Literature DB >> 33441684

Simultaneous lesion and brain segmentation in multiple sclerosis using deep neural networks.

Richard McKinley1, Rik Wepfer2, Fabian Aschwanden2, Lorenz Grunder2, Raphaela Muri2, Christian Rummel2, Rajeev Verma3, Christian Weisstanner4, Mauricio Reyes5, Anke Salmen6, Andrew Chan6, Franca Wagner2, Roland Wiest2.   

Abstract

Segmentation of white matter lesions and deep grey matter structures is an important task in the quantification of magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis. In this paper we explore segmentation solutions based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for providing fast, reliable segmentations of lesions and grey-matter structures in multi-modal MR imaging, and the performance of these methods when applied to out-of-centre data. We trained two state-of-the-art fully convolutional CNN architectures on the 2016 MSSEG training dataset, which was annotated by seven independent human raters: a reference implementation of a 3D Unet, and a more recently proposed 3D-to-2D architecture (DeepSCAN). We then retrained those methods on a larger dataset from a single centre, with and without labels for other brain structures. We quantified changes in performance owing to dataset shift, and changes in performance by adding the additional brain-structure labels. We also compared performance with freely available reference methods. Both fully-convolutional CNN methods substantially outperform other approaches in the literature when trained and evaluated in cross-validation on the MSSEG dataset, showing agreement with human raters in the range of human inter-rater variability. Both architectures showed drops in performance when trained on single-centre data and tested on the MSSEG dataset. When trained with the addition of weak anatomical labels derived from Freesurfer, the performance of the 3D Unet degraded, while the performance of the DeepSCAN net improved. Overall, the DeepSCAN network predicting both lesion and anatomical labels was the best-performing network examined.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33441684      PMCID: PMC7806997          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-79925-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  26 in total

1.  3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network.

Authors:  Andriy Fedorov; Reinhard Beichel; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Julien Finet; Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin; Sonia Pujol; Christian Bauer; Dominique Jennings; Fiona Fennessy; Milan Sonka; John Buatti; Stephen Aylward; James V Miller; Steve Pieper; Ron Kikinis
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 2.  Evidence-based guidelines: MAGNIMS consensus guidelines on the use of MRI in multiple sclerosis--establishing disease prognosis and monitoring patients.

Authors:  Mike P Wattjes; Àlex Rovira; David Miller; Tarek A Yousry; Maria P Sormani; Maria P de Stefano; Mar Tintoré; Cristina Auger; Carmen Tur; Massimo Filippi; Maria A Rocca; Franz Fazekas; Ludwig Kappos; Chris Polman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 3.  Biomarkers of disease activity in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Jerome J Graber; Suhayl Dhib-Jalbut
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2011-04-03       Impact factor: 3.181

4.  An automated tool for detection of FLAIR-hyperintense white-matter lesions in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Paul Schmidt; Christian Gaser; Milan Arsic; Dorothea Buck; Annette Förschler; Achim Berthele; Muna Hoshi; Rüdiger Ilg; Volker J Schmid; Claus Zimmer; Bernhard Hemmer; Mark Mühlau
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  DeepNAT: Deep convolutional neural network for segmenting neuroanatomy.

Authors:  Christian Wachinger; Martin Reuter; Tassilo Klein
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  T1 Recovery Is Predominantly Found in Black Holes and Is Associated with Clinical Improvement in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  C Thaler; T D Faizy; J Sedlacik; B Holst; K Stürner; C Heesen; J-P Stellmann; J Fiehler; S Siemonsen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Using gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging lesions to monitor disease activity in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  H F McFarland; J A Frank; P S Albert; M E Smith; R Martin; J O Harris; N Patronas; H Maloni; D E McFarlin
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 8.  Review of automatic segmentation methods of multiple sclerosis white matter lesions on conventional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Daniel García-Lorenzo; Simon Francis; Sridar Narayanan; Douglas L Arnold; D Louis Collins
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 8.545

9.  Automatic detection of lesion load change in Multiple Sclerosis using convolutional neural networks with segmentation confidence.

Authors:  Richard McKinley; Rik Wepfer; Lorenz Grunder; Fabian Aschwanden; Tim Fischer; Christoph Friedli; Raphaela Muri; Christian Rummel; Rajeev Verma; Christian Weisstanner; Benedikt Wiestler; Christoph Berger; Paul Eichinger; Mark Muhlau; Mauricio Reyes; Anke Salmen; Andrew Chan; Roland Wiest; Franca Wagner
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 4.881

10.  A contrast-adaptive method for simultaneous whole-brain and lesion segmentation in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Stefano Cerri; Oula Puonti; Dominik S Meier; Jens Wuerfel; Mark Mühlau; Hartwig R Siebner; Koen Van Leemput
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  7 in total

1.  Medical-Blocks-A Platform for Exploration, Management, Analysis, and Sharing of Data in Biomedical Research: System Development and Integration Results.

Authors:  Waldo Valenzuela; Fabian Balsiger; Roland Wiest; Olivier Scheidegger
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-04-11

2.  A joint ventricle and WMH segmentation from MRI for evaluation of healthy and pathological changes in the aging brain.

Authors:  Hans E Atlason; Askell Love; Vidar Robertsson; Ari M Blitz; Sigurdur Sigurdsson; Vilmundur Gudnason; Lotta M Ellingsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Automatic Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Delineation Tool for Clinical Use.

Authors:  Amalie Monberg Hindsholm; Stig Præstekjær Cramer; Helle Juhl Simonsen; Jette Lautrup Frederiksen; Flemming Andersen; Liselotte Højgaard; Claes Nøhr Ladefoged; Ulrich Lindberg
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 3.156

4.  Multiple sclerosis cortical lesion detection with deep learning at ultra-high-field MRI.

Authors:  Francesco La Rosa; Erin S Beck; Josefina Maranzano; Ramona-Alexandra Todea; Peter van Gelderen; Jacco A de Zwart; Nicholas J Luciano; Jeff H Duyn; Jean-Philippe Thiran; Cristina Granziera; Daniel S Reich; Pascal Sati; Meritxell Bach Cuadra
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 4.478

5.  Investigating efficient CNN architecture for multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation.

Authors:  Alexandre Fenneteau; Pascal Bourdon; David Helbert; Christine Fernandez-Maloigne; Christophe Habas; Rémy Guillevin
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-02-06

6.  Radius-optimized efficient template matching for lesion detection from brain images.

Authors:  Subhranil Koley; Pranab K Dutta; Iman Aganj
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  A contrast-adaptive method for simultaneous whole-brain and lesion segmentation in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Stefano Cerri; Oula Puonti; Dominik S Meier; Jens Wuerfel; Mark Mühlau; Hartwig R Siebner; Koen Van Leemput
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 6.556

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.