| Literature DB >> 33438770 |
Carina Magdaleno1, Trenton House1, Jogendra S Pawar1, Sophia Carvalho1, Narendiran Rajasekaran1, Archana Varadaraj1.
Abstract
Fibronectin (FN) is an extracellular matrix (ECM) glycoprotein that self-assembles into FN fibrils, forming a FN matrix contributing to the stiffness of the ECM. Stromal FN stiffness in cancer has been shown to impact epithelial functions such as migration, cancer metastasis, and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. The role of the FN matrix of epithelial cells in driving such processes remains less well understood and is the focus of this study. Hypoxia, defined by low oxygen tension (<5%) is one of the hallmarks of tumor microenvironments impacting fibril reorganization in stromal and epithelial cells. Here, using the MCF10 breast epithelial progression series of cell lines encompassing normal, preinvasive, and invasive states, we show that FN fibril formation decreases during hypoxia, coinciding with a decrease in migratory potential of these cells. Conversely, we find that FN fibril disruption during three-dimensional acinar growth of normal breast cells resulted in acinar luminal filling. Our data also demonstrates that the luminal filling upon fibril disruption in untransformed MCF10A cells results in a loss of apicobasal polarity, characteristic of pre-invasive and invasive breast cell lines MCF10AT and MCF10 DCIS.com. Overall this is the first study that relates fibril-mediated changes in epithelial cells as critical players in lumen clearing of breast acini and maintenance of the untransformed growth characteristic.Entities:
Keywords: acini; fibronectin; hypoxia; integrin; migration
Year: 2021 PMID: 33438770 PMCID: PMC8016724 DOI: 10.1002/jcb.29885
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cell Biochem ISSN: 0730-2312 Impact factor: 4.429
Figure 1Fibril formation decreases in hypoxia‐exposed breast epithelial cells. (A) MCF10A, MCF10AT and MCF10 DCIS.com cells were exposed to hypoxia (1% O2) for the indicated times and cell lysates fractionated using deoxycholate to separate fibril FN and soluble FN. (B) Ratio of fibril versus soluble FN fractions, normalized to loading control GAPDH is plotted as mean ± SEM. Quantification is an average of three independent trials. Statistically significant differences between untreated and hypoxic samples were calculated using unpaired Student's t‐test. Actual p values are included. (C) Total cell lysates at the indicated treatment times were lysed in sodium dodecyl sulfate buffer to solubilize total FN pools (fibril and soluble combined) and immunoblotted against FN. Vinculin is used as loading control. (D) Total FN levels normalized to vinculin are plotted as mean ± SEM of three independent trials. Statistical significance and actual p values were determined using the unpaired Student t‐test. (E) Total cell lysates immunoblotted against proteins as indicated. Actin was used as loading control
Figure 2Integrin‐β1 is not activated by hypoxia. (A) Total cell lysates at the indicated treatment times were lysed in sodium dodecyl sulfate and immunoblotted for integrin‐β1 and integrin‐α5. Vinculin was used as loading control. Data is a representative image of three independent trials. (B) Untreated and hypoxia‐exposed cells were fixed at indicated time points after treatment and immunostained for the active conformation of integrin‐β1 (green) and nuclear stain DAPI (blue). Integrin activator MnCl2 was included as a positive control. Scale bar = 20 µm. (C) Untreated and hypoxia‐exposed cells were marked using fluorescent‐tagged antibodies for activated integrin‐β1 and positive cells were quantified using a Beckman Coulter CytoFLEX benchtop flowcytometer. Twelve‐hour hypoxia treatment (blue) did not increase activation of integrin‐β1 (x‐axis) in comparison to untreated controls (red) or MnCl2‐treated positive controls (green) in any of the three cell lines tested. Bar graph of mean fluorescence intensities (MFIs; n = 2) determined from flowcytometry data in (C) is shown
Figure 3Hypoxia decreases chemotactic migration. (A) MCF10 series of cell lines were allowed to migrate under normoxic (21% O2) or hypoxic (1% O2) environments towards a serum chemotactic gradient for 12 h. Real‐time migration of the cells through the 8‐µm pore was automatically quantified by the ACEA xCELLigence system and the migration curve was plotted. Each data point is an average of technical duplicates ± SD. Data is representative of two independent determinations. Statistically significant differences in migration up to 10 h between normoxia and hypoxia as denoted by actual p values were determined using the Mann–Whitney U test. (B) Cell migration was performed as described in (A) in the presence of 500‐nM functional upstream domain (FUD), 500‐nM III‐11C, or no‐peptide control. Each data point is an average of technical duplicates ± SD. Data is representative of three independent determinations
Figure 4FN fibril disruption blocks lumen formation and increases 3D acinar size. (A) MCF10 series of cell lines were cultured on Matrigel™ for 14 days in the presence of indicated treatments throughout the course of the culture period. Acini were fixed and stained using nuclear stain DAPI (blue). Images are z‐slices of a center slice in a z‐stack acquired using a confocal microscope. Scale bar = 50 µm. (B) Immunostained acini in (A) were separated into “lumen” and “no lumen” containing acini and plotted as percentages. Data is an average of multiple determinations and a total of approximately 40 acini per condition were included in the analysis. (C) Maximum projections of immunostained acini in (A) were used to determine the acinar area. Each data point represents a separate acinus. Statistical significance and actual p values between untreated and functional upstream domain (FUD)‐treated acini were determined using the unpaired Student t‐test
Figure 5FN fibril formation is required for apicobasal polarization during acini development. (A–C) MCF10 series of cell lines were cultured on Matrigel™ for 14 days in the presence of 500‐nM functional upstream domain (FUD), 500‐nM III‐11C, or no‐peptide control. The acini were fixed and immunostained for the basal polarization marker integrin‐α6 (red) and counterstained using the nuclear stain DAPI (blue). Images are z‐slices of a center slice in a z‐stack acquired using a confocal microscope. Scale bar = 50 µm. (A) MCF10A acini show a rim‐like localization for integrin‐α6 in untreated and control peptide ‐treated acini. FUD treated acini demonstrate invaginations in integrin‐α6 staining towards the lumen. Quantification of luminal integrin‐α6 (right) was performed by measuring integrated intensities (intensity/area) within one region of interest (ROI) per acinus. Each ROI comprised the majority of the lumen while omitting the acinar margin. Statistical significance in intensity variation between the untreated and peptide‐treated acini (as denoted by actual p values) was determined using the unpaired Student t‐test. (B) MCF10AT acini display integrin‐α6 staining in the lumen and rim of the acini in all treatment conditions. (C) MCF10 DCIS.com acini display random integrin‐α6 staining as shown