Literature DB >> 23084503

Review of automatic segmentation methods of multiple sclerosis white matter lesions on conventional magnetic resonance imaging.

Daniel García-Lorenzo1, Simon Francis, Sridar Narayanan, Douglas L Arnold, D Louis Collins.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is often used to characterize and quantify multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions in the brain and spinal cord. The number and volume of lesions have been used to evaluate MS disease burden, to track the progression of the disease and to evaluate the effect of new pharmaceuticals in clinical trials. Accurate identification of MS lesions in MR images is extremely difficult due to variability in lesion location, size and shape in addition to anatomical variability between subjects. Since manual segmentation requires expert knowledge, is time consuming and is subject to intra- and inter-expert variability, many methods have been proposed to automatically segment lesions. The objective of this study was to carry out a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the state of the art in automated multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation. From 1240 hits found initially with PubMed and Google scholar, our selection criteria identified 80 papers that described an automatic lesion segmentation procedure applied to MS. Only 47 of these included quantitative validation with at least one realistic image. In this paper, we describe the complexity of lesion segmentation, classify the automatic MS lesion segmentation methods found, and review the validation methods applied in each of the papers reviewed. Although many segmentation solutions have been proposed, including some with promising results using MRI data obtained on small groups of patients, no single method is widely employed due to performance issues related to the high variability of MS lesion appearance and differences in image acquisition. The challenge remains to provide segmentation techniques that work in all cases regardless of the type of MS, duration of the disease, or MRI protocol, and this within a comprehensive, standardized validation framework. MS lesion segmentation remains an open problem.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23084503     DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2012.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   8.545


  82 in total

1.  A toolbox for multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation.

Authors:  Eloy Roura; Arnau Oliver; Mariano Cabezas; Sergi Valverde; Deborah Pareto; Joan C Vilanova; Lluís Ramió-Torrentà; Àlex Rovira; Xavier Lladó
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 2.  Segmentation of human brain using structural MRI.

Authors:  Gunther Helms
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Longitudinal multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation: Resource and challenge.

Authors:  Aaron Carass; Snehashis Roy; Amod Jog; Jennifer L Cuzzocreo; Elizabeth Magrath; Adrian Gherman; Julia Button; James Nguyen; Ferran Prados; Carole H Sudre; Manuel Jorge Cardoso; Niamh Cawley; Olga Ciccarelli; Claudia A M Wheeler-Kingshott; Sébastien Ourselin; Laurence Catanese; Hrishikesh Deshpande; Pierre Maurel; Olivier Commowick; Christian Barillot; Xavier Tomas-Fernandez; Simon K Warfield; Suthirth Vaidya; Abhijith Chunduru; Ramanathan Muthuganapathy; Ganapathy Krishnamurthi; Andrew Jesson; Tal Arbel; Oskar Maier; Heinz Handels; Leonardo O Iheme; Devrim Unay; Saurabh Jain; Diana M Sima; Dirk Smeets; Mohsen Ghafoorian; Bram Platel; Ariel Birenbaum; Hayit Greenspan; Pierre-Louis Bazin; Peter A Calabresi; Ciprian M Crainiceanu; Lotta M Ellingsen; Daniel S Reich; Jerry L Prince; Dzung L Pham
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Intensity based methods for brain MRI longitudinal registration. A study on multiple sclerosis patients.

Authors:  Yago Diez; Arnau Oliver; Mariano Cabezas; Sergi Valverde; Robert Martí; Joan Carles Vilanova; Lluís Ramió-Torrentà; Alex Rovira; Xavier Lladó
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2014-07

5.  Automatic segmentation and volumetric quantification of white matter hyperintensities on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images using the extreme value distribution.

Authors:  Rui Wang; Chao Li; Jie Wang; Xiaoer Wei; Yuehua Li; Yuemin Zhu; Su Zhang
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Automated Segmentation of Tissues Using CT and MRI: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Leon Lenchik; Laura Heacock; Ashley A Weaver; Robert D Boutin; Tessa S Cook; Jason Itri; Christopher G Filippi; Rao P Gullapalli; James Lee; Marianna Zagurovskaya; Tara Retson; Kendra Godwin; Joey Nicholson; Ponnada A Narayana
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Automatic Quantification of Computed Tomography Features in Acute Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Saurabh Jain; Thijs Vande Vyvere; Vasilis Terzopoulos; Diana Maria Sima; Eloy Roura; Andrew Maas; Guido Wilms; Jan Verheyden
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 5.269

8.  Longitudinal Patch-Based Segmentation of Multiple Sclerosis White Matter Lesions.

Authors:  Snehashis Roy; Aaron Carass; Jerry L Prince; Dzung L Pham
Journal:  Mach Learn Med Imaging       Date:  2015-10-02

Review 9.  Radiological images and machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects.

Authors:  Zhenwei Zhang; Ervin Sejdić
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 4.589

Review 10.  Methods and challenges in quantitative imaging biomarker development.

Authors:  Richard G Abramson; Kirsteen R Burton; John-Paul J Yu; Ernest M Scalzetti; Thomas E Yankeelov; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Mishal Mendiratta-Lala; Brian J Bartholmai; Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan; Leon Lenchik; Rathan M Subramaniam
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.