Literature DB >> 26781057

The execution of planned detours by spider-eating predators.

Fiona R Cross1, Robert R Jackson2.   

Abstract

Many spiders from the salticid subfamily Spartaeinae specialize at preying on other spiders and they adopt complex strategies when targeting these dangerous prey. We tested 15 of these spider-eating spartaeine species for the capacity to plan detours ahead of time. Each trial began with the test subject on top of a tower from which it could view two boxes: one containing prey and the other not containing prey. The distance between the tower and the boxes was too far to reach by leaping and the tower sat on a platform surrounded by water. As the species studied are known to avoid water, the only way they could reach the prey without getting wet was by taking one of two circuitous walkways from the platform: one leading to the prey ('correct') and one not leading to the prey ('incorrect'). After leaving the tower, the test subject could not see the prey and sometimes it had to walk past the incorrect walkway before reaching the correct walkway. Yet all 15 species chose the correct walkway significantly more often than the incorrect walkway. We propose that these findings exemplify genuine cognition based on representation.
© 2016 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Spartaeinae; cognition; detouring; jumping spiders; planning; representation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26781057      PMCID: PMC4751061          DOI: 10.1002/jeab.189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  29 in total

1.  Representations in animal cognition: an introduction.

Authors:  C R Gallistel
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1990-11

Review 2.  Prospective cognition in animals.

Authors:  C R Raby; N S Clayton
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Are monkeys able to plan for future exchange?

Authors:  Marie Bourjade; Bernard Thierry; Josep Call; Valérie Dufour
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 4.  Behavioural evidence for mental time travel in nonhuman animals.

Authors:  Thomas Suddendorf; Michael C Corballis
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Wild chimpanzees plan their breakfast time, type, and location.

Authors:  Karline R L Janmaat; Leo Polansky; Simone Dagui Ban; Christophe Boesch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Specialised use of working memory by Portia africana, a spider-eating salticid.

Authors:  Fiona R Cross; Robert R Jackson
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  Planning for the future by western scrub-jays.

Authors:  C R Raby; D M Alexis; A Dickinson; N S Clayton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The deep phylogeny of jumping spiders (Araneae, Salticidae).

Authors:  Wayne P Maddison; Daiqin Li; Melissa Bodner; Junxia Zhang; Qingqing Liu; Fengxiang Liu
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 1.546

9.  Movements of the retinae of jumping spiders (Salticidae: dendryphantinae) in response to visual stimuli.

Authors:  M F Land
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 10.  What are the essential cognitive requirements for prospection (thinking about the future)?

Authors:  Magda Osman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-30
View more
  7 in total

1.  Representation of different exact numbers of prey by a spider-eating predator.

Authors:  Fiona R Cross; Robert R Jackson
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 2.  Jumping spiders: An exceptional group for comparative cognition studies.

Authors:  Samuel Aguilar-Arguello; Ximena J Nelson
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Ontogenetic shift in plant-related cognitive specialization by a mosquito-eating predator.

Authors:  Georgina E Carvell; Robert R Jackson; Fiona R Cross
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 4.  The detour paradigm in animal cognition.

Authors:  Can Kabadayi; Katarzyna Bobrowicz; Mathias Osvath
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Distance assessment of detours by jumping spiders.

Authors:  Samuel Aguilar-Arguello; Daniel Gerhard; Ximena J Nelson
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 2.624

6.  Need for speed: Short lifespan selects for increased learning ability.

Authors:  Jannis Liedtke; Lutz Fromhage
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Debunking a myth: plant consciousness.

Authors:  Jon Mallatt; Michael R Blatt; Andreas Draguhn; David G Robinson; Lincoln Taiz
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 3.356

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.