Literature DB >> 33442519

Co-culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (VS3) and Pichia stipitis (NCIM 3498) enhances bioethanol yield from concentrated Prosopis juliflora hydrolysate.

Shaik Naseeruddin1, Suseelendra Desai2, L Venkateswar Rao1.   

Abstract

Biphasic acid hydrolysates and enzymatic hydrolysates from carbohydrate-rich Prosopis juliflora, an invasive perennial deciduous shrub of semi-arid regions, were used for bioethanol production. Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pichia stipitis were used for fermentation of hexoses and pentoses. P. juliflora acid hydrolysate with an initial sugar concentration of 18.70 ± 0.16 g/L was concentrated to 33.59 ± 0.52 g/L by vacuum distillation. The concentrated hydrolysate was pretreated and fermented by mono- and co-culture methods either singly or in combination with enzyme hydrolysate and ethanol yields were compared. Monoculture with S. cerevisiae (VS3) and S. cerevisiae (NCIM3455) yielded maximum ethanol of 36.6 ± 1.83 g/L and 37.1 ± 1.86 g/L with a fermentation efficiency of 83.94 ± 4.20% and 84.20 ± 4.21%, respectively, after 36 h of fermentation. The ethanol yield obtained was 0.428 ± 0.02 g/g substrate and 0.429 ± 0.02 g/g substrate with a productivity of 1.017 ± 0.051 g/L/hand 1.031 ± 0.052 g/L/h, respectively. P. stipitis (NCIM3498) yielded maximum ethanol of 24 g/L with ethanol yield of 0.455 ± 0.02 g/g substrate and a productivity of 1.004 ± 0.050 g/L/h after 24 h of fermentation. With concentrated acid hydrolysate as substrate, S. cerevisiae (VS3) produced ethanol of 8.52 ± 0.43 g/L, whereas S. cerevisiae (NCIM3455) produced 5.96 ± 0.30 g/L of ethanol. P.stipitis (NCIM3498) produced 4.52 ± 0.23 g/L of ethanol by utilizing 14.66 ± 0.87 g/L of sugars. Co-culture with S. cerevisiae (VS3) addition after 18 h of addition of P. stipitis (NCIM3498) to the mixture of concentrated acid hydrolysate and enzyme hydrolysate produced 13.86 ± 0.47 g/L of ethanol with fermentation efficiency, ethanol yield and productivity of 87.54 ± 0.54%, 0.446 ± 2.36 g/g substrate and 0.385 ± 0.014 g/L/h, respectively. Hence, it is concluded that co-culture with S. cerevisiae and P. stipitis is feasible, further scaling up of fermentation of P. juliflora substrate for bioethanol production. © King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioethanol; Co-culture; Ethanol yield; Fermentation efficiency; Lignocellulose; Prosopis juliflora

Year:  2021        PMID: 33442519      PMCID: PMC7779385          DOI: 10.1007/s13205-020-02595-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  3 Biotech        ISSN: 2190-5738            Impact factor:   2.406


  18 in total

1.  Bioconversion of Saccharum spontaneum (wild sugarcane) hemicellulosic hydrolysate into ethanol by mono and co-cultures of Pichia stipitis NCIM3498 and thermotolerant Saccharomyces cerevisiae-VS₃.

Authors:  Anuj K Chandel; Om V Singh; M Lakshmi Narasu; L Venkateswar Rao
Journal:  N Biotechnol       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 5.079

2.  Direct bioethanol production from brown macroalgae by co-culture of two engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains.

Authors:  Yusuke Sasaki; Toshiyuki Takagi; Keisuke Motone; Toshiyuki Shibata; Kouichi Kuroda; Mitsuyoshi Ueda
Journal:  Biosci Biotechnol Biochem       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 2.043

3.  Detoxification of sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate improves ethanol production by Candida shehatae NCIM 3501.

Authors:  Anuj Kumar Chandel; Rajeev Kumar Kapoor; Ajay Singh; Ramesh Chander Kuhad
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 9.642

Review 4.  Ethanol fermentation from biomass resources: current state and prospects.

Authors:  Yan Lin; Shuzo Tanaka
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 5.  Engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for the efficient co-utilization of glucose and xylose.

Authors:  Jin Hou; Chenxi Qiu; Yu Shen; Hongxing Li; Xiaoming Bao
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  Strain improvement of thermotolerant Saccharomyces cerevisiae VS strain for better utilization of lignocellulosic substrates.

Authors:  C Pasha; R C Kuhad; L Venkateswar Rao
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.772

7.  Ethanogenic fermentation of co-cultures of Candida shehatae HM 52.2 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae ICV D254 in synthetic medium and rice hull hydrolysate.

Authors:  Lilian Raquel Hickert; Fernanda da Cunha-Pereira; Priscila Brasil de Souza-Cruz; Carlos Augusto Rosa; Marco Antônio Záchia Ayub
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 9.642

8.  Separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) of Prosopis juliflora, a woody substrate, for the production of cellulosic ethanol by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pichia stipitis-NCIM 3498.

Authors:  Rishi Gupta; Krishna Kant Sharma; Ramesh Chander Kuhad
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 9.642

9.  Selection of the best chemical pretreatment for lignocellulosic substrate Prosopis juliflora.

Authors:  Shaik Naseeruddin; K Srilekha Yadav; L Sateesh; Ananth Manikyam; Suseelendra Desai; L Venkateswar Rao
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 9.642

10.  Ethanol production from sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate using Pichia stipitis.

Authors:  Larissa Canilha; Walter Carvalho; Maria das Graças de Almeida Felipe; João Batista de Almeida e Silva; Marco Giulietti
Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol       Date:  2009-10-04       Impact factor: 2.926

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.