  A machine learning approach for identification of gastrointestinal predictors for the risk of COVID-19 related hospitalization.

Authors:  Peter Lipták; Peter Banovcin; Róbert Rosoľanka; Michal Prokopič; Ivan Kocan; Ivana Žiačiková; Peter Uhrik; Marian Grendar; Rudolf Hyrdel
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Efficacy Analysis of Team-Based Nursing Compliance in Young and Middle-Aged Diabetes Mellitus Patients Based on Random Forest Algorithm and Logistic Regression.

Authors:  Dongni Qian; Hong Gao
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 2.809

7.  Learning Models for Traumatic Brain Injury Mortality Prediction on Pediatric Electronic Health Records.

Authors:  João Fonseca; Xiuyun Liu; Hélder P Oliveira; Tania Pereira
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.086

8.  Multiple Machine Learning Methods Reveal Key Biomarkers of Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Treatment.

Authors:  Jie Zhu; Larry D Sanford; Rong Ren; Ye Zhang; Xiangdong Tang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Predicting Outcome of Traumatic Brain Injury: Is Machine Learning the Best Way?

Authors:  Roberta Bruschetta; Gennaro Tartarisco; Lucia Francesca Lucca; Elio Leto; Maria Ursino; Paolo Tonin; Giovanni Pioggia; Antonio Cerasa
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-03-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.