Towards Personalized Management of Sarcopenia in COPD.

The awareness of the presence and consequences of sarcopenia has significantly increased over the past decade. Sarcopenia is defined as gradual loss of muscle mass and strength and ultimately loss of physical performance associated with aging and chronic disease. The prevalence of sarcopenia is higher in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) compared to age-matched controls. Current literature suggests that next to physical inactivity, COPD-specific alterations in physiological processes contribute to accelerated development of sarcopenia. Sarcopenia in COPD can be assessed according to current guidelines, but during physical performance testing, ventilatory limitation should be considered. Treatment of muscle impairment can halt or even reverse sarcopenia, despite respiratory impairment. Exercise training and protein supplementation are currently at the basis of sarcopenia treatment. Furthermore, effective current and new interventions targeting the pulmonary system (eg, smoking cessation, bronchodilators and lung volume reduction surgery) may also facilitate muscle maintenance. Better understanding of disease-specific pathophysiological mechanisms involved in the accelerated development of sarcopenia in COPD will provide new leads to refine nutritional, exercise and physical activity interventions and develop pharmacological co-interventions.

Introduction

Over the past decade, there has been increasing awareness of the prevalence and consequences of sarcopenia. The term sarcopenia, derived from the Greek words “sarx” (flesh) and “penia” (poverty) was introduced in 1989 by Rosenberg to describe generalized and progressive loss of muscle mass and function with advancing age.1 In that same time period, Schols et al showed that low muscle mass is also highly prevalent in patients with advanced Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).2 While loss of muscle mass in COPD was initially studied in the context of cachexia, these early studies already showed that low muscle mass may also occur in weight stable normal to overweight COPD patients, adversely affecting physical performance.2,3

More recently, the prevalence of sarcopenia showed to be higher in COPD patients compared to age-matched controls, implying more pronounced contribution of lifestyle factors, for example, inactivity and disease-specific factors to its accelerated development.4,5 Whereas treatment of respiratory impairment in COPD is largely symptomatic, non-pharmacological interventions can halt progression or even reverse the loss of muscle mass and function.6,7 Therefore, treatment of sarcopenia can contribute to alleviate disease burden and improve quality of life in COPD patients.

In this review, we provide a concise overview of the implications of sarcopenia for COPD patients, its clinical assessment and the latest evidence on treatment efficacy and feasibility, while taking limitations and opportunities imposed by COPD pathology into consideration.

Definition of Sarcopenia

Over the past decade, several international committees and working groups have published consensus statements on the definition and criteria of sarcopenia. These different definitions all consider a combination of low muscle mass and function as the core components of sarcopenia; because of difference in ethnicity, genetics and body size, different cut-off points have however been reported, which may contribute to the heterogeneity in reported prevalence of sarcopenia.8–12 In 2019, the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) published an updated version of their previous consensus statement,13 providing an operational definition from probable sarcopenia with low muscle strength, to confirmed sarcopenia with low muscle mass and eventually severe sarcopenia with low muscle mass, strength and physical performance present. Furthermore, a distinction between primary sarcopenia (solely age-related) and secondary sarcopenia (caused by additional factors other than aging, including COPD) was proposed.11 In 2019 the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) also published a consensus update on sarcopenia diagnosis and treatment, but retained their original definition of sarcopenia as “age-related loss of skeletal muscle mass plus loss of muscle strength and/or reduced physical performance”.12 Furthermore, AWGS 2019 introduced the terms “possible sarcopenia”, defined as low muscle strength with or without reduced physical performance, and “severe sarcopenia” defined by low muscle mass, strength and physical performance, allowing a distinction in severity of sarcopenia. Each of these definitions considers muscle mass and function at a certain point in time in comparison to reference values to define a sarcopenic state. In contrast, in the definitions of cachexia, an involuntary loss of lean tissue mass within a set time period is at the core.14–16 Muscle atrophy (state) and muscle mass loss (process) are overlapping features of both conditions.

Prevalence of Sarcopenia in COPD

The reported numbers for sarcopenia in the general population vary from 4.4% to 27.5%,17,18 not only because of the different definitions and cutoff points used, but also depending on the studied population. Sarcopenia prevalence is lowest in community-based populations and the highest in nursing home populations.4,8,19 A meta-analysis from 2017 by Shafiee et al20 reported an overall estimated prevalence of sarcopenia of 10%, whereas the Rotterdam Study by Trajanoska et al17 from 2018 only reported a prevalence of 4.4% in a general community population. The meta-analysis demonstrated an influence of assessment methods (some being addressed below) used on sarcopenia prevalence, which could (partly) explain the heterogeneity of results between these two studies, next to different definitions (based on different parameters and different cut-offs) of sarcopenia over time. To reduce heterogeneity between studies, one universal consensus definition would therefore be preferable. The Rotterdam study showed that the prevalence of COPD in subjects with sarcopenia was higher than in the non-sarcopenic population. In line, a recent meta-analysis by Benz et al reported a higher prevalence of sarcopenia in COPD patients than in non-COPD patients with a 21.6% pooled prevalence of sarcopenia in COPD. They also demonstrated that prevalence depends on the selected population and reported a prevalence range from 8% in community based populations to 63% in nursing home populations.4 Lastly, the most recent meta-analysis reported a pooled prevalence of sarcopenia in COPD patients of 27.5% and a significantly higher prevalence in more severe COPD stages.18 Despite considerable heterogeneity between studies, these results all point towards a higher prevalence of sarcopenia in COPD than in the general population.

Consequences of Sarcopenia

Low fat-free mass (FFM) and sarcopenia proved independent predictors of both all-cause mortality and specific COPD-related mortality.21–23 Reduced muscle strength and impaired physical performance are predictors of poor health-related quality of life, more and longer hospital stays and higher mortality in both the general population as well as in COPD patients specifically.24,25 Compared to the general population, increased incidence of falls and fractures has been reported in COPD patients.26,27 Additionally, in COPD the presence of sarcopenia increased the risk for osteopenia and osteoporosis, which complies with the association of increased risk of falls and fractures in primary sarcopenia.28 Experienced quality of life measured by the Sarcopenia and Quality of Life (SarQOL) questionnaire,29,30 exercise capacity and physical activity levels were limited in both sarcopenic and COPD patients, with dyspnea as an additional impairing factor in COPD.4,5,31 Physical inactivity resulted in further deconditioning and deterioration of muscle function,32–34 and can therefore be considered both a cause and a consequence of sarcopenia. Acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) during which various catabolic triggers converge, may accelerate the development or progress of sarcopenia. Indeed, recently, a sarcopenia prevalence of 48% was demonstrated within a COPD population with frequent AECOPD,35 which is significantly higher than the most recent reported pooled prevalence of 27.5% in COPD patients.18

Pathophysiology of Sarcopenia

The underlying pathophysiologic process of sarcopenia is complex and not yet completely understood. Multiple determinants and risk factors trigger (patho)physiological mechanisms that affect skeletal muscle homeostasis, resulting in reduced muscle mass and strength.36,37 An in-depth review of these exact processes and mechanisms is beyond the scope of this review, but the processes relevant to sarcopenia in COPD are briefly discussed and visualized in Figure 1.

Figure 1

Pathophysiology of sarcopenia in COPD: Age and COPD can be considered as initial determinants of disease specific and shared triggers (in blue) that initiate independent and interrelated pathophysiological mechanisms through alterations of multiple muscle cell signaling pathways (which have been discussed extensively by other authors such as Langen et al36 and Abdulai et al37). Eventually these converge on and deregulate three key processes (in orange) responsible for muscle homeostasis, leading to sarcopenia.

A gradual decline of muscle mass and strength starts around the age of 50 and progresses with advancing age, eventually leading to primary sarcopenia.33 Furthermore, age is one of the major risk factors for chronic diseases such as COPD. With several hallmarks of aging being already present in skeletal muscle of COPD patients, including cellular senescence38 and impaired proteostasis,39,40 this may suggest that sarcopenia in COPD could be a manifestation of accelerated aging.

With advancing age, there is (progressive) neuromuscular junction loss, ie, a progressive denervation of motor units. The consequential loss of communication between the nervous and muscular system, eventually contributes to loss of muscle mass and strength, particularly in type II muscle fibers.32–34,41 Furthermore, aging is accompanied by alterations in hormonal status. Age-related decreases in anabolic hormones such as growth hormone, testosterone, thyroid hormone and insulin-like growth factor have been well established and are known to contribute to loss of muscle mass and strength.32 Furthermore, increased catabolic signaling through increased inflammation has long been implicated in muscle atrophy and cachexia.5,36 Both aging and COPD are associated with chronically elevated levels of inflammatory cytokines in the circulatory system.5 Particularly in COPD, increased levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin (IL)1 and IL-6 have been reported, and these cytokines have been shown to stimulate muscle protein degradation, inhibit protein synthesis as well as myogenesis in preclinical models related to COPD pathology.36,42,43 Recently, it was demonstrated that sarcopenia was also associated with levels of systemic inflammation in COPD.44 Nevertheless, to what extent low-grade systemic inflammation actually contributes to muscle wasting in stable COPD remains contradictory.45–47 In addition, systemic inflammation spikes during acute exacerbations of COPD and may predominantly accelerate muscle loss acutely.5,31,36,42 Moreover, in an attempt to control (mainly) local pulmonary inflammation during acute exacerbations, corticosteroid treatment is an important therapeutic cornerstone in COPD. However, administration of systemic corticosteroids has been demonstrated to affect muscle mass and consequently muscle strength.48–50 The extent of these negative effects vary depending on type of steroid chosen51 and are also dose-dependent.52,53

Furthermore, COPD and aging are both associated with malnutrition, or the risk thereof.54,55 A deficit in energy intake results in (involuntary) weight loss and can contribute to the loss of muscle mass. In addition, specific deficits in vitamins and other micronutrients such as vitamin D are also correlated to muscle mass and function.33,54 Protein intake specifically is relevant in the maintenance of muscle mass. The Health ABC study demonstrated that protein intake relates to lean mass in elderly, with higher protein intake attenuating loss of lean mass over time.56

Physical inactivity at any age is an important trigger loss of muscle loss, as inactivity results in a reduced stimulation of the corresponding motor units, triggering disuse-atrophy.32,34 Aging as well as COPD is associated with a more sedentary lifestyle and a reduced level of physical activity. In COPD (exertional) dyspnea is the main symptom limiting the patients’ activity levels. Reduced chest wall compliance with consequent dynamic hyperinflation and an increased work of breathing are additional, COPD specific, contributors to a limited exercise tolerance and determinants of limited physical activity.4,31 Furthermore, in some, but not all, COPD patients dyspnea is preceded or accompanied by (exertional) hypoxia. Hypoxic exposure is sufficient to induce muscle atrophy57 and at the cellular level, severe hypoxia results in down-regulation of energy-consuming processes, such as protein synthesis.36 Moreover, hypoxia has been shown to induce inflammatory responses and increase oxidative stress which may indirectly impact on muscle protein turnover and contribute to muscle wasting.36 Recently, Debevec et al demonstrated that hypoxemia, independent of age and particularly in combination with inactivity, aggravates muscle wasting.58

Each of these putative triggers of sarcopenia may act indirectly, eg, through altering the levels of key growth factors involved in muscle mass regulation or other signaling pathways, that have been comprehensively described and evaluated by other authors (such as Langen et al36 and Abdulai et al37).

Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) is considered essential for protein synthesis and inhibitory of protein degradation while myostatin (MSTN) is a powerful negative regulator of protein synthesis and inhibits satellite cell proliferation which is essential for muscle growth and repair, ie, its regenerative capacity.36,59,60 During acute exacerbations, IGF1 levels are decreased and correspond with lower muscle mass in COPD patients.36 Furthermore, MSTN levels are inversely correlated to muscle mass in COPD, and circulating MSTN levels are increased in sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic COPD patients compared to controls, suggesting MSTN elevation may precede sarcopenia.5,59,61 A balance in protein turnover is essential for maintenance of muscle mass and an imbalance towards degradation results in reduced protein accretion. Increased protein turnover on the whole body level has been reported in COPD patients, as well as increased muscle protein degradation and muscle protein synthesis signaling.36,59 Lastly, a reduced oxidative capacity, ie, the rate at which nutrients can be oxidized in mitochondria to produce energy, influences muscle quality and function. Mitochondria are sensitive to protein and DNA damage, which worsens with age and chronic disease, leading to mitochondrial breakdown (mitophagy) and rendering the muscle less energy efficient.60,62 Skeletal muscle of COPD patients is indeed characterized by a loss of oxidative capacity reflected by both a loss of mitochondrial bulk and function as well as by a proportional shift from oxidative type I to glycolytic type II muscle fibers.60,63 This reduced proportion of oxidative type I fibers but also a reduction of oxidative enzyme activity results in a reduced oxidative capacity which has been associated with reduced muscle endurance in COPD patients.5 Interestingly, more recently, Van de Bool et al demonstrated a more pronounced loss of type I fibers in sarcopenic COPD patients than in non-sarcopenic COPD patients.64 Additionally, the remaining type II fibers are generally more sensitive to atrophy related triggers, implying a link between muscle quality and muscle quantity and a possible acceleration of muscle wasting by the loss of oxidative capacity.60,64

Assessment

In clinical practice, sarcopenia may only become obvious when serious exercise impairment develops, whereas early recognition may lead to timely and personalized treatment, resulting in improved clinical outcome. Depending on the setting and the patients’ clinical condition, either a thorough assessment of all sarcopenia domains; muscle mass, strength and physical performance, or a shorter assessment is indicated.11

Screening

The SARC-F is a relatively simple, easily accessible five-item questionnaire that is currently the most popular of four existing screening tools for sarcopenia; it is also recommended by the EWGSOP2 as a screening tool for probable sarcopenia in community health care and other clinical settings.11,65 With its low sensitivity but high specificity, the SARC-F will most likely detect severe cases rather than low-risk patients.66,67 To increase its sensitivity, Barbosa-Silva et al68 added calf circumference to the SARC-F questionnaire, resulting in the SARC-CalF screening tool. A recent comparative study found that the SARC-CalF was the optimal choice for screening sarcopenia in community dwelling-older adults.65 Following this recent literature, the AWGS 2019 recommends the use of the SARC-CalF in their screening protocol.12

Recently the serum creatinine (Cr)/serum cystatin C (CysC) ratio, also called the sarcopenia index, has been introduced.69 Since Cr reflects muscle mass and CysC does not, the Cr/CysC ratio has been proposed as a surrogate marker for sarcopenia. A correlation between Cr/CysC ratio with muscle mass69 and adverse COPD-related outcomes70 has been demonstrated. Moreover, Hirai et al71 demonstrated that the Cr/CysC may serve as a surrogate marker for sarcopenia in COPD, with a cut-off of 0.71 in male patients. However, Tang et al72 recently suggested that the Cr/CysC ratio could only serve as a potentially valuable biomarker to predict adverse outcomes in elderly, but not necessarily as a surrogate marker for sarcopenia, since other factors, such as chronic kidney disease,73 a frequent comorbidity in COPD patients,74 might also influence serum Cr levels. Therefore, although serum Cr and CysC can be easily determined in clinical practice, better validation is required before this can be applied in clinical practice.72

In the search for reliable biomarkers to reflect muscle damage, urinary titin, a sarcomeric protein that is excreted in urine, has been investigated and was found to correlate with blood markers of muscle damage.75 More recently, elevated levels of urinary titin were demonstrated to correlate with rectus femoris muscle atrophy in intensive care patients.76 These studies suggest that urinary titin might be a useful, non-invasive potential biomarker for sarcopenia, but more research and validation is still required.

Muscle Mass

Whole body Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is usually considered as the gold standard for muscle mass assessment. MRI is a non-invasive method that does not require radiation exposure, but is limited by its need for highly trained operating personnel, lack of portability, equipment costs, availability and its long measurement duration.4,77 Recently, however, fat-referenced MRI has been introduced as a method to assess body composition. This six-minute MRI scanning protocol provides quantitative fat-referenced images and is significantly quicker than traditional whole-body MRI scanning. It uses a supervised automated segmentation tool that facilitates efficient segmenting of different body compartments, further reducing the processing time of analyzing a whole body data set.78 Rapid MRI protocols proved to accurately quantify whole body skeletal muscle volume and body composition.78–80 Besides whole-body assessment, single slice MRI at the third lumbar vertebrae (L3) and mid-thigh level have been proposed as a proxy for whole-body muscle mass. Schweitzer et al found that a single slice MRI at the L3 level was the optimal site to assess total skeletal muscle mass and adipose tissue in healthy, middle-aged subjects.81 Furthermore, a single MRI image at the mid-femur level has also shown good estimation of skeletal muscle mass and correlations with clinical sarcopenia criteria.82

Computed Tomography (CT) provides a three-dimensional, high-resolution image of the scanned area. CT scanning is an accurate way to measure muscle mass, but is limited by its consequential radiation exposure, equipment costs, lack of portability and need for trained operating personnel.78 The radiation exposure accompanying CT scans makes whole-body CT to assess muscle mass less favorable. Nevertheless, because chest CT scanning is increasingly considered in staging and follow-up of COPD, it provides the possibility of opportunistic imaging and the use of single-slice analysis to assess muscle mass.83 Cross-sectional imaging of the psoas muscle in the lumbar spine region, all abdominal muscles on the lumbar spine level or at the mid-thigh level are the most commonly used methods to assess muscle mass through CT scanning, with a preference for imaging at the lumbar spine level over thigh muscle imaging.84 When measuring CT-derived skeletal muscle mass, the L3 vertebra level is the most commonly used and considered as reference method of cross-sectional analysis of skeletal muscle.85,86 However, most chest-CTs as obtained in regular COPD care, do not reach beyond the first lumbar level (L1), leaving the question if CT-derived pectoralis muscle area, erector spinae muscle area or muscle area at the L1 level can serve as an alternative. In a study by McDonald et al CT-derived pectoralis muscle area showed to be associated with COPD disease severity and to provide information on COPD morbidity.87 Tanimura et al later demonstrated that CT-derived erector spinae muscle area is correlated with clinical parameters of COPD and all-cause mortality,88 Furthermore, Sanders et al showed that muscle mass at L1 can substitute the L3 level assessment, but pectoralis muscle to a lesser extent.85 Consensus on the exact cut-off points that should be used when determining muscle cross-sectional area are yet to be determined, as current cut-off points vary between authors.86

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is another commonly used imaging method to assess body composition as it allows for lean mass, fat mass and bone mineral content measurements.84 This method is non-invasive, quick to perform and relatively less expensive than MRI or CT. It also has significantly lower radiation exposures compared to CT scans.77 Whilst DXA proved to estimate muscle mass reasonably well, it is however also known that different brands and different patient circumstances (like hydration status, height and weight) introduce variability, which complicates comparison of data.11,77,89 In regular care of COPD patients, DXA might be favorable since it not only assesses body composition, but also provides opportunity to screen for osteoporosis.64 Combined screening is convenient, since besides sarcopenia, osteoporosis is a prevalent comorbidity amongst COPD patients.90 Recently, Ofenheimer et al published DXA-specific age and sex-related reference values for body composition parameters.91

Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) estimates total body water based on whole-body electrical conductivity and uses a conversion equation to estimate fat mass and fat-free mass.11 Because of its portability and affordability, BIA might have some clinically relevant advantages over DXA scan. However, BIA measurements are highly sensitive to patient conditions such as hydration status and fasting versus fed conditions, which contributes to the reported inconsistent accuracy of the method.89,92 To minimize discrepancies between measurements, specific conversion equations and reference values for specific populations, including COPD patients and elderly, have been developed.11,93 Furthermore, BIA reference values may also need to be corrected for height, weight or BMI as published by Franssen et al94 and Lee et al.95

Anthropometric measures such as calf circumference or mid-arm muscle circumference are possibly the most accessible, affordable and portable manners of muscle mass assessment. Calf circumference (cut-off point <31 cm) has been shown to reflect health and nutritional status and predict performance and survival in older people.96 Training is required to properly assess anthropometrics, but even after training, they have low precision in obese subjects and older subjects.92 Therefore, as advised by EWGSOP2, they can be used as a diagnostic proxy in settings where no other methods are available.11

Muscle Strength

Quadriceps strength, the maximal contraction force that can be produced, measured by a leg dynamometer, is a reliable method to assess lower limb muscle strength.5 Isometric quadriceps strength measurements proved to predict mortality5 and to have a high test-re-test reliability and to be responsive to exercise training in COPD patients.97 There is no universal cut-off for weak quadriceps strength, but Canavan et al determined clinically relevant cut-off points for isometric maximal voluntary force normalized to heigth squared as 8.30 kg/m2 for men and 5.99 kg/m2 for women, using a hydraulic measurement.98 The hydraulic dynamometers that reliably assess leg muscle strength are not portable and could therefore limit clinical applicability. A hand-held dynamometer is portable and a feasible proxy in clinical settings, however it has been demonstrated that hand-held measurement is less accurate than traditional, hydraulic measurement methods.99

Handgrip strength measurement, measured by a calibrated dynamometer, is a simple, inexpensive and very portable method of assessing muscle strength and therefore a valuable surrogate for more complicated or less portable measures of limb muscle strength such as quadriceps strength.5,11,100 Handgrip strength carries limited to no ventilatory load and is therefore also feasible in more severe COPD disease stages. This easy to use, portable tool is advised for routine use, both in hospital as in community health-care settings and has been validated in COPD patients.101 Exact cut-off values for low handgrip strength vary between studies and are dependent of appropriate reference populations. Gender, age and height specific cut-off values were published by Spruit et al,102 whereas gender specific cut-off points have been proposed by EWGSOP2: <27 kg for men and <16 kg for women, and AWGS 2019: <28 kg for men and <18 kg for women.11,12,103–105

The chair stand test can assess both leg muscle strength and functionality, since getting up from a chair reflects common daily activity. The test measures the amount of time a patient needs to rise five times from seated position, without using their arms. A test-time of more than 17 seconds for five rises was found to identify a high risk of functional limitation within the Health ABC study.106 However, the AWGS 2019 proposes a cut of point of >12 seconds as this correlates with their definition of impaired gait speed.12 Recently, a cut-off of 10.88 seconds was found to have good sensitivity and specificity for sarcopenia screening in COPD patients specifically.107 The chair stand test proved reliable in COPD patients, correlates with exercise capacity, quadriceps strength, and is responsive to rehabilitation in COPD.11,108 Because the test requires limited space and equipment, it is feasible in most health care and research settings.

Physical Performance

Low gait speed is used as a diagnostic measure for sarcopenia, but definition of low gait speed ranges from <0.8m/s (EWGSOP2)11 to <1m/s (AWGS 2019)12 between authors and diagnostic criteria. Low gait speed proved to be prognostic of poor physical performance, adverse outcomes like disability, cognitive impairment, falls and mortality.9,11 Combined with assessment of handgrip strength, it proved to be sensitive and specific as a proxy for the “frailty phenotype”.109 Assessment of gait speed requires a flat floor where a subjects time to walk 4 meters can be timed (either manually or instrumentally with sensors). This makes it feasible for almost all care and research settings. In COPD patients, gait speed is responsive to pulmonary rehabilitation, with greatest responsiveness in poorly functioning, frail patients for whom longer tests are more difficult to perform.110 For standardization purposes, a single cut off point of <0.8m/s, in accordance with the EWGSOP2 is suggested.

The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) consists of gait speed, a balance test and a chair stand test. This short (approximately 10 minute) test battery has a maximum score of 12 points. A meta-analysis by Pavasini et al111 demonstrated SPPB scores of 7–9 to predict increased all-cause mortality. EWGSOP 2 defines a score of <8 poor physical performance whilst AWGS 2019 defines a score of <9 impaired11,77 and even more recently, a score of <10 on the SPPB was proposed as a screening tool for sarcopenia in COPD patients.107

The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test times how long it takes patients getting up from a chair, walk to a 3 m away marker, turn, walk back and sit down again.11 Time needed to complete the test increases with age, cut-off values of 8.1–11.3 seconds, depending on age have been reported.112 However, as an age independent cut-off a time of >10 seconds has also been reported.95 The TUG test proved to be valid and responsive in COPD patients and was not associated with airflow limitation.113 Worse performance on the test is indicative for poor health outcomes (functional dependency, mortality) and increases the chance for COPD patients to present with sarcopenia.95,114–116 The limited space and materials required to perform the test make it feasible in most health-care settings.

The 6-minute walk test is commonly used to objectively assess functional capacity (for rehabilitation) in COPD patients. It requires patients to walk as far as possible along a stretched course for 6 minutes and has a good reliability in COPD patients.117 The 6-min walk test (cut-off <350 m) predicts mortality and morbidity in COPD patients and can therefore be used to stratify patients to functional capacity.118,119 It does not require specialized equipment, but does need a 30 meters long corridor, which might make it more feasible in research settings than in everyday clinical assessment.

Interventions

As previously discussed, the pathological processes of sarcopenia and COPD are interconnected. An integrated approach in the management of both conditions, targeting their underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, would thus be preferable. We will therefore discuss intervention modalities primarily targeting sarcopenia in COPD patients, as well as therapeutic interventions primarily targeting COPD lung pathology that also reported effects on sarcopenia measures.

Interventions Primarily Targeting Sarcopenia in COPD

Exercise Training

Physical activity and exercise training are key in maintaining muscle mass and strength. Therefore, targeted exercise training is the hallmark of sarcopenia treatment as well as in pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programs offered to COPD patients.120 The efficacy of PR in relieving dyspnea and fatigue in COPD has been convincingly demonstrated over the years, however exact composition of PR programs varies widely and the essential components, optimal intensity and duration of the exercise training remain to be determined and personalized.121 Jones et al demonstrated that the presence of sarcopenia in COPD does not affect the response to PR and in some patients PR might lead to a resolution of sarcopenia.7

General principles of exercise training are no different in COPD patients from healthy controls or even athletes, although the physiological response might be altered in COPD patients.5,122 Aerobic exercise or endurance training in COPD patients specifically improves exercise tolerance, breathlessness, exercise induced hyperinflation and stimulates a muscle fiber shift back to more oxidative type I fibers, improving mitochondrial capacity and thus efficiency.123–125 Interval training is a variation to continuous endurance training, with short periods of high-intensity exercise alternated with periods of lower intensity or rest. This might be a valuable alternative for patients who have difficulty tolerating longer periods of continuous exercise or achieving the targeted intensity because of dyspnea or leg muscle fatigue.5 Interval training compared to continuous exercise resulted in lower levels of breathlessness and less dynamic hyperinflation in COPD patients,121,126 whilst it proved to be just as effective as endurance training in improving exercise tolerance.124 Additionally, progressive strength or resistance training relies on progressively heavy resistance counteracting muscular contraction. It is a well-established method to improve skeletal muscle mass and strength, with similar improvements demonstrated in COPD patients compared to healthy controls.123,127 Resistance training consistently increased muscle mass, and was more effective in counteracting muscle atrophy than endurance training in COPD.122 Therefore, a combination of both endurance or interval training and resistance training, as commonly applied in PR, might be optimal to improve muscle mass, strength and endurance in sarcopenic COPD patients. Theoretically, oxygen supplementation during exercise would enable a higher training intensity and thus would yield better improvements in muscle mass and strength. However, recent studies are heterogeneous in their results; some show improved exercise capacity and breathlessness but not muscle mass, whereas other studies show no difference in training results, irrespective of oxygen supplementation.128,129 Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is a passive form of exercise training where electrodes placed on the skin apply electrical stimulation of isolated muscles, evoking involuntary contractions. In a Cochrane review, Jones et al conclude that this passive form of muscle stimulation might be an effective treatment for muscle weakness in adults with advanced progressive disease.130 The fact that this is a portable, non-invasive and passive intervention, which does not evoke dyspnea, makes it suitable for even severely impaired and dyspneic COPD patients, whom might not tolerate active forms of exercise interventions.124 Several studies show that NMES improves exercise tolerance, walking distance, FFM and exercise induced dyspnea, but not peak power in (severely dyspneic) COPD patients. The extent of its efficacy in increasing muscle mass and strength and its possible role as adjuvant or addition to regular exercise warrants further investigation.124,130–132

Nutrition

Poor dietary intake resulting in low intake of essential nutrients is highly prevalent among the elderly population and contributes to weight loss, sarcopenia and frailty.133 Unintended weight loss is also common in COPD patients.54,134 In contrast to primary sarcopenia, malnutrition in COPD is associated with elevated energy- and probably also protein-requirements due to hypermetabolism135 and elevated whole body protein turnover.136 Emphysematous patients with severe airflow obstruction and hyperinflation and those suffering from chronic respiratory failure are at increased risk for weigh loss due to adverse effects on dietary intake. Furthermore during acute exacerbations appetite and dietary intake are often decreased.35,54 Adequate protein intake is of major importance when following an exercise program to enhance protein anabolism and facilitate muscle repair in health and disease. A reduced anabolic response to protein intake and a hypermetabolic state may further enhance protein requirements of sarcopenic elderly and in particular COPD patients.54,133 Furthermore, the Health ABC study demonstrated that high dietary protein intake in elderly was associated with less muscle mass loss over time, providing a strong rationale for adequate protein intake in sarcopenic elderly.56 Consensus on the optimal level of protein intake in sarcopenia management is yet to be determined; current recommendations vary substantially between 1.2 up to 2.0 g/kg.137 When supplementing protein, branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs), such as leucine and its metabolite beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate (HMB), seem to be of particular importance to increasing FFM, muscle mass and strength.138

Polyunsaturated fatty-acids (PUFA’s), more specifically omega-3 PUFA’s have been implicated to modulate (systemic) inflammatory processes, to boost muscle mitochondrial metabolism and to positively affect protein synthesis and exercise capacity.5,54,138–141 Positive effects of PUFA supplementation on exercise capacity in COPD has indeed been demonstrated,142 adding to the rationale for supplementation of PUFA’s next to sufficient protein intake to prevent or treat sarcopenia in COPD, but further evidence from clinical trials is needed.143

Vitamin D deficiency is common in COPD patients, especially in elderly patients.54,144 Vitamin D influences muscle metabolism and current literature does support the hypothesis that vitamin D supplementation might is beneficial in sarcopenia treatment. However, according to the recent review by Remelli et al, the exact role of vitamin D supplementation in the prevention of sarcopenia remains to be determined.145 Vitamin D supplementation was demonstrated to reduce the rate of COPD exacerbations, which indirectly might slow down the course of sarcopenia in these patients.146

Studies are diverse in their exact strategies, but a combination of exercise training with additional supplementation of different combinations of dietary protein (whey), PUFA’s and vitamin D are reported to maintain or improve FFM in both primary sarcopenia and sarcopenic COPD patients.56,141,147,148

Pharmacology

A combination of exercise therapy and nutritional interventions might not always be feasible in COPD patients with severe respiratory impairment or sarcopenia. Pharmacologic approaches could therefore be an important third party in a multimodal treatment plan for sarcopenia.

Anabolics

Both in young healthy adults, as in sarcopenic patients, testosterone or anabolic steroid treatment proved to increase muscle mass and reduce fat mass.124 Testosterone administration in COPD patients, alone or in conjunction with exercise, was associated with reduced hospitalization, increased FFM and muscle strength, but did not enhance exercise capacity,122,149,150 Similarly, intramuscular anabolic steroid injection in the form of nandrolone decanoate (ND) increased FFM without further improvement of exercise capacity compared to control when provided during PR, although exercise capacity was reported to increase by ND in the subgroup of patients on glucocorticoid medication.151 Although testosterone induced an increase in FFM, whether or not effects can be sustained after cessation of supplementation remains to be determined.152 Significant, usually dose dependent, side effects of testosterone administration (such as cardiovascular, gastro-intestinal and endocrine) have been well-documented and warrant caution when administering testosterone.149

Growth hormone (GH) promotes muscle growth through several pathways. Despite contradicting results, studies over the years have shown potential benefit of GH supplementation as it increased body weight, muscle mass and respiratory muscle strength in COPD patients.5,153 Importantly, as with testosterone, GH supplementation is associated with important, negative side effects (such as cardiovascular complications and insulin resistance) that raise serious concern for clinical practice.154

Ghrelin stimulates appetite and feeding. Preventing weight loss by stimulating appetite could be a desired effect in sarcopenia treatment and in those COPD patients with reduced appetite and insufficient calorie intake.154 In COPD patients, improvement of exercise capacity following ghrelin supplementation has been reported,124,155 although not all studies demonstrated an increase in muscle strength, or functionality.124

Myostatin Inhibition

As previously discussed, elevated levels of MSTN, a potent negative regulator of muscle mass, have been found in COPD. Inhibition of myostatin or antagonizing its receptor (activinIIR) consequently leads to muscle growth.124,154 Indeed Bimagrumab, an activinIIR antagonist proved to be of particular interest in sarcopenia treatment, as its administration to sarcopenic, community dwelling elderly improved muscle mass, strength and mobility.156 Strikingly, however, in COPD patients an increase in muscle mass, but no improvement in functional capacity after Bimagrumab treatment has been demonstrated.157 This suggests that improvement in muscle mass alone (through anabolic agents) may not be sufficient to improve physical performance, but also that COPD specific factors might be impacting the physical performance in parallel to affecting muscle mass.

Interventions Primarily Targeting the Respiratory System with Potential Benefits for Muscle in COPD

Smoking Cessation

Smoking cessation is the most effective intervention that can halt or slow down the progression of COPD.158,159 Besides its detrimental effects on lung tissue and function, evidence indicates cigarette smoke also impairs muscle mitochondrial function and muscle mass,160 implying that smoking cessation could have beneficial effects on muscle function. Indeed, recently a study in mice demonstrated that short-term smoking cessation reversed smoking-induced mitochondrial dysfunction, limb muscle mass loss and diaphragm muscle atrophy.161

Bronchodilators

Optimizing dyspnea treatment and reducing symptoms with bronchodilators can enhance exercise capacity.162,163 In addition, beta2-agonists, have been demonstrated to also exert anabolic effects on skeletal muscle.164,165 A recent study indicated increased skeletal muscle protein synthesis and breakdown after resistance exercise when administering oral salbutamol in young men, suggesting that these agents may contribute to muscle growth through direct anabolic actions and indirectly by facilitating increased muscle workload during PR by relieving dyspnea.166

Lung Volume Reduction Interventions

Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) and bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) through endobronchial valve (EBV) placement not only improve respiratory mechanics and efficiency, but also proved to enhance exercise capacity and body composition in terms of increased FFM.167,168 It is yet unclear if this effect reflects direct modulation of muscle, or whether this is secondary to a reduction in dyspnea symptoms, resulting in increased physical activity and subsequent preservation or recovery of muscle mass.

Conclusion and Perspective

The current literature clearly shows that both age-related and disease-specific determinants contribute to alterations in physiological processes involved in muscle maintenance leading to sarcopenia in COPD. Not only screening for sarcopenia itself, using validated tools, but also determining the presence of the above-mentioned triggers of sarcopenia is needed as an integral part of the diagnostic work-up of COPD patients at risk, to allow a timely and more personalized sarcopenia management approach. The choice of sarcopenia (severity) assessment methods may depend on available resources of the care setting (eg, general practice, hospital or rehabilitation centre). Furthermore, when determining physical performance for sarcopenia assessment, ventilatory impairment needs to be considered as confounding limiting factor to ensure one really measures the sarcopenia-related physical performance. In COPD, quadriceps strength has been strongly correlated to mortality and pulmonary function,5,169 but since the devices to reliably assess leg muscle strength are not portable, systematically assessing handgrip strength in all COPD patients, as proposed by Benz et al, can be a first step in screening for sarcopenia in COPD patients.4 The TUG test, providing information on both strength and functionality is easy to perform in all settings and proved not to be associated with airflow limitation.113 Next to available body composition assessment tools such as BIA, methods that may already be incorporated in standard care, such as chest CT-scans for pulmonary screening or a DEXA scan for osteoporosis screening can be optimized in a cost effective way for simultaneous determination of muscle mass.

Guided by objective assessment of physical performance, lung function and exercise induced symptoms, most prescribed exercise programs as part of PR are nowadays already personalized to the individual. More attention is however needed towards feasibility and efficacy of maintaining adequate exercise and physical activity interventions in daily life and to overcome challenges such as motivation, access to, and availability of those interventions.170 Current generic recommendations for adequate nutrition to combat sarcopenia are total daily energy intake of 25–30 kcal/kg body weight, protein intake 1.0–1.2 g/kg per day and vitamin D supplementation if lower than 30 ng/mL.170 Energy and protein requirements probably are even higher in hypermetabolic sarcopenic COPD patients prone to cachexia. Longitudinal assessment of body weight and muscle mass as an integrated part of the regular COPD care visits or telemonitoring allows timely incorporation of personalized dietary counseling and deployment of nutritional supplements. In the meantime ongoing research will reveal if additional pharmacological interventions or specific nutritional modulation may enhance feasibility, efficacy and sustainability of personalized sarcopenia management in a cost-effective manner. Combined, this is expected to provide personalized strategies for both prevention and treatment of sarcopenia for a large proportion of COPD patients.