Literature DB >> 33443650

Jumping spiders: An exceptional group for comparative cognition studies.

Samuel Aguilar-Arguello1, Ximena J Nelson2.   

Abstract

Several non-mutually exclusive hypotheses have been proposed to explain the evolution of cognition in animals. Broadly, these hypotheses fall under two categories: those that pertain to the selective pressures exerted either by sociality or by the ecological niche in which animals live. We review these ideas and then discuss why the highly visual jumping spiders (Salticidae) are excellent models for investigating how cognitive ability evolves. With few exceptions, these behaviorally complex spiders are non-social, making them ideal candidates to explore ideas pertaining to selection based on habitat complexity and selection based on predatory behavior (foraging niche hypotheses). With the exception of Antarctica, salticids are found in all habitats on Earth, ranging from very complex to barren and simple. While many species are generalist predators, a minority also have specialized predatory behavior and prey specialization on dangerous prey, which has been proposed as an explanation for advanced cognitive ability. As this large group has a diversity of habitats in which it lives, diverse predatory behavior, as well as some "social" species, we argue that salticids are ideal candidates for comparative studies to explore the myriad selection factors acting upon a group well known for their cognitive prowess, despite having miniature brains.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Categorization; Comparative cognition; Object recognition; Perception; Spatial learning

Year:  2021        PMID: 33443650     DOI: 10.3758/s13420-020-00445-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  50 in total

1.  Rearing environment affects behaviour of jumping spiders.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  Solving a novel confinement problem by spartaeine salticids that are predisposed to solve problems in the context of predation.

Authors:  Fiona R Cross; Robert R Jackson
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  The social brain hypothesis and its implications for social evolution.

Authors:  R I M Dunbar
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.533

Review 4.  Are bigger brains better?

Authors:  Lars Chittka; Jeremy Niven
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 5.  Evolutionary biology of insect learning.

Authors:  Reuven Dukas
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 19.686

6.  Neuronal mechanisms of habituation and dishabituation of the gill-withdrawal reflex in Aplysia.

Authors:  V Castellucci; H Pinsker; I Kupfermann; E R Kandel
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-03-27       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The execution of planned detours by spider-eating predators.

Authors:  Fiona R Cross; Robert R Jackson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Influence of spatial environment on maze learning in an African mole-rat.

Authors:  Lydia du Toit; Nigel C Bennett; Alecia Nickless; Martin J Whiting
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Distance assessment of detours by jumping spiders.

Authors:  Samuel Aguilar-Arguello; Daniel Gerhard; Ximena J Nelson
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 2.624

10.  Brain morphology of the threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) varies inconsistently with respect to habitat complexity: A test of the Clever Foraging Hypothesis.

Authors:  Newaz I Ahmed; Cole Thompson; Daniel I Bolnick; Yoel E Stuart
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.