Literature DB >> 28093300

The Surgeon as the Second Victim? Results of the Boston Intraoperative Adverse Events Surgeons' Attitude (BISA) Study.

Kelsey Han1, Jordan D Bohnen1, Thomas Peponis1, Myriam Martinez1, Anirudh Nandan1, Daniel D Yeh1, Jarone Lee1, Marc Demoya1, George Velmahos1, Haytham M A Kaafarani2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An intraoperative adverse event (iAE) is often directly attributable to the surgeon's technical error and/or suboptimal intraoperative judgment. We aimed to examine the psychological impact of iAEs on surgeons as well as the surgeons' attitude about iAE reporting. STUDY
DESIGN: We conducted a web-based cross-sectional survey of all surgeons at 3 major teaching hospitals of the same university. The 29-item questionnaire was developed using a systematic closed and open approach focused on assessing the surgeons' personal account of iAE incidence, emotional response to iAEs, available support systems, and perspective about the barriers to iAE reporting.
RESULTS: The response rate was 44.8% (n = 126). Mean age of respondents was 49 years, 77% were male, and 83% performed >150 procedures/year. During the last year, 32% recalled 1 iAE, 39% recalled 2 to 5 iAEs, and 9% recalled >6 iAEs. The emotional toll of iAEs was significant, with 84% of respondents reporting a combination of anxiety (66%), guilt (60%), sadness (52%), shame/embarrassment (42%), and anger (29%). Colleagues constituted the most helpful support system (42%) rather than friends or family; a few surgeons needed psychological therapy/counseling. As for reporting, 26% preferred not to see their individual iAE rates, and 38% wanted it reported in comparison with their aggregate colleagues' rate. The most common barriers to reporting iAEs were fear of litigation (50%), lack of a standardized reporting system (49%), and absence of a clear iAE definition (48%).
CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative AEs occur often, have a significant negative impact on surgeons' well-being, and barriers to transparency are fear of litigation and absence of a well-defined reporting system. Efforts should be made to support surgeons and standardize reporting when iAEs occur.
Copyright © 2017 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28093300     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  17 in total

1.  From box ticking to the black box: the evolution of operating room safety.

Authors:  Mitchell G Goldenberg; Dean Elterman
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Ο ΒΙΟΣ ΤΗ ΧΕΙΡΟΥΡΓΙΚΗ ΑΝΑΦΥΕΤΑΙ.

Authors:  Dimitrios Linos
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Unanticipated rare adverse events and the surgeon startle response in ophthalmic surgery.

Authors:  Angela Chang; Grant A Justin; Priya M Mathews; James D Auran
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Exploring Emotional Responses After Postoperative Complications: A Qualitative Study of Practicing Surgeons.

Authors:  C Ann Vitous; Mary E Byrnes; Ana De Roo; Sara M Jafri; Pasithorn A Suwanabol
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 13.787

5.  Duration of second victim symptoms in the aftermath of a patient safety incident and association with the level of patient harm: a cross-sectional study in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Kris Vanhaecht; Deborah Seys; Loes Schouten; Luk Bruyneel; Ellen Coeckelberghs; Massimiliano Panella; Gerda Zeeman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Incidence and OR team awareness of "near-miss" and retained surgical sharps: a national survey on United States operating rooms.

Authors:  Samuel A Weprin; Dielle Meyer; Rui Li; Umberto Carbonara; Fabio Crocerossa; Fernando J Kim; Riccardo Autorino; John E Speich; Adam P Klausner
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2021-04-03

Review 7.  Risk factors and preventive strategies for unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a systematic review.

Authors:  Samuel Weprin; Fabio Crocerossa; Dielle Meyer; Kaitlyn Maddra; David Valancy; Reginald Osardu; Hae Sung Kang; Robert H Moore; Umberto Carbonara; Fernando J Kim; Riccardo Autorino
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2021-07-12

8.  Second victims in health care: current perspectives.

Authors:  Ozcan Ozeke; Vildan Ozeke; Ozlem Coskun; Isil Irem Budakoglu
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2019-08-12

9.  Interactive virtual 3D models of renal cancer patient anatomies alter partial nephrectomy surgical planning decisions and increase surgeon confidence compared to volume-rendered images.

Authors:  E R Hyde; L U Berger; N Ramachandran; A Hughes-Hallett; N P Pavithran; M G B Tran; S Ourselin; A Bex; F H Mumtaz
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 10.  The psychosocial impact of surgical complications on the operating surgeon: A scoping review.

Authors:  Manjunath Siddaiah-Subramanya; Henry To; Catherine Haigh
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-07-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.