Literature DB >> 33439899

Does the principle of investment diversification apply to the starting pitching staffs of major league baseball teams?

Paul J Roebber1.   

Abstract

Financial advisors often emphasize asset diversification as a means of limiting losses from investments that perform unexpectedly poorly over a particular time period. One might expect that this perceived wisdom could apply in another high stakes arena-professional baseball-where player salaries comprise a substantial portion of a team's operational costs, year-to-year player performance is highly variable, and injuries can occur at any time. These attributes are particularly true in the case of the starting pitching staffs of professional baseball teams. Accordingly, this study analyzes starting pitcher performance and financial data from all Major League Baseball teams for the period 1985-2016 to determine whether the standard investment advice is applicable in this context, understanding that the time horizon for success for an investor and a baseball team may be distinct. A multiple logistic regression model of playoff qualification probability, based on realized pitcher performance, measures of luck, and starting pitcher staff salary diversification is used to address this question. A further stratification is conducted to determine whether there are differences in strategy for teams with allocated financial resources that are above or below league average. We find that teams with above average resources increase their post-season qualification probability by focusing their salary funds on a relative few starting pitchers rather than diversifying that investment across the staff. Second, we find that pitcher performance must align with that investment in order for the team to have a high qualification probability. Third, the influence of luck is not negligible, but those teams that allocate more overall funds to their pitching are more resilient to bad luck. Thus, poorly resourced teams, who are generally unable to bid for pitchers at the highest salary levels, must adopt alternative strategies to maintain their competitiveness.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33439899      PMCID: PMC7806120          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  6 in total

1.  Disability days in major league baseball.

Authors:  S Conte; R K Requa; J G Garrick
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme.

Authors:  B W Matthews
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1975-10-20

3.  From batting average to wins above replacement to composite end points-refining clinical research using baseball statistical methods.

Authors:  Kevin J Anstrom; Eric L Eisenstein
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  Injury Trends in Major League Baseball Over 18 Seasons: 1998-2015.

Authors:  Stan Conte; Christopher L Camp; Joshua S Dines
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr

5.  Evaluating trauma care: the TRISS method. Trauma Score and the Injury Severity Score.

Authors:  C R Boyd; M A Tolson; W S Copes
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1987-04

6.  Lead us not into tanktation: a simulation modelling approach to gain insights into incentives for sporting teams to tank.

Authors:  Geoffrey N Tuck; Athol R Whitten
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Logistic Regression Model for a Bivariate Binomial Distribution with Applications in Baseball Data Analysis.

Authors:  Yewon Han; Jaeho Kim; Hon Keung Tony Ng; Seong W Kim
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 2.738

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.