BACKGROUND: Moving from sitting to standing is a common activity of daily living. The five-repetition sit-to-stand test (5STS) is a test of lower limb function that measures the fastest time taken to stand five times from a chair with arms folded. The 5STS has been validated in healthy community-dwelling adults, but data in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) populations are lacking. AIMS: To determine the reliability, validity and responsiveness of the 5STS in patients with COPD. METHODS: Test-retest and interobserver reliability of the 5STS was measured in 50 patients with COPD. To address construct validity we collected data on the 5STS, exercise capacity (incremental shuttle walk (ISW)), lower limb strength (quadriceps maximum voluntary contraction (QMVC)), health status (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)) and composite mortality indices (Age Dyspnoea Obstruction index (ADO), BODE index (iBODE)). Responsiveness was determined by measuring 5STS before and after outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in 239 patients. Minimum clinically important difference (MCID) was estimated using anchor-based methods. RESULTS: Test-retest and interobserver intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.97 and 0.99, respectively. 5STS time correlated significantly with ISW, QMVC, SGRQ, ADO and iBODE (r=-0.59, -0.38, 0.35, 0.42 and 0.46, respectively; all p<0.001). Median (25th, 75th centiles) 5STS time decreased with PR (Pre: 14.1 (11.5, 21.3) vs Post: 12.4 (10.2, 16.3) s; p<0.001). Using different anchors, a conservative estimate for the MCID was 1.7 s. CONCLUSIONS: The 5STS is reliable, valid and responsive in patients with COPD with an estimated MCID of 1.7 s. It is a practical functional outcome measure suitable for use in most healthcare settings.
BACKGROUND: Moving from sitting to standing is a common activity of daily living. The five-repetition sit-to-stand test (5STS) is a test of lower limb function that measures the fastest time taken to stand five times from a chair with arms folded. The 5STS has been validated in healthy community-dwelling adults, but data in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) populations are lacking. AIMS: To determine the reliability, validity and responsiveness of the 5STS in patients with COPD. METHODS: Test-retest and interobserver reliability of the 5STS was measured in 50 patients with COPD. To address construct validity we collected data on the 5STS, exercise capacity (incremental shuttle walk (ISW)), lower limb strength (quadriceps maximum voluntary contraction (QMVC)), health status (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)) and composite mortality indices (Age Dyspnoea Obstruction index (ADO), BODE index (iBODE)). Responsiveness was determined by measuring 5STS before and after outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in 239 patients. Minimum clinically important difference (MCID) was estimated using anchor-based methods. RESULTS: Test-retest and interobserver intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.97 and 0.99, respectively. 5STS time correlated significantly with ISW, QMVC, SGRQ, ADO and iBODE (r=-0.59, -0.38, 0.35, 0.42 and 0.46, respectively; all p<0.001). Median (25th, 75th centiles) 5STS time decreased with PR (Pre: 14.1 (11.5, 21.3) vs Post: 12.4 (10.2, 16.3) s; p<0.001). Using different anchors, a conservative estimate for the MCID was 1.7 s. CONCLUSIONS: The 5STS is reliable, valid and responsive in patients with COPD with an estimated MCID of 1.7 s. It is a practical functional outcome measure suitable for use in most healthcare settings.
Authors: Rafael Mesquita; Sarah Wilke; Dionne E Smid; Daisy Ja Janssen; Frits Me Franssen; Vanessa S Probst; Emiel Fm Wouters; Jean Wm Muris; Fabio Pitta; Martijn A Spruit Journal: Chron Respir Dis Date: 2016-07-08 Impact factor: 2.444
Authors: Sara C Buttery; Divya Mohan; Marie Fisk; Nicholas S Hopkinson; Ruth Tal-Singer; Ian B Wilkinson; Michael I Polkey Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2017-08-10 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Samantha S C Kon; Jane L Canavan; Claire M Nolan; Sarah E Jones; Amy L Clark; Michael I Polkey; William D-C Man Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2014-01-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Raolat M Abdulai; Tina Jellesmark Jensen; Naimish R Patel; Michael I Polkey; Paul Jansson; Bartolomé R Celli; Stephen I Rennard Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2018-02-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Emma Haldane Beisheim; John Robert Horne; Ryan Todd Pohlig; Jaclyn Megan Sions Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 2.159
Authors: Divya Mohan; Victoria S Benson; Matthew Allinder; Nicholas Galwey; Charlotte E Bolton; John R Cockcroft; William MacNee; Ian B Wilkinson; Ruth Tal-Singer; Michael I Polkey Journal: Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis Date: 2020-01