Literature DB >> 33441722

Resolution of the paradox of the diamagnetic effect on the Kibble coil.

Shisong Li1, Stephan Schlamminger2, Rafael Marangoni3, Qing Wang4, Darine Haddad3, Frank Seifert3, Leon Chao3, David Newell3, Wei Zhao5.   

Abstract

Employing very simple electro-mechanical principles known from classical physics, the Kibble balance establishes a very precise and absolute link between quantum electrical standards and macroscopic mass or force measurements. The success of the Kibble balance, in both determining fundamental constants (h, [Formula: see text], e) and realizing a quasi-quantum mass in the 2019 newly revised International System of Units, relies on the perfection of Maxwell's equations and the symmetry they describe between Lorentz's force and Faraday's induction, a principle and a symmetry stunningly demonstrated in the weighing and velocity modes of Kibble balances to within [Formula: see text], with nothing but imperfect wires and magnets. However, recent advances in the understanding of the current effect in Kibble balances reveal a troubling paradox. A diamagnetic effect, a force that does not cancel between mass-on and mass-off measurement, is challenging balance maker's assumptions of symmetry at levels that are almost two orders of magnitude larger than the reported uncertainties. The diamagnetic effect, if it exists, shows up in weighing mode without a readily apparent reciprocal effect in the velocity mode, begging questions about systematic errors at the very foundation of the new measurement system. The hypothetical force is caused by the coil current changing the magnetic field, producing an unaccounted force that is systematically modulated with the weighing current. Here we show that this diamagnetic force exists, but the additional force does not change the equivalence between weighing and velocity measurements. We reveal the unexpected way that symmetry is preserved and show that for typical materials and geometries the total relative effect on the measurement is [Formula: see text].

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33441722      PMCID: PMC7806723          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-80173-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.996


  6 in total

1.  The route to atomic and quantum standards.

Authors:  Jeff Flowers
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-11-19       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Atomic clock performance enabling geodesy below the centimetre level.

Authors:  W F McGrew; X Zhang; R J Fasano; S A Schäffer; K Beloy; D Nicolodi; R C Brown; N Hinkley; G Milani; M Schioppo; T H Yoon; A D Ludlow
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  History and progress on accurate measurements of the Planck constant.

Authors:  Richard Steiner
Journal:  Rep Prog Phys       Date:  2012-12-18

4.  Atomic clocks for geodesy.

Authors:  Tanja E Mehlstäubler; Gesine Grosche; Christian Lisdat; Piet O Schmidt; Heiner Denker
Journal:  Rep Prog Phys       Date:  2018-04-18

5.  Coherent optical clock down-conversion for microwave frequencies with 10-18 instability.

Authors:  Takuma Nakamura; Josue Davila-Rodriguez; Holly Leopardi; Jeff A Sherman; Tara M Fortier; Xiaojun Xie; Joe C Campbell; William F McGrew; Xiaogang Zhang; Youssef S Hassan; Daniele Nicolodi; Kyle Beloy; Andrew D Ludlow; Scott A Diddams; Franklyn Quinlan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Quantifying the quantum.

Authors:  Stephan Schlamminger
Journal:  Nat Phys       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 20.034

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.