| Literature DB >> 33442189 |
Suhaimi Hussain1, Maged Elnajeh1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We aim to study the prevalence and risk factors of hypovitaminosis D among healthy adolescents in Kota Bharu, Kelantan based on the most recent Paediatric Consensus guideline.Entities:
Keywords: adolescents; hypovitaminosis D; nutritional rickets
Year: 2020 PMID: 33442189 PMCID: PMC7784196 DOI: 10.15605/jafes.035.02.05
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J ASEAN Fed Endocr Soc ISSN: 0857-1074
Demographics of participants
| Variable | Results |
|---|---|
| Age (years)[ | 15.9±1.39 |
| Gender | |
| Male | 134 (37.1) |
| Female | 227 (62.9) |
| Weight (kg)[ | 53.0±16.8 |
| Height (cm)[ | 156.2±19.2 |
| Vitamin D (ng/mL)[ | 19.6±8.2 |
| i-PTH (pmol/L)[ | 33.4±18.0 |
| Race | |
| Malay | 307 (85) |
| Chinese | 54 (15) |
| BMI | |
| Obese | 27 (7.5) |
| Normal | 292 (80.9) |
| Underweight | 40 (11.1) |
n (%)
mean±SD
Univariate analysis for factors affecting vitamin D level
| Variable | Crude OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.87 (0.72, 1.06) | 0.191 |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 1.00 | 0.0001 |
| Female | 22.1 (5.30, 92.3) | |
| Race | ||
| Chinese | 1.00 | 0.029 |
| Malay | 3.79 (1.14, 12.59) | |
| Socio-economy | ||
| <RM 2000 | 1.00 | 0.033 |
| >RM 2000 | 4.32 (1.12, 16.59) | |
| BMI | ||
| Normal | 1.00 | |
| Obesity | 2.74 (1.16,6.49) | 0.022 |
| Underweight | 0.61 (020, 1.79) | 0.37 |
| i-PTH | 1.00 (0.99, 1.02) | 0.249 |
Simple logistic regression
Multivariate analysis for factors associated with vitamin D deficiency
| Variable | Crude OR[ | Adjusted OR[ | Wald statistic (df) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race | ||||
| Malay | 1.00 | |||
| Chinese | 0.26 (0.07, 0.87) | 0.24 (0.07, 0.84) | 4.99 (1) | 0.025 |
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 1.00 | |||
| Female | 22.1 (5.30, 92.3) | 23.7 (5.64, 100.3) | 18.6 (1) | 0.0001 |
Simple logistic regression
Multiple logistic regression, the model reasonably fits well. Model assumptions are met. There are no interaction & multicollinearity problems.
Variance Inflation Factor <10
Correlation is weak that indicates no multicollinearity
Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit p-value=0.966, not significant and therefore the model fits
Overall correct classification=83.8%
Area under the curve=0.762 (95% CI=0.706, 0.818)