Literature DB >> 33443904

Exploring Emotional Responses After Postoperative Complications: A Qualitative Study of Practicing Surgeons.

C Ann Vitous1, Mary E Byrnes, Ana De Roo, Sara M Jafri, Pasithorn A Suwanabol.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This qualitative study explored the impact of postoperative complications on surgeons and their well-being.
BACKGROUND: Complications are an inherent component of surgical practice. Although there have been extensive efforts to reduce postoperative complications, the impact of complications on surgeons have not been well-studied. Surgeons are often left to process their own emotional responses to these complications, the effects of which are not well characterized.
METHODS: We conducted 46 semi-structured interviews with a diverse range of surgeons practicing across Michigan to explore their responses to postoperative complications and the effect on overall well-being. The data were analyzed iteratively, through steps informed by thematic analysis.
RESULTS: Participants described feelings of sadness, anxiety, frustration, grief, failure, and disappointment after postoperative complications. When asked to elaborate on these responses, participants described internal processes such as feelings of personal responsibility and failure, self-doubt, and failing the patient and family. Participants also described external pressures influencing the responses, which included potential impact to reputation and medicolegal issues. Experience level, type of complication, and the surgeon's individual personality were specific factors that influenced the intensity of these responses.
CONCLUSION: Surgeons' emotional responses after postoperative complications may negatively impact individual well-being, and may represent a threat to the profession altogether if these issues remain inadequately recognized and addressed. Knowledge of the impact of unwanted or unexpected outcomes on surgeons is critical in developing and implementing strategies to cope with the challenges frequently encountered in the surgical profession.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 33443904      PMCID: PMC9437841          DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   13.787


  20 in total

1.  Medical error: the second victim. The doctor who makes the mistake needs help too.

Authors:  A W Wu
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-18

2.  Coping with medical mistakes and errors in judgment.

Authors:  Richard M Goldberg; Gloria Kuhn; Louise B Andrew; Harold A Thomas
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  Dealing with failure: the aftermath of errors and adverse events.

Authors:  Robert L Wears; Albert W Wu
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.721

4.  The heart of darkness: the impact of perceived mistakes on physicians.

Authors:  J F Christensen; W Levinson; P M Dunn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  When bad things happen to good surgeons: reactions to adverse events.

Authors:  Shelly Luu; Shuk On Annie Leung; Carol-anne Moulton
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Burnout and career satisfaction among American surgeons.

Authors:  Tait D Shanafelt; Charles M Balch; Gerald J Bechamps; Thomas Russell; Lotte Dyrbye; Daniel Satele; Paul Collicott; Paul J Novotny; Jeff Sloan; Julie A Freischlag
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Special report: suicidal ideation among American surgeons.

Authors:  Tait D Shanafelt; Charles M Balch; Lotte Dyrbye; Gerald Bechamps; Tom Russell; Daniel Satele; Teresa Rummans; Karen Swartz; Paul J Novotny; Jeff Sloan; Michael R Oreskovich
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2011-01

8.  The Surgeon as the Second Victim? Results of the Boston Intraoperative Adverse Events Surgeons' Attitude (BISA) Study.

Authors:  Kelsey Han; Jordan D Bohnen; Thomas Peponis; Myriam Martinez; Anirudh Nandan; Daniel D Yeh; Jarone Lee; Marc Demoya; George Velmahos; Haytham M A Kaafarani
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Use of administrative data to find substandard care: validation of the complications screening program.

Authors:  S N Weingart; L I Iezzoni; R B Davis; R H Palmer; M Cahalane; M B Hamel; K Mukamal; R S Phillips; D T Davies; N J Banks
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Medical mistakes: a workshop on personal perspectives.

Authors:  R T Penson; S S Svendsen; B A Chabner; T J Lynch; W Levinson
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2001
View more
  3 in total

1.  "The captain of the ship." A qualitative investigation of surgeon identity formation.

Authors:  Samantha J Rivard; C Ann Vitous; Ana C De Roo; Michaela C Bamdad; Sara M Jafri; Mary E Byrnes; Pasithorn A Suwanabol
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.125

2.  High-risk surgery among older adults: Not-quite shared decision-making.

Authors:  Ana C De Roo; Crystal Ann Vitous; Samantha J Rivard; Michaela C Bamdad; Sara M Jafri; Mary E Byrnes; Pasithorn A Suwanabol
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 4.348

3.  Protocol of an iterative qualitative study to develop a molecular testing decision aid for shared decision-making in patients with lung cancer after surgery.

Authors:  Qiang Li; Qiuling Shi; Xing Wei; Yangjun Liu; Hongfan Yu; Wei Dai; Ding Yang; Kunpeng Zhang; Jing Sun; Wei Xu; Ruoyan Gong; Qingsong Yu; Yang Pu; Yaqin Wang; Jia Liao; Yunfei Mu; Yuanqiang Zhang; Wenhong Feng; Qi Pan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 3.006

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.