Literature DB >> 33441653

Quantitative STAU2 measurement in lymphocytes for breast cancer risk assessment.

Charoenchai Puttipanyalears1, Sikrit Denariyakoon2, Phonthep Angsuwatcharakon1, Vitavat Aksornkitti1, Mawin Vongsaisuwan3, Sutasinee Asayut4, Somchai Thanasitthichai4, Narisorn Kongruttanachok5, Chatchawit Aporntewan1,6, Apiwat Mutirangura7.   

Abstract

Although mammograms play a key role in early breast cancer detection, the test is not applicable to all women, for example, women under the age of 40. The development of a noninvasive blood test with high sensitivity and accessibility will improve the effectiveness of breast cancer screening programmes. Secretory factors released from cancer cells can induce the expression of certain genes in a large number of white blood cells (WBCs). Therefore, cancer-dependent proteins in WBCs can be used as tumour markers with high sensitivity. Five proteins (LMAN1, AZI2, STAU2, MMP9 and PLOD1) from a systemic analysis of a variety of array data of breast cancer patients were subjected to immunofluorescence staining to evaluate the presence of fixed WBCs on 96-well plates from 363 healthy females and 358 female breast cancer patients. The results revealed that the average fluorescence intensity of anti-STAU2 and the percentage of STAU2-positive T and B lymphocytes in breast cancer patients (110.50 ± 23.38 and 61.87 ± 12.44, respectively) were significantly increased compared with those in healthy females (56.47 ± 32.03 and 33.02 ± 18.10, respectively) (p = 3.56 × 10-71, odds ratio = 24.59, 95% CI = 16.64-36.34). The effect of secreted molecules from breast cancer cells was proven by the increase in STAU2 intensity in PBMCs cocultured with MCF-7 and T47D cells at 48 h (p = 0.0289). The test demonstrated 98.32%, 82.96%, and 48.32% sensitivity and 56.47%, 83.47%, and 98.62% specificity in correlation with the percentage of STAU2-positive cells at 40, 53.34 and 63.38, respectively. We also demonstrated how to use the STAU2 test for the assessment of risk in women under the age of 40. STAU2 is a novel breast cancer marker that can be assessed by quantitative immunofluorescence staining of fixed WBCs that are transportable at room temperature via mail, representing a useful risk assessment tool for women without access to mammograms.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33441653      PMCID: PMC7806934          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-79622-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  42 in total

Review 1.  Newborn Screening: History, Current Status, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Ayman W El-Hattab; Mohammed Almannai; V Reid Sutton
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.278

2.  Epstein-Barr viral DNA in serum of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  A Mutirangura; W Pornthanakasem; A Theamboonlers; V Sriuranpong; P Lertsanguansinchi; S Yenrudi; N Voravud; P Supiyaphun; Y Poovorawan
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 3.  Circulating tumor markers in breast cancer: accepted utilities and novel prospects.

Authors:  V Stearns; H Yamauchi; D F Hayes
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Motivators and barriers to mammography screening uptake by female health-care workers in primary health-care centres: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Zaher Nazzal; Hisham Sholi; Suha B Sholi; Mohammad B Sholi; Rawya Lahaseh
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Breast cancer upregulating genes in stromal cells by LINE-1 hypermethylation and micrometastatic detection.

Authors:  Charoenchai Puttipanyalears; Nakarin Kitkumthorn; Supranee Buranapraditkun; Somboon Keelawat; Apiwat Mutirangura
Journal:  Epigenomics       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 4.778

6.  Increasingly strong reduction in breast cancer mortality due to screening.

Authors:  G van Schoor; S M Moss; J D M Otten; R Donders; E Paap; G J den Heeten; R Holland; M J M Broeders; A L M Verbeek
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Integrating factor analysis and a transgenic mouse model to reveal a peripheral blood predictor of breast tumors.

Authors:  Heather G LaBreche; Joseph R Nevins; Erich Huang
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 3.063

8.  A blood tumor marker combination assay produces high sensitivity and specificity for cancer according to the natural history.

Authors:  Tsuneo Kobayashi
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 4.452

9.  Tumor-induced DNA methylation in the white blood cells of patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Papatson Boonsongserm; Phonthep Angsuwatcharakon; Charoenchai Puttipanyalears; Chatchawit Aporntewan; Narisorn Kongruttanachok; Vitavat Aksornkitti; Nakarin Kitkumthorn; Apiwat Mutirangura
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  Staufen2 isoforms localize to the somatodendritic domain of neurons and interact with different organelles.

Authors:  Thomas F Duchaîne; Indradeo Hemraj; Luc Furic; Anke Deitinghoff; Michael A Kiebler; Luc DesGroseillers
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 5.285

View more
  1 in total

1.  The expression of FLNA and CLU in PBMCs as a novel screening marker for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Rathasapa Patarat; Shoji Riku; Pattapon Kunadirek; Natthaya Chuaypen; Pisit Tangkijvanich; Apiwat Mutirangura; Charoenchai Puttipanyalears
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.