PURPOSE: Rigid image registration (RIR) accuracy is crucial for image guided radiotherapy (IGRT). However, existing clinical image registration assessment methods cannot separate and quantify RIR error sources. Herein, we develop an extension of the 'full circle method' for RIR consistency. Paired registration circuits are used to isolate sources of RIR error caused by reference dataset substitution, from those inherent to the underlying RIR. This approach was demonstrated in the context of MRI-only IGRT, assessing substitution of MRI-derived synthetic-CT (sCT) for conventional CT, in a cohort of rectal cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Planning CT, MRI-derived sCT, and two CBCTs from seven rectal cancer patients were retrospectively registered with global and soft tissue clipbox based RIR. Paired registration circuits were constructed using two moving (cone beam CT) images and two reference images (CT and sCT), per patient. Differences between inconsistencies in registration circuits containing CT and sCT were used to determine changes in registration accuracy due to substitution of sCT for CT. RESULTS: sCT was found to be equivalent to CT under global RIR, with median differences of 0.05 mm and 0.01°. Soft tissue clipbox based RIR with sCT exhibited gross misregistration (>5 mm or 3°) for 3 patients. Registration consistency was degraded compared to CT across the cohort, with median differences of 0.54 mm and 0.15°. CONCLUSION: A paired registration circuit methodology for assessing RIR accuracy without ground truth information was developed and demonstrated for MRI-only IGRT in rectal cancer. This highlighted a reduction in clipbox based RIR consistency when sCT was substituted for conventional CT. The developed method enabled separation of degraded registration accuracy, from other error sources within the overall registration inconsistency. This novel methodology is applicable to any RIR scenario and enables analysis of the change in RIR performance on modification of image data or process.
PURPOSE: Rigid image registration (RIR) accuracy is crucial for image guided radiotherapy (IGRT). However, existing clinical image registration assessment methods cannot separate and quantify RIR error sources. Herein, we develop an extension of the 'full circle method' for RIR consistency. Paired registration circuits are used to isolate sources of RIR error caused by reference dataset substitution, from those inherent to the underlying RIR. This approach was demonstrated in the context of MRI-only IGRT, assessing substitution of MRI-derived synthetic-CT (sCT) for conventional CT, in a cohort of rectal cancerpatients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Planning CT, MRI-derived sCT, and two CBCTs from seven rectal cancerpatients were retrospectively registered with global and soft tissue clipbox based RIR. Paired registration circuits were constructed using two moving (cone beam CT) images and two reference images (CT and sCT), per patient. Differences between inconsistencies in registration circuits containing CT and sCT were used to determine changes in registration accuracy due to substitution of sCT for CT. RESULTS: sCT was found to be equivalent to CT under global RIR, with median differences of 0.05 mm and 0.01°. Soft tissue clipbox based RIR with sCT exhibited gross misregistration (>5 mm or 3°) for 3 patients. Registration consistency was degraded compared to CT across the cohort, with median differences of 0.54 mm and 0.15°. CONCLUSION: A paired registration circuit methodology for assessing RIR accuracy without ground truth information was developed and demonstrated for MRI-only IGRT in rectal cancer. This highlighted a reduction in clipbox based RIR consistency when sCT was substituted for conventional CT. The developed method enabled separation of degraded registration accuracy, from other error sources within the overall registration inconsistency. This novel methodology is applicable to any RIR scenario and enables analysis of the change in RIR performance on modification of image data or process.
Authors: David Bird; Matthew Beasley; Michael G Nix; Marcus Tyyger; Hazel McCallum; Mark Teo; Alexandra Gilbert; Nathalie Casanova; Rachel Cooper; David L Buckley; David Sebag-Montefiore; Richard Speight; Ann M Henry; Bashar Al-Qaisieh Journal: Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Date: 2021-07-18