Literature DB >> 33441727

Radiation-induced cell cycle perturbations: a computational tool validated with flow-cytometry data.

Leonardo Lonati1, Sofia Barbieri2,3, Isabella Guardamagna2, Andrea Ottolenghi2, Giorgio Baiocco2.   

Abstract

Cell cycle progression can be studied with computational models that allow to describe and predict its perturbation by agents as ionizing radiation or drugs. Such models can then be integrated in tools for pre-clinical/clinical use, e.g. to optimize kinetically-based administration protocols of radiation therapy and chemotherapy. We present a deterministic compartmental model, specifically reproducing how cells that survive radiation exposure are distributed in the cell cycle as a function of dose and time after exposure. Model compartments represent the four cell-cycle phases, as a function of DNA content and time. A system of differential equations, whose parameters represent transition rates, division rate and DNA synthesis rate, describes the temporal evolution. Initial model inputs are data from unexposed cells in exponential growth. Perturbation is implemented as an alteration of model parameters that allows to best reproduce cell-cycle profiles post-irradiation. The model is validated with dedicated in vitro measurements on human lung fibroblasts (IMR90). Cells were irradiated with 2 and 5 Gy with a Varian 6 MV Clinac at IRCCS Maugeri. Flow cytometry analysis was performed at the RadBioPhys Laboratory (University of Pavia), obtaining cell percentages in each of the four phases in all studied conditions up to 72 h post-irradiation. Cells show early [Formula: see text]-phase block (increasing in duration as dose increases) and later [Formula: see text]-phase accumulation. For each condition, we identified the best sets of model parameters that lead to a good agreement between model and experimental data, varying transition rates from [Formula: see text]- to S- and from [Formula: see text]- to M-phase. This work offers a proof-of-concept validation of the new computational tool, opening to its future development and, in perspective, to its integration in a wider framework for clinical use.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33441727      PMCID: PMC7806866          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-79934-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  20 in total

1.  Theoretical basis for cell cycle analysis: II. Further studies on labelled mitosis wave method.

Authors:  M Takahashi
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1968-02       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  Stability of the steady-state size distribution in a model of cell growth and division.

Authors:  K B Hannsgen; J J Tyson
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  p53-mediated accumulation of hypophosphorylated pRb after the G1 restriction point fails to halt cell cycle progression.

Authors:  S P Linke; M P Harris; S E Neugebauer; K C Clarkin; H M Shepard; D C Maneval; G M Wahl
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1997-07-17       Impact factor: 9.867

4.  The limitations of the G1-S checkpoint.

Authors:  Dorothee Deckbar; Thomas Stiff; Barbara Koch; Caroline Reis; Markus Löbrich; Penny A Jeggo
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Irreversible APC(Cdh1) Inactivation Underlies the Point of No Return for Cell-Cycle Entry.

Authors:  Steven D Cappell; Mingyu Chung; Ariel Jaimovich; Sabrina L Spencer; Tobias Meyer
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  An age-and-cyclin-structured cell population model for healthy and tumoral tissues.

Authors:  Fadia Bekkal Brikci; Jean Clairambault; Benjamin Ribba; Benoît Perthame
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 2.259

7.  A mathematical model for analysis of the cell cycle in cell lines derived from human tumors.

Authors:  Britta Basse; Bruce C Baguley; Elaine S Marshall; Wayne R Joseph; Bruce van Brunt; Graeme Wake; David J N Wall
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 2.259

8.  The effect of the G1-S transition checkpoint on an age structured cell cycle model.

Authors:  Gary S Chaffey; David J B Lloyd; Anne C Skeldon; Norman F Kirkby
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A Co-culture Method to Investigate the Crosstalk Between X-ray Irradiated Caco-2 Cells and PBMC.

Authors:  Gabriele Babini; Jacopo Morini; Sofia Barbieri; Giorgio Baiocco; Giovanni Battista Ivaldi; Marco Liotta; Paola Tabarelli de Fatis; Andrea Ottolenghi
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 1.355

10.  Towards predicting the response of a solid tumour to chemotherapy and radiotherapy treatments: clinical insights from a computational model.

Authors:  Gibin G Powathil; Douglas J A Adamson; Mark A J Chaplain
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Advances in the Current Understanding of How Low-Dose Radiation Affects the Cell Cycle.

Authors:  Md Gulam Musawwir Khan; Yi Wang
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 6.600

2.  The Influence of Different γ-Irradiation Patterns on Factors that May Affect Cell Cycle Progression in Male Rats.

Authors:  Manal R Mohammed; Azza M El-Bahkery; Shereen M Shedid
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 2.623

3.  Proteomic Analysis of the Inflorescence Stem Mechanical Strength Difference in Herbaceous Peonies (Paeonia lactiflora Pall.).

Authors:  Yan Sun; Ruomin Li; Huanxin Zhang; Jingjing Ye; Chengzhong Li
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-09-26

4.  An Integrated Analysis of the Response of Colorectal Adenocarcinoma Caco-2 Cells to X-Ray Exposure.

Authors:  Isabella Guardamagna; Leonardo Lonati; Monica Savio; Lucia A Stivala; Andrea Ottolenghi; Giorgio Baiocco
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 6.244

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.