Literature DB >> 33440647

In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of Nanostructured Biphasic Calcium Phosphate in Granules and Putty Configurations.

Jhonathan R B Nascimento1, Suelen C Sartoretto2,3, Adriana T N N Alves4, Carlos F A B Mourão1, Victor R Martinez-Zelaya5, Marcelo J Uzeda3,6, José M Granjeiro7,8, Pietro Montemezzi9, Monica D Calasans-Maia6,8, José A Calasans-Maia10.   

Abstract

Synthetic biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) granules and powder are biocompatible biomaterials with a well-known capacity for osteoconduction, presenting very satisfactory clinical and histological results. It remains unanswered if the putty configuration impacts the biological response to the material. In this study, we aimed to compare the cytocompatibility and biocompatibility of nanostructured BCP in the putty configuration (moldable nanostructured calcium phosphate, MnCaP) on the healing of critical-sized bone defects (8 mm) in rat calvaria. Cytocompatibility was determined through the viability of fibroblast cells (V-79) to the extracts of different concentrations of MnCaP. Forty-five Wistar rats were randomly divided into three groups (n = 15)-clot, MnCaP, and commercial biphasic calcium phosphate in granules configurations (Nanosynt®)-and subdivided into three experimental periods (1, 3, and 6 months). Histological, histomorphometric, and microtomographic analyses allowed the evaluation of newly formed bone, residual biomaterial, and connective tissue. The in vitro evaluation showed that MnCaP was cytocompatible. The histomorphometric results showed that the Nanosynt® group granted the highest new-formed bone values at six months (p < 0.05), although the biomaterial volume did not differ between groups. The putty configuration was easier to handle, and both configurations were biocompatible and osteoconductive, presented similar biosorption rates, and preserved the calvaria architecture.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biocompatibility; biomaterial; cytocompatibility; microtomography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33440647      PMCID: PMC7826908          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18020533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  46 in total

Review 1.  Biomaterials for high-throughput stem cell culture.

Authors:  Sheeny Lan Levengood; William L Murphy
Journal:  Curr Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.828

2.  Randomized clinical trial for the biological evaluation of two nanostructured biphasic calcium phosphate biomaterials as a bone substitute.

Authors:  Marcelo José Uzeda; Rodrigo Figueiredo de Brito Resende; Suelen Cristina Sartoretto; Adriana Terezinha Neves Novellino Alves; José Mauro Granjeiro; Mônica Diuana Calasans-Maia
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 3.932

3.  Back-scattered electron imaging and elemental analysis of retrieved bone tissue following sinus augmentation with deproteinized bovine bone or biphasic calcium phosphate.

Authors:  Christer Lindgren; Mats Hallman; Lars Sennerby; Rachel Sammons
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 5.977

4.  Dose effects of beta-tricalcium phosphate nanoparticles on biocompatibility and bone conductive ability of three-dimensional collagen scaffolds.

Authors:  Shusuke Murakami; Hirofumi Miyaji; Erika Nishida; Kohei Kawamoto; Saori Miyata; Hiroko Takita; Tsukasa Akasaka; Bunshi Fugetsu; Toshihiko Iwanaga; Hiromi Hongo; Norio Amizuka; Tsutomu Sugaya; Masamitsu Kawanami
Journal:  Dent Mater J       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Long-term biocompatibility evaluation of 0.5 % zinc containing hydroxyapatite in rabbits.

Authors:  Rodrigo F B Resende; Gustavo V O Fernandes; Sílvia R A Santos; Alexandre M Rossi; Inayá Lima; José M Granjeiro; Mônica D Calasans-Maia
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Bone repair using a new injectable self-crosslinkable bone substitute.

Authors:  Borhane H Fellah; Pierre Weiss; Olivier Gauthier; Thierry Rouillon; Paul Pilet; Guy Daculsi; Pierre Layrolle
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Influence of hydroxyapatite granule size, porosity, and crystallinity on tissue reaction in vivo. Part B: a comparative study with biphasic synthetic biomaterials.

Authors:  José Eduardo Maté Sánchez de Val; José Luis Calvo-Guirado; Gerardo Gómez-Moreno; Sergio Gehrke; Patricia Mazón; Piedad N De Aza
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 5.021

8.  The shape and size of hydroxyapatite particles dictate inflammatory responses following implantation.

Authors:  Filipa Lebre; Rukmani Sridharan; Michael J Sawkins; Daniel J Kelly; Fergal J O'Brien; Ed C Lavelle
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  In vitro and in vivo evaluations of nanocrystalline Zn-doped carbonated hydroxyapatite/alginate microspheres: zinc and calcium bioavailability and bone regeneration.

Authors:  Victor R Martinez-Zelaya; Laila Zarranz; Edher Z Herrera; Adriana T Alves; Marcelo José Uzeda; Elena Mavropoulos; André L Rossi; Alexandre Mello; José M Granjeiro; Monica D Calasans-Maia; Alexandre M Rossi
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2019-05-10

10.  Critical Defect Healing Assessment in Rat Calvaria Filled with Injectable Calcium Phosphate Cement.

Authors:  Luis Eduardo Schmidt; Henrique Hadad; Igor Rodrigues de Vasconcelos; Luara Teixeira Colombo; Rodrigo Capalbo da Silva; Ana Flavia Piquera Santos; Lara Cristina Cunha Cervantes; Pier Paolo Poli; Fabrizio Signorino; Carlo Maiorana; Paulo Sérgio Perri de Carvalho; Francisley Ávila Souza
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2019-05-13
View more
  1 in total

1.  Physical characterization of biphasic bioceramic materials with different granulation sizes and their influence on bone repair and inflammation in rat calvaria.

Authors:  Joviniano Martins de Oliveira Junior; Pedro Giorgetti Montagner; Rafael Coutinho Carrijo; Elizabeth Ferreira Martinez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.