Literature DB >> 23249618

History and progress on accurate measurements of the Planck constant.

Richard Steiner1.   

Abstract

The measurement of the Planck constant, h, is entering a new phase. The CODATA 2010 recommended value is 6.626 069 57 × 10(-34) J s, but it has been a long road, and the trip is not over yet. Since its discovery as a fundamental physical constant to explain various effects in quantum theory, h has become especially important in defining standards for electrical measurements and soon, for mass determination. Measuring h in the International System of Units (SI) started as experimental attempts merely to prove its existence. Many decades passed while newer experiments measured physical effects that were the influence of h combined with other physical constants: elementary charge, e, and the Avogadro constant, N(A). As experimental techniques improved, the precision of the value of h expanded. When the Josephson and quantum Hall theories led to new electronic devices, and a hundred year old experiment, the absolute ampere, was altered into a watt balance, h not only became vital in definitions for the volt and ohm units, but suddenly it could be measured directly and even more accurately. Finally, as measurement uncertainties now approach a few parts in 10(8) from the watt balance experiments and Avogadro determinations, its importance has been linked to a proposed redefinition of a kilogram unit of mass. The path to higher accuracy in measuring the value of h was not always an example of continuous progress. Since new measurements periodically led to changes in its accepted value and the corresponding SI units, it is helpful to see why there were bumps in the road and where the different branch lines of research joined in the effort. Recalling the bumps along this road will hopefully avoid their repetition in the upcoming SI redefinition debates. This paper begins with a brief history of the methods to measure a combination of fundamental constants, thus indirectly obtaining the Planck constant. The historical path is followed in the section describing how the improved techniques and discoveries in quantum mechanics steadily reduced the uncertainty of h. The central part of this review describes the technical details of the watt balance technique, which is a combination of the mechanical and electronic measurements that now determine h as a direct result, i.e. not requiring measured values of additional fundamental constants. The first technical section describes the basics and some of the common details of many watt balance designs. Next is a review of the ongoing advances at the (currently) seven national metrology institutions where these experiments are pursued. A final summary of the recent h determinations of the last two decades shows how history keeps repeating itself; there is again a question of whether there is a shift in the newest results, albeit at uncertainties that are many orders of magnitude less than the original experiments. The conclusion is that there is room for further development to resolve these differences and find new ideas for a watt balance system with a more universal application. Since the next generation of watt balance experiments are expected to become kilogram realization standards, the historical record suggests that there is yet a need for proof that Planck constant results are finally reproducible at an acceptable uncertainty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23249618     DOI: 10.1088/0034-4885/76/1/016101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rep Prog Phys        ISSN: 0034-4885


  7 in total

1.  An ode to the atomic weights.

Authors:  Juris Meija
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 24.427

2.  Two simple modifications to improve the magnetic field profile in radial magnetic systems.

Authors:  Shisong Li; Stephan Schlamminger
Journal:  Meas Sci Technol       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 2.046

3.  The watt or Kibble balance: a technique for implementing the new SI definition of the unit of mass.

Authors:  Ian A Robinson; Stephan Schlamminger
Journal:  Metrologia       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 3.157

4.  Contributions of precision engineering to the revision of the SI.

Authors:  Harald Bosse; Horst Kunzmann; Jon R Pratt; Stephan Schlamminger; Ian Robinson; Michael de Podesta; Paul Shore; Alessandro Balsamo; Paul Morantz
Journal:  CIRP Ann Manuf Technol       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 3.916

5.  Resolution of the paradox of the diamagnetic effect on the Kibble coil.

Authors:  Shisong Li; Stephan Schlamminger; Rafael Marangoni; Qing Wang; Darine Haddad; Frank Seifert; Leon Chao; David Newell; Wei Zhao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Characterising Exciton Generation in Bulk-Heterojunction Organic Solar Cells.

Authors:  Kiran Sreedhar Ram; Hooman Mehdizadeh-Rad; David Ompong; Daniel Dodzi Yao Setsoafia; Jai Singh
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 5.076

7.  Invited Article: A precise instrument to determine the Planck constant, and the future kilogram.

Authors:  D Haddad; F Seifert; L S Chao; S Li; D B Newell; J R Pratt; C Williams; S Schlamminger
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.523

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.