Literature DB >> 20460507

The limitations of the G1-S checkpoint.

Dorothee Deckbar1, Thomas Stiff, Barbara Koch, Caroline Reis, Markus Löbrich, Penny A Jeggo.   

Abstract

It has been proposed that the G(1)-S checkpoint is the critical regulator of genomic stability, preventing the cell cycle progression of cells with a single DNA double-strand break. Using fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis of asynchronous cells and microscopic analysis of asynchronous and synchronized cells, we show that full blockage of S-phase entry is only observed >4 hours after irradiation. The process is ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) dependent and Chk1/2 independent and can be activated throughout G(1) phase. By monitoring S-phase entry of irradiated synchronized cells, we show that the duration of arrest is dose dependent, with S-phase entry recommencing after arrest with kinetics similar to that observed in unirradiated cells. Thus, G(1)-S checkpoint arrest is not always permanent. Following exposure to higher doses (> or =2 Gy), G(1)-S arrest is inefficiently maintained, allowing progression of G(1)-phase cells into G(2) with elevated gammaH2AX foci and chromosome breaks. At early times after irradiation (< or =4 h), G(1)-S checkpoint arrest is not established but cells enter S phase at a reduced rate. This early slowing in S-phase entry is ATM and Chk2 dependent and detectable after 100 mGy, showing a novel and sensitive damage response. However, the time needed to establish G(1)-S checkpoint arrest provides a window when cells can progress to G(2) and form chromosome breaks. Our findings detail the efficacy of the G(1)-S checkpoint and define two significant limitations: At early times after IR, the activated checkpoint fails to efficiently prevent S-phase entry, and at later times, the checkpoint is inefficiently maintained. Copyright 2010 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20460507     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  22 in total

1.  DNA double-strand breaks as potential indicators for the biological effects of ionising radiation exposure from cardiac CT and conventional coronary angiography: a randomised, controlled study.

Authors:  Dominik Geisel; Elke Zimmermann; Matthias Rief; Johannes Greupner; Michael Laule; Fabian Knebel; Bernd Hamm; Marc Dewey
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Comprehensive profiling of radiosensitive human cell lines with DNA damage response assays identifies the neutral comet assay as a potential surrogate for clonogenic survival.

Authors:  Shareef A Nahas; Robert Davies; Francesca Fike; Kotoka Nakamura; Liutao Du; Refik Kayali; Nathan T Martin; Patrick Concannon; Richard A Gatti
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 3.  Maintenance of genomic integrity after DNA double strand breaks in the human prostate and seminal vesicle epithelium: the best and the worst.

Authors:  Sari Jäämaa; Marikki Laiho
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 6.603

4.  Cre recombinase induces DNA damage and tetraploidy in the absence of loxP sites.

Authors:  Vaibhao C Janbandhu; Daniel Moik; Reinhard Fässler
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 4.534

5.  Quantitative live cell imaging reveals a gradual shift between DNA repair mechanisms and a maximal use of HR in mid S phase.

Authors:  Ketki Karanam; Ran Kafri; Alexander Loewer; Galit Lahav
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  Orchestration of DNA Damage Checkpoint Dynamics across the Human Cell Cycle.

Authors:  Hui Xiao Chao; Cere E Poovey; Ashley A Privette; Gavin D Grant; Hui Yan Chao; Jeanette G Cook; Jeremy E Purvis
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 10.304

7.  Assessing cell cycle progression of neural stem and progenitor cells in the mouse developing brain after genotoxic stress.

Authors:  Olivier Etienne; Amandine Bery; Telma Roque; Chantal Desmaze; François D Boussin
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 1.355

8.  Lack of a p21waf1/cip -dependent G1/S checkpoint in neural stem and progenitor cells after DNA damage in vivo.

Authors:  Telma Roque; Céline Haton; Olivier Etienne; Alexandra Chicheportiche; Laure Rousseau; Ludovic Martin; Marc-André Mouthon; François D Boussin
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 6.277

9.  CtIP and MRN promote non-homologous end-joining of etoposide-induced DNA double-strand breaks in G1.

Authors:  Verena Quennet; Andrea Beucher; Olivia Barton; Shunichi Takeda; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Visualisation of γH2AX foci caused by heavy ion particle traversal; distinction between core track versus non-track damage.

Authors:  Nakako Izumi Nakajima; Holly Brunton; Ritsuko Watanabe; Amruta Shrikhande; Ryoichi Hirayama; Naruhiro Matsufuji; Akira Fujimori; Takeshi Murakami; Ryuichi Okayasu; Penny Jeggo; Atsushi Shibata
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.