Literature DB >> 33443539

Socioeconomic Disparities in Patient Use of Telehealth During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Surge.

Ilaaf Darrat1, Samantha Tam1, Marwan Boulis1, Amy M Williams1.   

Abstract

Importance: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic required the rapid transition to telehealth with the aim of providing patients with medical access and supporting clinicians while abiding by the stay-at-home orders. Objective: To assess demographic and socioeconomic factors associated with patient participation in telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included all pediatric and adult patient encounters at the Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery in a tertiary care, academic, multisubspecialty, multisite practice located in an early hot spot for the COVID-19 pandemic from March 17 to May 1, 2020. Encounters included completed synchronous virtual, telephone, and in-person visits as well as visit no-shows. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patient demographic characteristics, insurance status, and 2010 Census block level data as a proxy for socioeconomic status were extracted. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were created for patient-level comparisons.
Results: Of the 1162 patients (604 females [52.0%]; median age, 55 [range, 0-97] years) included, 990 completed visits; of these, 437 (44.1%) completed a virtual visit. After multivariate adjustment, females (odds ratio [OR], 1.71; 95% CI, 1.11-2.63) and patients with preferred provider organization insurance (OR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.40-5.20) were more likely to complete a virtual visit compared with a telephone visit. Increasing age (OR per year, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.98-0.99) and being in the lowest median household income quartile (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.42-0.86) were associated with lower odds of completing a virtual visit overall. Those patients within the second (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.28-0.99) and lowest (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.17-0.62) quartiles of median household income by census block and those with Medicaid, no insurance, or other public insurance (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.23-0.94) were more likely to complete a telephone visit. Finally, being within the lower 2 quartiles of proportion being married (OR for third quartile, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.29-0.86]; OR for lowest quartile, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.23-0.67]) was associated with higher likelihood of a no-show visit. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that age, sex, median household income, insurance status, and marital status are associated with patient participation in telehealth. These findings identify vulnerable patient populations who may not engage with telehealth, yet still require medical care in a changing health care delivery landscape.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33443539      PMCID: PMC7809608          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.5161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2168-6181            Impact factor:   6.223


  29 in total

Review 1.  Impact of Telehealth Care among Adults Living with Type 2 Diabetes in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Natalie Robson; Hassan Hosseinzadeh
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Recommendations for building telemental health relationships with youth: A systematic review and resource for clinicians.

Authors:  Ruben G Martinez; Ilana Seager van Dyk; Juliet L Kroll; Natacha D Emerson; Brenda Bursch
Journal:  Evid Based Pract Child Adolesc Ment Health       Date:  2021-10-22

3.  "It was surprisingly equivalent to the appointment I had in person": Advantages and disadvantages of synchronous telehealth for delivering primary care for autistic adults.

Authors:  Lauren Harris; Daniel Gilmore; Christopher Hanks; Daniel Coury; Susan Moffatt-Bruce; Jennifer H Garvin; Brittany N Hand
Journal:  Autism       Date:  2021-11-30

Review 4.  A Review of Disparities in Cardiac Rehabilitation: EVIDENCE, DRIVERS, AND SOLUTIONS.

Authors:  Lena Mathews; LaPrincess C Brewer
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.081

Review 5.  Patients, Families, and Communities COVID-19 Impact Assessment: Lessons Learned and Compelling Needs.

Authors:  Frederick Isasi; Mary D Naylor; David Skorton; David C Grabowski; Sandra Hernández; Valerie Montgomery Rice
Journal:  NAM Perspect       Date:  2021-11-29

Review 6.  Sociotechnical Factors Affecting Patients' Adoption of Mobile Health Tools: Systematic Literature Review and Narrative Synthesis.

Authors:  Christine Jacob; Emre Sezgin; Antonio Sanchez-Vazquez; Chris Ivory
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.947

7.  Inequity in Telemedicine Use Among Patients with Cancer in the Deep South During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Connie C Shao; M Chandler McLeod; Lauren T Gleason; Isabel C Dos Santos Marques; Daniel I Chu; Eric L Wallace; Mona N Fouad; Sushanth Reddy
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 5.837

8.  Telehealth utilisation in residential aged care facilities during the COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective cohort study in Australian general practice.

Authors:  Zhaoli Dai; Gorkem Sezgin; Julie Li; Guilherme S Franco; Precious McGuire; Shirmilla Datta; Christopher Pearce; Adam McLeod; Andrew Georgiou
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 6.344

9.  Implementation and early experience of a pediatric electrophysiology telehealth program.

Authors:  Jonathan Schweber; Lisa Roelle; Juliana Ocasio; Aarti S Dalal; Nathan Miller; George F Van Hare; Jennifer N Avari Silva
Journal:  Cardiovasc Digit Health J       Date:  2022-01-28

10.  How Providers in Child Neurology Transitioned to Telehealth During COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Jennifer M Bain; Codi-Ann Dyer; Megan Galvin; Sylvie Goldman; Jay Selman; Wendy G Silver; Sarah E Tom
Journal:  Child Neurol Open       Date:  2021-07-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.